7.2 Ingenieurbau
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (161) (entfernen)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (161) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Structural Health Monitoring (16)
- Offshore wind energy (9)
- Fatigue (8)
- Ground vibration (8)
- Brücken (7)
- Offshore (7)
- Design methods (6)
- Physical phenomenology (6)
- Pile foundations (6)
- Structural health monitoring (6)
- Offshore wind turbines (5)
- SHM (5)
- Bahnerschütterungen (4)
- Building vibration (4)
- Deterioration (4)
- Foundations (4)
- Gründungsstrukturen (4)
- Model interpolation (4)
- Monitoring (4)
- Numerical modelling (4)
- Structural systems (4)
- Buckling (3)
- Damage characterization (3)
- Datenmanagement (3)
- Deep foundations (3)
- Erschütterungsminderung (3)
- Grout (3)
- Hammer impact (3)
- Impact (3)
- Inspection (3)
- Leichtbau (3)
- Maintenance (3)
- Monopiles (3)
- Offshore Windenergieanlagen (3)
- Offshore geomechanics (3)
- Physical testing (3)
- Planar tomography (3)
- Probabilistic (3)
- Shell Buckling (3)
- Slab track (3)
- Soil-structure interaction (3)
- Steel structures (3)
- Train passage (3)
- Vibration (3)
- Wind Energy (3)
- Windenergie (3)
- Zivile Sicherheit (3)
- AISTEC (2)
- Automatisierte schweißtechnische Fertigung (2)
- Bayesian updating (2)
- Belastungsversuch (2)
- Bridges (2)
- Compaction Grouting (2)
- Container loading (2)
- Crack detection (2)
- Damage detection (2)
- Design (2)
- Dispersionsmessung (2)
- Drop test (2)
- Elastische Elemente (2)
- Elastische Gleiselemente (2)
- Emission (2)
- Environmental effects (2)
- Erosion (2)
- Erschütterungen (2)
- Erschütterungsprognose (2)
- Fault detection (2)
- Foundation load (2)
- GPU parallel computation (2)
- Großer Fallturm Horstwalde (2)
- High-strength concrete (2)
- Inspection planning (2)
- Klimakammer (2)
- Layered soil (2)
- Micromechanical modelling (2)
- Modalanalyse (2)
- Numeric simulation (2)
- Offshore Pile Foundation (2)
- Offshore foundations (2)
- Offshore geotechnics (2)
- Offshore wind (2)
- Pile Tip Buckling (2)
- Railway (2)
- Railways (2)
- Reinforced concrete structure (2)
- Reliability (2)
- Repair (2)
- Risslumineszenz (2)
- Schwingungsdynamik (2)
- Statistical method (2)
- Subspace-based method (2)
- Temperature effects (2)
- Temperature rejection (2)
- Train-induced ground vibration (2)
- Tunnel (2)
- Ultrasonic testing (2)
- Vehicle-track-soil interaction (2)
- Vibration measurement (2)
- Vibration measurements (2)
- Wellengeschwindigkeit (2)
- Wind (2)
- Windenergy (2)
- 2-span bridge (1)
- Achsimpulse (1)
- Acoustic emission testing (1)
- Amplitude-charge weight laws (1)
- Amplitude-distance laws (1)
- Amplituden-Abstands-Gesetze (1)
- Analysis of variance (1)
- Ansys Autodyn (1)
- Apartment building (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Asphalt (1)
- Assessment (1)
- Attenuation (1)
- Automatisierte Fertigung (1)
- Automatisierte schweißtechniche Fertigung (1)
- Axial load bearing (1)
- Axle impulses (1)
- Axle pulses (1)
- Axle-sequence spectrum (1)
- BAM Windenergie Fügetechnik (1)
- Bahngleis (1)
- Ballast track (1)
- Base isolation (1)
- Baugrunddynamik (1)
- Bauwerk-Boden-Wechselwirkung (1)
- Bauwerksmonitoring (1)
- Bauwerksüberwachung (1)
- Bayes'sche Analyse (1)
- Bayesian System Identification (1)
- Bayesian methods (1)
- Bayesian system identification (1)
- Belastungsfahrt (1)
- Belastungszug (1)
- Beulen (1)
- Big Data (1)
- Bionik (1)
- Blast (1)
- Bodenschlitz (1)
- Bodenübertragungsfunktion (1)
- Boundary element method (1)
- Box-Behnken (1)
- Bridge (1)
- Brücke (1)
- Buckling piles circular shells (1)
- Building information modelling (1)
- CFD (1)
- Cars (1)
- Changing process noise (1)
- Chemisoprtion (1)
- Climate Chamber (1)
- Climate chamber (1)
- Compressive Cyclic loading (1)
- Compressive cyclic loading (1)
- Compressive strength (1)
- Computer Vision (1)
- Concrete (1)
- Crack Luminescence (1)
- Crack formation (1)
- Crack pattern (1)
- Crack repair (1)
- Cracks (1)
- Cyclic axial shearing (1)
- Cyclic degradation (1)
- Cyclic load (1)
- DEM (1)
- DEM-LBM simulation (1)
- DUCON® (1)
- Damage Detection (1)
- Damage identification (1)
- Deckeneigenfrequenzen (1)
- Deckenschwingungen (1)
- Design models (1)
- Design practice (1)
- Digital Image Correlation (1)
- Digital Twin (1)
- Digital twin (1)
- Digitalisierung (1)
- Displacements (1)
- Drone (1)
- Drop Test (1)
- Drucker-Prager (1)
- Ductility (1)
- Dynamic soil properties (1)
- Dynamische Bodenkennwerte (1)
- Dämpfung (1)
- E-modulus (1)
- EERA Joint Program (1)
- Earth masonry (1)
- Earthen hydraulic constructions (1)
- Earthen hydraulic infrastructures (1)
- Einflusslinie (1)
- Einflusslinien (1)
- Einfügungsdämmung (1)
- Elastische Gebäudelagerung (1)
- End-of-life decision making (1)
- Energy (1)
- Entscheidungsfindung (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Environmental Effects (1)
- Ermüdungsprüfung (1)
- Ermüdungsschäden (1)
- Erneuerbare Energien (1)
- Erosion of cohesive soils (1)
- Erschütterungen im Fernfeld (1)
- Erschütterungsausbreitung (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Excitation forces (1)
- Explosion-induced ground vibrations (1)
- FEM (1)
- Fahrzeug-Fahrweg-Boden-Wechselwirkung (1)
- Faseroptik (1)
- Fatigue deterioration (1)
- Fiber optic sensing (1)
- Filter effects (1)
- Finite Elemente Simulation (1)
- Finite element models (1)
- Flexibility (1)
- Floors (1)
- Fluid-structure interaction (1)
- Fly ash (1)
- Footbridge (1)
- Force reconstruction (1)
- Freight train (1)
- Frequency response function (1)
- GMNIA (1)
- GNSS (1)
- GPU parallelisation (1)
- Gebäudelagerung (1)
- Gebäudemodelle (1)
- Gebäudeschwingungen (1)
- Geomechanics (1)
- Geomechanics of offshore foundations (1)
- Geometrie (1)
- Gleiströge (1)
- Granular Cohesive Materials, (1)
- Ground (1)
- Ground vibration measurements (1)
- Grout Injection (1)
- Grouted Connection (1)
- Grouted connection (1)
- Grouting (1)
- Halbraum (1)
- High-rise buildings (1)
- High-speed train (1)
- Immission (1)
- Impact damage of reinforced concrete (1)
- Impedanzmethode (1)
- Inertial interaction (1)
- Injection Sequence (1)
- Inspeciton (1)
- Interface (1)
- Interface model (1)
- Irregular ballast (1)
- Irregular soil (1)
- Irregularities (1)
- Jacket support structure (1)
- Jet erosion test (1)
- Kinematic interaction (1)
- Knudsen effect (1)
- Kraft auf den Boden (1)
- LBM-DEM (1)
- LBM-DEM coupling (1)
- Laboratory beam structure (1)
- Lateral load bearing (1)
- Layered soils (1)
- Leichtbauprinzipien (1)
- Linear parameter varying systems (1)
- Load Test (1)
- Load bearing behaviour (1)
- Long-term shrinkage (1)
- Macromechanical Sample Strength (1)
- Maintal Bridge Gemuenden (1)
- Maintalbrücke Gemünden (1)
- Marine geotechnics (1)
- Material Point Method (1)
- Material moisture (1)
- Material tests (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Measurements (1)
- Mechanical challenges (1)
- Messfahrt (1)
- Metakaolin (1)
- Micro silica (1)
- Micro-reinforcement (1)
- Microfine cement (1)
- Micromechanical LBM-DEM simulation (1)
- Micromechanical Tensile Failure (1)
- Micromechanical analysis (1)
- Micromechanical simulation (1)
- Mitigation (1)
- Mix design (1)
- Mobile elements (1)
- Modal Analysis (1)
- Modal load spectrum (1)
- Modal system identification (1)
- Model Update (1)
- Model updating (1)
- Modellierung (1)
- Modes and waves (1)
- Molecular diffusion (1)
- Monopile (1)
- Monopile Buckling (1)
- Movin load test (1)
- Non destructive testing (1)
- Non-Destructive Evaluation (1)
- Non-destructive testing (1)
- Normung (1)
- Numerical analysis (1)
- Numerical model (1)
