4 Material und Umwelt
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (66)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (38)
- Buchkapitel (16)
- Posterpräsentation (16)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (14)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (3)
- Monografie (2)
- Forschungsbericht (2)
- Sammelband (Herausgeberschaft für den kompletten Band) (1)
- Tagungsband (Herausgeberschaft für den kompletten Band) (1)
- Dissertation (1)
- Handbuch (1)
- Sonstiges (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (128)
- Deutsch (27)
- Spanisch (4)
- Französisch (2)
- Italienisch (1)
Schlagworte
- Ink (26)
- Archaeometry (19)
- XRF (16)
- Manuscripts (13)
- Inks (12)
- Raman spectroscopy (12)
- Reverse glass painting (11)
- DRIFTS (10)
- Manuscript (9)
- Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (9)
- Archäometrie (8)
- Coptic (8)
- Humboldt Codices (8)
- Non-destructive testing (8)
- Non-invasive analysis (8)
- VOC (8)
- Papier (7)
- Papyrus (7)
- Dead Sea Scrolls (6)
- Indoor air quality (6)
- Iron-gall ink (6)
- Ink analyses (5)
- Parchment (5)
- Reflectography (5)
- Zeichenmaterialien (5)
- ZfP (5)
- ATR (4)
- Cultural heritage (4)
- Ink analysis (4)
- Middle Ages (4)
- BEMMA (3)
- Cairo Genizah (3)
- Carbon ink (3)
- Drawings (3)
- ESEM (3)
- Emission reference materials (3)
- Herculaneum (3)
- Manuscript studies (3)
- Material science (3)
- Materials emissions test (3)
- Mixed ink (3)
- Museum (3)
- Non destructive analytical techniques (3)
- Non-destructiv testing (3)
- Pigment (3)
- Raman Spectroscopy (3)
- Rembrandt (3)
- Spectroscopy (3)
- Ultrafine particles (3)
- VOC-emission (3)
- XRF analysis (3)
- 3D inspection (2)
- Analytik (2)
- Antiquity (2)
- Arabic Recipes (2)
- CSMC (2)
- Chinese paper (2)
- Colourants (2)
- Dyes (2)
- Emission (2)
- Emission testing (2)
- FTIR (2)
- Farbmittel (2)
- Glasmalfarben (2)
- Glass scanning (2)
- Ink composition (2)
- Inkwells (2)
- Interdisciplinary approach (2)
- Lapis lazuli (2)
- Leather (2)
- Leonardo da Vinci (2)
- Manuskripte (2)
- Micro-XRF (2)
- Non invasive analysis (2)
- Odour (2)
- PGAA (2)
- PIXE (2)
- Perceived intensity (2)
- Persian manuscripts (2)
- Pigment analyses (2)
- Pigment identification (2)
- Pigments (2)
- Provenance studies (2)
- Raman (2)
- Restoration and conservation (2)
- Stained glass (2)
- Structured light scanning (2)
- Synthetic organic pigments (2)
- Thermal desorption (2)
- Umweltsimulation (2)
- VIS (2)
- Wasserzeichen (2)
- Writing inks (2)
- X-Ray fluorescence analyses (2)
- 13th century (1)
- 3D printing (1)
- A Greek palimpsest (1)
- ASAP-MS (1)
- ATR-FTIR (1)
- Air pollution (1)
- Air sampling (1)
- Alexander von Humboldt (1)
- Amate (1)
- Ancient INKS (1)
- Ancient document production (1)
- Antimony black (stibnite) (1)
- Arabic recipes (1)
- Archaeological provenance (1)
- Archaeometric studies (1)
- Archéométrie (1)
- Authentifizierung (1)
- Basin (1)
- Bauhaus (1)
- Bauhaus Weimar (1)
- Berliner Tuffsteinfassaden (1)
- Betondickglasfenster des Glockenturms am Eiermannbau (1)
- Biofilm (1)
- Biofouling (1)
- Black Ink (1)
- Black writing ink (1)
- Book production (1)
- Building material (1)
- Byzantine manuscript (1)
- Carolingian (1)
- Cascade impector (1)
- Chamber test (1)
- Chamber-test (1)
- Chinese Paper (1)
- Codex (1)
- Codex Miscellaneus (1)
- Codicology (1)
- Colorants (1)
- Colouring (1)
- Conservation (1)
- Coptic papyri (1)
- Coptic studies (1)
- Corrosion (1)
- DNA (1)
- Diffusive sampling (1)
- Dispay case (1)
- Dispersion of carbon pigments (1)
- Display case (1)
- Drawing (1)
- Dyes and pigments (1)
- Dynamic calibration gas mixtures (1)
- EDX Analysis (1)
- Early european inks (1)
- Egypt (1)
- Eisengallustinte (1)
- Emission reference material (1)
- Emission test chamber (1)
