6.1 Oberflächen- und Dünnschichtanalyse
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (2)
- Vortrag (1)
- Posterpräsentation (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (4) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Synchrotron radiation (4) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (1)
Recent developments of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy using excitation energies different from the usual lab-sources Mg Kα and Al Kα, thus covering larger and different kinetic energy ranges, require more flexible approaches for determining the transmission function than the well-established ones using reference spectra. Therefore, the approach using quantified peak areas (QPA) was refined allowing a more precise estimation of the transmission function. This refinement was tested by comparing the results obtained with the new version with former calculations. Furthermore, the obtained transmission function was validated by comparing the results with a transmission function using the reference spectrum of polyethylene. Additionally, an ionic liquid was used as reference for estimating the transmission function at the energy resolved HE-SGM beamline at BESSY II. Comparison between the measured and stoichiometric composition shows that a transmission function was determined, which allows a reasonable quantification.
The recent development of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy using excitation sources different from the usual lab-source Mg Kα and Al Kα and spectrometers with more sophisticated lens systems requires flexible approaches for determining the transmission function. Therefore, the approach using quantified peak areas (QPA) was refined.1 A new algorithm allows a more precise estimation of the transmission function which could be shown by comparing the results obtained with the new version with former calculations. Furthermore, next to the established reference materials Cu, Ag and Au, ionic liquids can be used for estimating the transmission function at beamlines with variable excitation energies. Comparison between the measured and stoichiometric composition shows that a transmission function was determined which allows a reasonable quantification.
The fluorolytic sol–gel synthesis is applied with the intention to obtain two different types of core–shell nanoparticles, namely, SrF2–CaF2 and CaF2–SrF2. In two separate fluorination steps for core and shell formation, the corresponding metal lactates are reacted with anhydrous HF in ethylene glycol. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) confirm the formation of particles with mean dimensions between 6.4 and 11.5 nm. The overall chemical composition of the particles during the different reaction steps is monitored by quantitative Al Kα excitation X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Here, the formation of stoichiometric metal fluorides (MF2) is confirmed, both for the core and the final core–shell particles. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis by synchrotron radiation XPS (SR-XPS) with tunable excitation energy is performed to confirm the core–Shell character of the nanoparticles. Additionally, Ca2p/Sr3d XPS intensity ratio in-Depth profiles are simulated using the software Simulation of Electron Spectra for Surface Analysis (SESSA). In principle, core–shell like particle morphologies are formed but without a sharp interface between calcium and strontium containing phases.
Surprisingly, the in-depth chemical distribution of the two types of nanoparticles is equal within the error of the experiment. Both comprise a SrF2-rich core domain and CaF2-rich shell domain with an intermixing zone between them. Consequently, the internal morphology of the final nanoparticles seems to be independent from the synthesis chronology.
This presentation explains the outline and scientific content of the ISO technical report 23173 "Measurement of the thickness and nature of nanoparticle coatings using electron spectroscopies". This technical report deals with those electron spectroscopy methods that are able to determine the coating thickness of nanoparticles. This specifically includes X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), energy-resolved X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ERXPS) using synchrotron radiation, near abient pressure photoelectron spectroscopy (NAPXPS) and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES).