S Qualitätsinfrastruktur
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2018 (32) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (22)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (5)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (3)
- Posterpräsentation (1)
- Forschungsbericht (1)
Schlagworte
- Ökodesign (5)
- Kreislaufwirtschaft (4)
- Normung (4)
- Akkreditierung (3)
- Energieeffizienz (3)
- IETF (3)
- Konformitätsbewertung (3)
- Ressourceneffizienz (3)
- Standards (3)
- Wireless Sensor Networks (3)
- Abgasanlage (2)
- COMAR (2)
- Certification (2)
- Circular economy (2)
- Conformity Assessment (2)
- Cybersecurity (2)
- Dunstabzugshauben (2)
- Durability (2)
- EPTIS (2)
- Energieverbrauchskennzeichnung (2)
- Energy label (2)
- Gasetagenheizungen (2)
- Heizkessel (2)
- ISO/IEC 17025 (2)
- IT-Security (2)
- Marktüberwachung (2)
- Proficiency testing (2)
- Qualitätsmanagement (2)
- Qualitätssicherung (2)
- RM and PT (2)
- Reference materials (2)
- Reparability (2)
- Schornstein (2)
- 1-dimensional, (1)
- Accreditation (1)
- Air Conditioner (1)
- AlPO4-5 (1)
- Benchmarking (1)
- Circumvention (1)
- Confined water (1)
- Cooking fume extractor (1)
- Diffusion (1)
- Dynamische Prüfung (1)
- EFQM Excellence Model (1)
- EURAS (1)
- Ecodesign (1)
- Energielabel (1)
- Energiepolitik (1)
- Energy Efficiency (1)
- Energy Label (1)
- Europäische Kommission (1)
- Fettabscheidegrad (1)
- Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis (1)
- Impact of standards (1)
- Intellectual property rights (IPR) (1)
- Internetplattform (1)
- Lebensdauer (1)
- Methodenentwicklung (1)
- NAPE (1)
- Produktprüfungen (1)
- Prüflaboratorien (1)
- Range hood (1)
- Rechtssetzung (1)
- Recycability (1)
- Recyclability (1)
- Recyclingfähigkeit (1)
- Reparierbarkeit (1)
- Research agenda (1)
- Ressourcen (1)
- Screening (1)
- Standardization research (1)
- Test standard (1)
- Tumble dryer (1)
- Verbraucherschutz (1)
- Water adsorption (1)
- Wärmepumpen (1)
- Wäschetrockner (1)
- Zertifizierung (1)
- Ökdoesign (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (22)
Die Kreislaufwirtschaftsinitiative der Europäischen Kommission fordert klar grundlegende Aspekte der Kreislaufwirtschaft in bereits bestehende Rechtsrahmen einzubetten. Anforderungen zur gesetzlich vorgeschriebenen Lebensdauer, Reparierbarkeit und Recyclingfähigkeit von Produkten sollen zukünftig auf europäischer Ebene ins Leben gerufen werden. Ein geeignetes Spielfeld ist die Ökodesign-Richtlinie. Momentan regelt sie primär die Energieeffizienz von energieverbrauchsrelevanten Produkten, doch der Fokus wird aktuell um Anforderungen an den nachhaltigen Einsatz von Ressourcen erweitert. Bei den gegenwärtigen Aktivitäten im Ökodesign steht der Normungsauftrag M/543 im Zentrum. Es wurde 2015 von der Europäischen Kommission an CEN/CENELEC vergeben und später stieß auch ETSI dazu. Bislang sind acht generische EN-Normen und zwei Fachberichte (Technical Report (TR)) geplant. Sie sollen grundlegende Aspekte der Nachhaltigkeit von energieverbrauchsrelevanten Produkten, die von der Ökodesign-Richtlinie betroffen sind, abdecken. Trotz der zu erwartenden hohen Reichweite dieses Vorhabens scheinen die Inhalte und der eigentliche Zweck der zu erarbeitenden Normen vielen Marktakteuren noch nicht vollständig bekannt zu sein. Daher hat ein nationaler Zentralverband eingeladen zu berichten. In dem Vortrag werden Antworten auf folgende Fragen gegeben: Warum im Ökodesign? Was ist geplant? Was ist betroffen? Worum geht es in den Normen?