- Numerical modeling (1)
- Numerical simulation of impact damage (1)
- Offhore (1)
- Office tower (1)
- Offshore Structures (1)
- Offshore Wind Energy (1)
- Offshore Wind Energy Converter (1)
- Offshore Windenergie (1)
- Offshore pile foundations (1)
- Offshore wind energy foundations (1)
- Offshore wind farm (1)
- Offshore wind farms (1)
- Offshore wind-turbine foundations (1)
- Offshore-Wind (1)
- Offshore-Windenergieanlagen (1)
- Operational modal analysis (1)
- Optimal Sensor Placement (1)
- Passenger train (1)
- Pfahlfußbeulen (1)
- Pfahlnachgiebigkeiten (1)
- Physisorption (1)
- Pile Buckling (1)
- Pile Capacity (1)
- Pile Foundation (1)
- Pile ageing (1)
- Pile groups (1)
- Pile retrofit system (1)
- Pile-Tip-Buckling (1)
- Point Cloud (1)
- Post-impact evaluation (1)
- Prediction (1)
- Prediction of explosion induced ground and building vibration (1)
- Predictive maintenance (1)
- Probabilitische Ingenieurmodelle (1)
- Probability of Detection (1)
- Prognose (1)
- Quasi-static and dynamic tests (1)
- Radar (1)
- Railbridge (1)
- Railway bridge (1)
- Railway tracks (1)
- Railway trafiic (1)
- Railway tunnel (1)
- Randelementmethode (1)
- Randomly heterogeneous soil (1)
- Rayleighwellendispersion (1)
- Rechenmodelle (1)
- Rechenverfahren (1)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- Reinforced concrete (1)
- Repowering (1)
- Research data management (1)
- Residual evaluation (1)
- Richtige Fahrzeugmasse (1)
- Risiko (1)
- Risikoanalyse (1)
- Risk (1)
- Risk-based maintenance planning (1)
- Rissprozes (1)
- Rissprozess (1)
- Road bridges (1)
- SHM Environmental (1)
- Safety (1)
- Scaling (1)
- Scattering (1)
- Schadensdetektion (1)
- Schadensüberwachung (1)
- Schienenfahrweg (1)
- Schienenfahrwege (1)
- Schwingungsbasierte Verfahren (1)
- Schwingungsmonitoring (1)
- Shrinkage (1)
- Simple and fast prediction (1)
- Simulation and experiment (1)
- Site-characterization (1)
- Size effect (1)
- Slenderness effect (1)
- Soil Struture Interaction (1)
- Soil erosion (1)
- Soil properties (1)
- Soil-Structure-Interaction (1)
- Soil-pile interaction (1)
- Soil-wall floor model (1)
- Soil-water-structure interaction (1)
- Spektralanalyse (1)
- Stability Buckling soil-structure-interaction piles offshore (1)
- Stabilität (1)
- Static load (1)
- Statistical correlations (1)
- Statistical tests (1)
- Statistische Korrelationen (1)
- Stereo photogrammetry (1)
- Stochastic Subspace Damage Detection (1)
- Structural Systems (1)
- Structural integrity (1)
- Structural integrity maintenance (1)
- Structural integrity management (1)
- Strukturmonitoring (1)
- Störgrößen (1)
- Subspace methods (1)
- Subspace-based residual (1)
- Substructures (1)
- Supplementary cementitious materials (1)
- Support structures (1)
- Surface line (1)
- Surface-tunnel reduction (1)
- System Identification (1)
- System identification (1)
- Systemidentifikation (1)
- TOP (1)
- Temperatureinflüsse (1)
- Tensile Capacity (1)
- Time-variant reliability (1)
- Tip Buckling (1)
- Tomographic damage evaluation (1)
- Track damage (1)
- Train configuration (1)
- Train excitation (1)
- Train passages (1)
- Train speed (1)
- Tran speed (1)
- Transfer fuction (1)
- Transmission (1)
- Tunnel line (1)
- Tunnelstrecke (1)
- UHPC (1)
- Umwelteinflüsse (1)
- Un- certainty (1)
- Uncertainty (1)
- Uncertainty in reference (1)
- Unterraummethoden (1)
- Value of Information (1)
- Varying soil stiffness (1)
- Varying track stiffness (1)
- Vibration monitoring (1)
- Vibrations (1)
- Vollraum (1)
- Water-structure interaction (1)
- Wave-Tower interaction (1)
- Wellenausbreitung (1)
- Wellenausbreitung in der Tiefe (1)
- Wellenfeldberechnung (1)
- Wind Energy Structures (1)
- Wind Turbines (1)
- Wind energy (1)
- Wind turbines (1)
- Wind-farm aerodynamics (1)
- Windfarm wake analysis (1)
- Zuggeschwindigkeit (1)
