8.2 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfmethoden für das Bauwesen
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (128)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (90)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (62)
- Posterpräsentation (41)
- Buchkapitel (8)
- Forschungsdatensatz (8)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (3)
- Dissertation (1)
- Sonstiges (1)
- Forschungsbericht (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (343) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Concrete (98)
- Ultrasound (82)
- LIBS (44)
- Monitoring (44)
- Non-destructive testing (37)
- NDT (24)
- Coda wave interferometry (21)
- Embedded sensors (18)
- Civil engineering (17)
- Material moisture (17)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (343) (entfernen)
Paper des Monats
- ja (2)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (128)
This paper reviews state-of-the-art in nondestructive testing (NDT) and semidestructive testing (SDT) methods applicable for imaging the condition of structural timber. Both NDT and SDT imaging reveal defects, damages, and decay, while the extent of wood decay can also be quantified. Combined with an appropriate data interpretation concerning the internal defects, the mechanical properties of the material can also be assessed. The possibilities and limitations of the most relevant individual NDT and SDT methods, also in combination with each other, are outlined and compared. To facilitate comparison, many observations are reported based on the same test specimen.
The detection of moisture in building materials has a high priority in civil engineering to locate and prevent possible moisture damages, e.g. mold, corrosion, delamination etc. Furthermore, it is of great significancy to achieve a better understanding of moisture transport and pore space in different materials. To prevent the degeneration of structures and materials, non-destructive testing methods are more and more deployed. As a non-destructive method in this work, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is applied using a strayfield open magnet device that enables one-dimensional measurements in a defined volumen. By using NMR, the water content of the sample can be determined and also the pore size distribution can be deduced from the relaxation time distribution when having a comparison method like mercury intrusion porosimetry.
In this study different synthetic homogenous materials with defined and almost unimodal pore size distributions are investigated as well as building materials like screed. For analyzing the pore space, the samples were measured at different saturation levels and the building materials at different hydration states as well.
High-Amplitude Surge of a Pitching Airfoil: Complementary Wind- and Water-Tunnel Measurements
(2018)
RECENT interest in gust response, rotorcraft forward flight and wind energy, among other applications, has focused on streamwise oscillations of nominally two-dimensional airfoils in attached and separated flows. The airfoil may be simultaneously held at constant incidence or execute some maneuver, such as pitch.
The relative freestream is spatially uniform but temporally unsteady, and this can be accomplished in a ground-test facility in two ways. The first method is to vary the output of the prime mover, such as the rotational speed of the impeller or the blower driving a wind tunnel, or (alternatively) to vary the pressure drop in the tunnel, thereby varying the flow speed in the test section, despite nominally constant primemover revolutions per minute. The second method is used to keep the tunnel’s operating speed constant, as well as to move the test article in the streamwise direction, fore and aft (for example, via an electric linear motor), such that the relative freestream speed felt by the test article varies according to some waveform. Typically, the latter approach is chosen in water tunnels, where there is too much tunnel-circuit inertia to vary the flow speed directly but where the usually low tunnel test section flow speeds enable large excursions in the relative freestream by oscillation of the test article. In fact, outright reverse flow is possible by moving the test article in the laboratory frame at a higher speed than the water-tunnel flow speed. In either case, a sinusoidal relative-speed waveform is the most intuitively realizable, and this can be combined with similar oscillations in the airfoil incidence angle or other kinematics. Although the two methods of realizing streamwise oscillations are mechanically distinct, experimental comparisons between an oscillating test article in a water tunnel and a stationary test article in a wind tunnel with a louvermechanismhave demonstrated agreement in themeasured lift and drag histories. Such experimentswere performed by Granlund et al. for a 10% freestream amplitude oscillation and fixed airfoil incidence, comparing a free-surface water tunnel and a closed-circuit wind tunnel. After buoyancy was subtracted from the wind-tunnel data (resulting from the louver pressure drop) and the model inertia subtracted from the water-tunnel data (resulting from acceleration of the test article), the remaining lift and drag histories matched well at the low freestream oscillation amplitude regime. The work of Granlund et al. was later extended to high-advance-ratio streamwise oscillations of 50% amplitude by Greenblatt et al., where the aerodynamic histories of the water-tunnel and wind-tunnel facilities were compared in combined pitch and freestreamoscillations (governed by relative pitch phase), pure pitch oscillations, and purely freestream oscillations. Agreement between the two facilities’ data for fixed-incidence streamwise oscillations was reasonably good, and in fact, better than agreement in just the static lift and drag, evidently owing to differences in blockage and model-support systems. Additionally, Greenblatt et al. determined there was no strong coupling between simultaneous freestream oscillations and pitch oscillations on resultant lift and moment coefficients.