Digital transformation and especially the dramatic rise of products and services connected to the Internet of Things raise the questions on how to deal with the increasing risks related to Privacy and Cybersecurity. Presumably, these risks seem to be insufficiently reflected in the European Union’s current regulative system – by being neither part of the traditional definition of a safe product nor part of product-specific vertical or horizontal directives. Certification based on standards as underlying requirements has been identified by policymakers as an instrument to address this issue. The latest European draft regulation aims at increasing security and trust in ICT products and services, and reducing current European market fragmentation with a new Cybersecurity Certification Framework. Based on the results of a qualitative analysis of stakeholder statements on the current proposal on the Cybersecurity Act, this paper discusses elements of the proposed Cybersecurity Certification Framework. As a theoretical background, this paper provides definitions of the terms Safety, IT-security, and Cybersecurity, presents selected Cybersecurity-related standards and provides an outlook on future challenges to Conformity Assessment in the digital transformation.
Digital transformation and especially the dramatic rise of products and services connected to the Internet of Things raise the questions on how to deal with the increasing risks related to Privacy and Cybersecurity. Presumably, these risks seem to be insufficiently reflected in the European Union’s current regulative system – by being neither part of the traditional definition of a safe product nor part of product-specific vertical or horizontal directives. Certification based on standards as underlying requirements has been identified by policymakers as an instrument to address this issue. The latest European draft regulation aims at increasing security and trust in ICT products and services, and reducing current European market fragmentation with a new Cybersecurity Certification Framework. Based on the results of a qualitative analysis of stakeholder statements on the current proposal on the Cybersecurity Act, this paper discusses elements of the proposed Cybersecurity Certification Framework. As a theoretical background, this paper provides definitions of the terms Safety, IT-security, and Cybersecurity, presents selected Cybersecurity-related standards and provides an outlook on future challenges to Conformity Assessment in the digital transformation.
Standardization for the Industrial Internet of Things: Engagement by China, Germany and the USA
(2018)
Standardization is a major challenge for a successful digital transformation of manufacturing. Industry and governments have put this topic on their agenda and stakeholders worldwide are engaged in various Standard Development Organizations, consortia and fora, seeking to shape the standards for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). This paper for the first time analyzes how well participants from the USA, China and Germany are actually represented and engaged in standards development for the IIoT. Using quantitative metrics, the study specifically investigates standardization activities for Wireless Sensor Networks at the Internet Engineering Taskforce (IETF). The results are divergent: Measuring the authorships of IETF Internet-Drafts, China’s successful catch-up in international standardization is confirmed, having even outperformed the USA. When it comes to the authorship of the actual standards at IETF, China could not assert its top position. Here, US authors are leading, followed by German participants. The paper discusses different engagement patterns in depth and analyzes the national economic, institutional and political backgrounds that influence them.
Standardization for the Industrial Internet of Things: Engagement by China, Germany and the USA
(2018)
Standardization is a major challenge for a successful digital transformation of manufacturing. Industry and governments have put this topic on their agenda and stakeholders worldwide are engaged in various Standard Development Organizations, consortia and fora, seeking to shape the standards for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). This paper for the first time analyzes how well participants from the USA, China and Germany are actually represented and engaged in standards development for the IIoT. Using quantitative metrics, the study specifically investigates standardization activities for Wireless Sensor Networks at the Internet Engineering Taskforce (IETF). The results are divergent: Measuring the authorships of IETF Internet-Drafts, China’s successful catch-up in international standardization is confirmed, having even outperformed the USA. When it comes to the authorship of the actual standards at IETF, China could not assert its top position. Here, US authors are leading, followed by German participants. The paper discusses different engagement patterns in depth and analyzes the national economic, institutional and political backgrounds that influence them.
Standardization for the Industrial Internet of Things: Engagement by China, Germany and the USA
(2018)
Standardization is a major challenge for a successful digital transformation of manufacturing. Industry and governments have put this topic on their agenda and stakeholders worldwide are engaged in various Standard Development Organizations, consortia and fora, seeking to shape the standards for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). This paper for the first time analyzes how well participants from the USA, China and Germany are actually represented and engaged in standards development for the IIoT. Using quantitative metrics, the study specifically investigates standardization activities for Wireless Sensor Networks at the Internet Engineering Taskforce (IETF). The results are divergent: Measuring the authorships of IETF Internet-Drafts, China’s successful catch-up in international standardization is confirmed, having even outperformed the USA. When it comes to the authorship of the actual standards at IETF, China could not assert its top position. Here, US authors are leading, followed by German participants. The paper discusses different engagement patterns in depth and analyzes the national economic, institutional and political backgrounds that influence them.
Neues Energielabel
(2018)