- elastische Gebäudelagerungen (1)
- risk, reliability, inspection planning, offshore wind turbines (1)
- zerstreute Achslastimpulse (1)
- Übertragungsmatrizen (1)
- Überwachung (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 7.2 Ingenieurbau (161) (entfernen)
Protection against terroristic or accidental scenarios in industrial settings requires suitable designs of structures to resist blast loads. Field testing as well as finite element simulations are among the techniques available to engineers in the understanding of the structural behavior against blast loading.
As blast testing of complex scenarios can be very resource intensive, tests are generally performed for simplified scenarios. Numerical tools can be used to model these scenarios to get better insight into blast loading, structural response, and the resulting damage to the structure. During the next steps, the simplified scenario is successively modified in numerical simulations to incorporate complexities that cannot be covered in blast testing experiments. One of the conditions for this approach to work is that the original simplified numerical simulation is valid. The scopes and challenges encountered in such a validation are the focus of this presentation/article.
A relatively ‘simple’ field test of a horizontal reinforced concrete (RC) slab subjected to blast loading is taken as an example for validation of the performance of numerical tools. The blast test incorporated various measurement techniques to quantify the blast load as well as the behavior of the RC slab. Blast load was measured using flush mounted piezoelectric pressure gauges, whereas acceleration sensors and fiber-optic sensor cables were used to characterize the dynamic behavior of the slab under blast loading. Additionally, damage characteristics were ascertained also using fiber optic sensing. The application of such measurement techniques, along with different numerical software available for the analysis of the scenario in question, demonstrate the scope of our contribution.
When it comes to the challenges, it begins with proper instrumentation of the test specimen followed by the data processing. For numerical modelling, geometric conditions with appropriate boundary constraints, physical conditions such as the configuration of the rebars, as well as material parameters add to this challenge. The issues of choosing appropriate material models and comparison of results with multiple software tools will be discussed. This discussion forms the basis for a coherent approach to technical-safety assessment of blast effects on structures in its broader sense.
This presentation discusses the potentials of probabilistic methods in offshore foundation installation, from the perspective of probabilistic ground models and data-driven site characterization. We discuss about methodologies for utilizing site-specific geotechnical (CPT) and geological data, aiming to construct an integrated ground model that can predict stratigraphic profiles and useful for geotechnical design parameters at any location within a 3D domain. The predicted parameters and stratigraphy are then used to predict the probability of potential pile tip damage, upon collision with a boulder.
The aim of the study is to infer the soil stratification from the provided CPT and borehole data. We infer the soil type at any location within the domain of interest from the SBT index Ic (Robertson, 2009). This index can be directly related to the CPT data through an empirical correlation model. In addition, the soil classes contained in the borehole logs can be expressed as bounds on Ic. A log-transformation was applied to Ic, Y = ln(Ic), and Y was modelled by a 3D Random Field, with a fully Bayesian hierarchical Gaussian Process model to explicitly capture uncertainties.