- Encre (1)
- Erfurt (1)
- FFF-3D printer (1)
- FFF-3D printing (1)
- FT-Raman (1)
- FTIR spectroscopy (1)
- FTIR-, XRF-, VIS- espectroscopia (1)
- Fakes (1)
- Family archives (1)
- Farbenlehre (1)
- Fibre analysis (1)
- Forgery (1)
- Fragmented manuscripts (1)
- Fälschungserkennung (1)
- Gas chromatography (1)
- Genizah du Caire (1)
- Giulio Romano (1)
- Glasanalyse (1)
- Gold (1)
- Gold mit Synchrotronstrahlung (1)
- Gothic incursions (1)
- Heat maps (1)
- Hebrew studies (1)
- Hellenistic (1)
- Herculaneum papyri (1)
- Hermopolis (1)
- Hinterglasmalerei (1)
- Historic ink (1)
- History of Art (1)
- Holy Family (1)
- IAQ (1)
- Illuminated manuscripts (1)
- In-situ analysis (1)
- Indoor air (1)
- Infrared thermography (1)
- Ink corrosion (1)
- Ink fingerprint (1)
- Ink terminology (1)
- Instrumental analysis of ink (1)
- Interdisciplinary (1)
- Iron gall ink (1)
- Jewish cultures (1)
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1)
- Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedächtniskirche (1)
- Kandelaber des Ensembles am Charlottenburger Tor (1)
- Kunsttechnologie (1)
- Lead books (1)
- Limitations (1)
- Manuscript making (1)
- Manuscripta Americana, Techialoyan (1)
- Manuscrits (1)
- Map production and publishing (1)
- Maps and colours (1)
- Mass spectroscopy (1)
- Material Analysis (1)
- Material analysis (1)
- Materials emissions testing (1)
- Medieval glasses (1)
- Medieval-stained glass (1)
- Methods of scientific analysis (1)
- Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) (1)
- Mixed Inks (1)
- Modern painting (1)
- Moriscos (1)
- Moyen-âge (1)
- NIR imaging (1)
- NIR reflectography (1)
- Nanobiocide (1)
- Nanocoating (1)
- Near-infrared refelctography (1)
- Non destructive (1)
- Non-destructive test (1)
- Non-invasive (1)
- Non-invasive scientific methods (1)
- Non-vitriolic iron-gall inks (1)
- Optical properties of ink (1)
- Painting (1)
- Palaeography (1)
- Palimpsest (1)
- Paper (1)
- Paper tinting (1)
- Paratext (1)
- Parerga (1)
- Pentimenti (1)
- Performance comparison (1)
- Pergamonmuseums (1)
- Persian manuscript (1)
- Poficiency test (1)
- Portrayal of St Joseph (1)
- Preservation (1)
- Proficiency Test (1)
- Protective glazing (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Quality assurance/quality control (1)
- Qumranrollen (1)
- RAMAN (1)
- RFA (1)
- Radiocarbon (1)
- Radiografische Untersuchung (1)
- Raphael school (1)
- Recipes (1)
- Red chalk (1)
- Reference material (1)
- Reference materials (1)
- Reverse painting on glass (1)
- Reverse paintings on glass (1)
- Reworking (1)
- Rötel (1)
- SERS (1)
- SVOC (1)
- Scanning micro-X-ray fluorescence (1)
- Schriftrollen vom Toten Meer (1)
- Schutzverglasung (1)
- Scribal corrections (1)
- Scythica Vindobonensia, (1)
- Sets of archaeometric data (1)
- Simulation (1)
- Sixteenth-century painting technique (1)
- Stained glasses (1)
- Sub-4nm particles (1)
- Synchrotron (1)
- Tanning (1)
- Tannins (1)
- Temple Scroll (1)
- Text analysis (1)
- Thermal imaging (1)
- Thermocouple (1)
- Thermographie (1)
- Tinting (1)
- Tomography (1)
- Torah (1)
- Torah Scrolls (1)
- Torah scrolls (1)
- Typology of Inks (1)
- UV-VIS Reflectance spectroscopy (1)
- UV-VIS reflectance spectroscopy (1)
- Uptake rate (1)
- VIS- Spektroskopie (1)
- VOC-Emission (1)
- VVOC (1)
- Vasari (1)
- Vienna manuscript (1)
- Vitrine (1)
- Vitriolic iron-gall inks (1)
- Vues des Cordillères (1)
- Writing Ink (1)
- Writing materials (1)
- X-Ray flourescence spectroscopy (1)
- X-Ray fluorescence (1)
- X-ray based techniques (1)
- X-rays (1)
- XRF Analysis (1)
- XRF imaging (1)
- XRF ink analysis (1)
- XRF-, FTIR-, VIS-espectroscopía (1)
- XRF-, VIS- FTIR-spectroscopy (1)
- XRF-, VIS- spectroscopy (1)
- Zeichnung (1)
- Zeichnungen (1)
- Zeolite (1)
- Zinc (1)
- historic inks (1)
- ink (1)
