7.2 Ingenieurbau
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (171)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (83)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (68)
- Posterpräsentation (10)
- Buchkapitel (4)
- Dissertation (4)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (3)
- Sonstiges (2)
- Tagungsband (Herausgeberschaft für den kompletten Band) (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (261)
- Deutsch (84)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
Schlagworte
- Structural Health Monitoring (26)
- Ground vibration (20)
- Structural health monitoring (15)
- Fatigue (14)
- Brücken (11)
- Monitoring (11)
- Offshore (11)
- Offshore wind energy (11)
- Hammer impact (9)
- Impact (9)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (346)
- 7.2 Ingenieurbau (346)
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (26)
- 7.4 Baustofftechnologie (24)
- 7.1 Baustoffe (13)
- 8.5 Röntgenbildgebung (8)
- 7.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (6)
- 8.6 Faseroptische Sensorik (6)
- 9 Komponentensicherheit (6)
- 3 Gefahrgutumschließungen; Energiespeicher (5)
- 3.3 Sicherheit von Transportbehältern (5)
- 8.2 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfmethoden für das Bauwesen (5)
- 9.3 Schweißtechnische Fertigungsverfahren (5)
- 8.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (4)
- 8.1 Sensorik, mess- und prüftechnische Verfahren (4)
- 2 Prozess- und Anlagensicherheit (3)
- 2.4 Prüfung und Bewertung von Explosivstoffen/Pyrotechnik (3)
- 2.5 Konformitätsbewertung Explosivstoffe/Pyrotechnik (3)
- VP Vizepräsident (2)
- VP.1 eScience (2)
- 5 Werkstofftechnik (1)
- 5.3 Polymere Verbundwerkstoffe (1)
- 7.3 Brandingenieurwesen (1)
- 7.6 Korrosion und Korrosionsschutz (1)
- 7.7 Modellierung und Simulation (1)
- 8.3 Thermografische Verfahren (1)
- 8.4 Akustische und elektromagnetische Verfahren (1)
- 9.4 Integrität von Schweißverbindungen (1)
Paper des Monats
- ja (5)
Structural health monitoring (SHM) of civil structures often is limited due to changing environmental conditions, as those changes affect the structural dynamical properties in a similar way like damages can do. In this article, an approach for damage detection under changing temperatures is presentedand applied to a beam structure. The used stochastic subspace-based algorithm relies on a reference null space estimate, which is confronted to data from the testing state in a residual function. For damage detection the residual is evaluated by means of statistical hypothesis tests. Changes of the system due to temperature effects are handled with a model interpolation approach from linear parameter varying system theory. From vibration data measured in the undamaged state at some few reference temperatures, a model of the dynamic system valid for the current testing temperature is interpolated. The reference null space and the covariance matrix for the hypothesis test is computed from this interpolated model. This approach has been developed recently and was validated in an academic test case on simulations of a mass-spring-damper. In this paper, the approach is validated experimentally on a beam structure under varying temperature conditions in a climate chamber. Compared to other approaches, the interpolation approach leads to significantly less false positive alarms in the reference state when the structure is exposed to different temperatures, while faults can still be detected reliably
Im AISTEC Projekt erforscht der FB 7.2 Verfahren zur Bewertung von Verkehrsbrücken auf der Gruandlage von sensorbasierten Bauwerksmessungen. In diesem Vortrag wird ein Überlick über die Forschungsarbeiten des FB 7.2 präsentiert. Des Weiteren wird ein Ausblick zur quantitativen Integration von sensorbasierten Bauwerksmessungen in die risiko-basierte prädiktive Planung von Inspektionen und Reparaturen von Ingenieurbauwerken gegeben.
Der Vortrag stellt die Durchführung und die ersten Ergebnisse der Belastungsfahrten der BAM im Rahmen des AISTEC Projekts an der Maintalbrücke am 19.05. und 20.05.2021 vor. Es wurden Tragwerksreaktionen des Bauwerks mit dem installierten Dauermonitoringsystem und insbesondere dem Betongelenk mit zusätzlich installierter Sensorik aufgezeichnet. Für die Ermittlung der Lastposition wurden mehrere Verfahren eingesetzt und verglichen.