A significant number of new wind farms has to be installed and, at the same time, existing wind farms reaching the end of their planned life need to be reused efficiently to ensure that the ambitous goals for deploying offshore wind are met. Some relevant reuse alternatives for offshore wind farms are lifetime extension, repowering utilizing existing substructures and full replacement. In this presentation - starting from experience gained from extending the lifetime of the of the U1 metro viaduct in Berlin - we discuss end-of-life decision making in offshore wind. We focus particularly on issues concerning substructures and highlight existing challenges and opprtunities in research and development.
Nowadays geotechnical engineering firms have powerful software tools to extent their consulting business also into dynamic soil-structure interaction, which before has been restricted to a rather small community of specialized experts in this field, and they certainly do. This is particularly true with respect to non-seismic sources, that is all kinds of human induced vibrations. Hence, there is a demand from clients as well as from contractors to have guidance on the requirements as well as the limits of numerical modelling of soil-structure interaction. From the literature as well as from relevant standards, recommendations for the numerical modelling of soil-structure interaction problems involving seismic actions are well known, e. g. ASCE/SEI 4-16. There are, however, some particularities when dealing with human-induced vibrations, which are absent in seismic analyses. For human-induced excitations very little specific guidance has been published in the past. A machine foundation on a homogeneous half space excited by harmonic loads with excitation frequency between 4 Hz and 64 Hz has been analysed by means of several commercially available software packages. Parametric studies have been performed to verify if recommendations for seismic soil-structure analyses are valid for non-seismic analyses as well. This paper provides details on the benchmark example and the most important conclusions from the undertaken parametric studies.
Current standards like ISO 14837-32:2015 and DIN EN 1998-1/NA:2021 as well as prEN 1997-2:2022 allow for using correlations between the results of in-situ soil penetration tests and shear wave velocity (or shear modulus) to determine soil properties to be used in dynamic analyses. While the ISO and prEN standards even provide some recommendations on specific correlations to be used, the DIN standard does not. Due to the statistical nature of such correlations their general applicability has to be verified. We collected data sets from test sites from Germany as well as New Zealand at which cone penetration tests (CPT) as well as seismic site investigation methods were conducted. These sites comprise sandy soils as well as clayey soils, mixed soils as well as glacial soils. We compare the results of several correlations between CPT results and shear wave velocity. The accuracy of such correlations is assessed with respect to the accuracy of seismic in-situ tests. It turns out that for clean sands such correlations between CPT and Vs have a similar order of variability as seismic in-situ tests conducted at the same site. The higher the fines portion of the soil, the higher the variability of the statistical correlations, and consequently the less the general applicability. For glacial soils and other special soil types usage of statistical correlations to determine dynamic soil properties is not recommended.
Wir zeigen, dass bei homogenen ausgeprägt sandartigen Böden mit statistisch ermittelten Korrelationen die dynamischen Bodensteifigkeiten mit einer Genauigkeit abgeschätzt werden können, die mit der Ungenauigkeit der seismischen Verfahren übereinstimmt. Mit zunehmenden Feinkornanteil werden die Unsicherheiten der statistischen Korrelationen größer. Bei stark überkonsolidierten glazialen Böden sollte von der Anwendung empirischer Korrelationen Abstand genommen werden.
The Federal Institute of Material Research and Testing has performed many impact tests from very small laboratory tests to very big “free-field” tests with heavy containers on stiff foundations. The first measurements have been done on a big foundation where it should be guaranteed that the foundation is rigid and the container is tested properly. Later on, a smaller drop test facility has been built on the ground inside an existing building. It had to be controlled by prediction and measurements that the drop test will not damage the building. Tests from different heights on soft, medium, and stiff targets have been done to find out rules which allow to identify acceptable and unacceptable drop tests. Later on, the biggest drop test facility has been built for masses up to 200 t. It was necessary for the design of the foundation to estimate the forces which oc-cur during the drop tests. In addititon, the acceptable tests should be selected and controlled by measurements where the impact duration is important. Dif-ferent sensors, accelerometers, accelerometers with mechanical filters, geo-phones (velocity transducers), strain gauges, and pressure cells have been ap-plied for these tasks. Signal transformations and model calculations have been used to check and understand the dynamic measurements. The simplest law is the conservation of the momentum which is a good approximation if the impact is short. If the soil under the foundation has an influence on the deceleration of the container, the maximum foundation velocity is lower than the simple esti-mation.