Changes in the measured response of structural systems can be an indication of structural damages. However, such changes can also be caused by the effect of varying environmental conditions. To detect, localize and quantify changes or damages in structural systems subject to varying environmental conditions, physics-based models of the structural systems have to be applied which explicitly account for the influence of ambient conditions on the structural behavior. Data obtained from the structural systems should be used to calibrate the models and update predictions. Bayesian system identification is an effective framework for this task. In this paper, we apply this framework to learn the parameters of two competing structural models of a reinforced concrete beam subject to varying temperatures based on static response data. The models describe the behavior of the beam in the uncracked and cracked condition. The data is collected in a series of load tests in a climate chamber. Bayesian model class selection is then applied to infer the most plausible condition of the beam conditional on the available data.
Nach den bisherigen Regeln werden Bauwerksprüfungen von Brücken in starr definierten Intervallen durchgeführt. Diese starre, periodische, zustandsbasierte Instandhaltungsstrategie soll zukünftig durch eine flexible und prädiktive Instandhaltung ersetzt werden. Hierbei sollen Inspektionen und Instandhaltungsmaßnahmen unterstützt durch autonome Systeme auf der Grundlage von Monitoringdaten geplant und zusätzlich bei unvorhergesehenen Ereignissen ausgelöst werden. Im Rahmen des Verbundforschungsvorhabens AISTEC wird ein Vorgehen für Großbauwerke und kleinere Regelbauwerke zur Umsetzung eines kombinierten globalen, schwingungsbasierten und quasistatischen Monitorings entworfen. An der Maintalbrücke Gemünden – einer semiintegralen Rahmenbrücke aus Spannbeton auf der Schnellfahrstrecke Hannover–Würzburg – wurde als Demonstrator ein Dauermonitoring realisiert.
Changes in the measured response of structural systems can be an indication of structural damages. However, such changes can also be caused by the effect of varying environmental conditions. To detect, localize and quantify changes or damages in structural systems subject to varying environmental conditions, physics-based models of the structural systems have to be applied which explicitly account for the influence of ambient conditions on the structural behavior. Data obtained from the structural systems should be used to calibrate the models and update predictions. Bayesian system identification is an effective framework for this task. In this paper, we apply this framework to learn the parameters of two competing structural models of a reinforced concrete beam subject to varying temperatures based on static response data. The models describe the behavior of the beam in the uncracked and cracked condition. The data is collected in a series of load tests in a climate chamber. Bayesian model class selection is then applied to infer the most plausible condition of the beam conditional on the available data.
The reliability of deteriorating structures at time t is quantified by the probability that failure occurs within the period leading up to time t. This probability is often referred to as cumulative failure probability and is equal to the cumulative distribution function of the time to failure. In structural reliability, an estimate of the cumulative failure probability is obtained based on probabilistic engineering models of the deterioration processes and structural performance. Information on the condition and the loading contained in inspection and monitoring data can be included in the probability estimate through Bayesian updating. Conditioning the probability of failure on the inspection or monitoring outcomes available at time t (e.g. detections or no detection of damages) can lead to a reduction in that probability.
Such a drop in the cumulative failure probability might seem counterintuitive since the cumulative failure probability is a non-decreasing function of time. In this paper, we illustrate—with the help of a numerical example—that such a drop is possible because the cumulative probability before and after the updating is not based on the same information, hence not on the same probabilistic model.
The reliability of deteriorating structures at time t is quantified by the probability that failure occurs within the period leading up to time t. This probability is often referred to as cumulative failure probability and is equal to the cumulative distribution function of the time to failure. In structural reliability, an estimate of the cumulative failure probability is obtained based on probabilistic Engineering models of the deterioration processes and structural performance. Information on the condition and the loading contained in inspection and monitoring data can be included in the probability estimate through Bayesian updating. Conditioning the
probability of failure on the inspection or monitoring outcomes available at time t (e.g. detections or no detection of damages) can lead to a reduction in that probability.
Such a drop in the cumulative failure probability might seem counterintuitive since the cumulative failure probability is a non-decreasing function of time. In this paper, we illustrate—with the help of a numerical example—that such a drop is possible because the cumulative probability before and after the updating is not based on the same information, hence not on the same probabilistic model.