- papyrus (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 4.5 Kunst- und Kulturgutanalyse (162) (entfernen)
Paper des Monats
- ja (1)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (66)
The Cairo Geniza is an “archive” discovered in the 19th century in Ben Ezra Synagogue in Fustat, a district in Old Cairo (Egypt), located south of the center of modern Cairo. The giant collection of mostly Jewish documents that vary in genres, languages and writing supports contains a large number of early medieval Hebrew manuscripts, mostly in fragmentary form. The larger part of the Cairo Geniza is stored today in the Cambridge University Library (CUL).
The Geniza provides sources for the literary, linguistic, historical studies of the various aspects Jewish life. As the documents attest, at least two Jewish communities co-existed in Fustat up to 11th century: a so-called Babylonian and Palestinian. These communities had different leaders, different traditions and lived independently. The differences seem to manifest themselves also in the paleographical, codicological and some material properties of the manuscripts produced by each community.
The aim of this project is to compare the inks used in the Jewish documents depending on different variables: support (paper, parchment), purpose of the manuscript (legal, private, religious), provenance of the scribe. For the determination of the inks type and composition we had to choose non-invasive, non-destructive and portable techniques to analyse the corpus directly in the CUL.
The analyses were carried out with a mobile energy dispersive micro-X-ray spectrometer ArtTAX® (Bruker GmbH, Berlin, Germany), which consists of an air-cooled, low-power molybdenum tube, polycapillary X-ray optics (measuring spot size 70 µm in diameter), an electrothermally cooled Xflash detector, and a CCD camera for sample positioning (Bronk et al 2001, Hahn et al. 2010). All measurements are executed using a 30 W low-power Mo tube, 50 kV, 600 µA Mo tube, and with an acquisition time of 15 s (live time) to minimize the risk of damage (Fig. 1, 2).
Fig. 1: XRF spectrometer probe above a manuscript fragment
Fig. 2: Typical element profile of a XRF linescan
The Dino Lite digital stereomicroscope (Fig. 3) features built-in LED illumination at 395 nm and 940 nm and a customized external white light source. During use, the microscope is fastened to a small tripod or mounted on a Plexiglas ring holder that incorporates a white light source.
Fig. 3: Dino Lite digital stereomicroscope
Fig. 4: Details of one fragment (T-S 16.124) observed with the Dino microscope (x20). On the left, when illuminated with NIR (Near-Infrared, 940 nm) light, the ink fades, indicating iron-gall ink. On the right, the image under NIR light does not change. It is carbon ink.
On example of these studies is the manuscript T-S 16.124 (Cambridge University Library, Fig. 5) whom belongs to the third corpus. It is a deed, written in Hebrew, dated from 1328 (= 1017 CE) and witnessed by a very high number of people (6) comparing to the standard of similar documents (between 2 and 3), from at least two different Jewish communities in Fustat (trans congregational). The verso is written in Arabic (Bareket 1999).
Fig. 5: Manuscript T-S 16.124 (Cambridge University Library)
To compare the inks, we used the fingerprint model. This method relies on the determination of characteristic elemental compositions and represents the amount of a minor constituent relative to the main component, iron in iron gall ink (Malzer et al. 2004, Hahn et al. 2004, Rabin et al 2014). However, a calculation of a fingerprint based on XRF measurements is not possible in the case of carbon ink since carbon, its main component, cannot be detected with this technique.
Fig. 6: Ink fingerprint T-S 16-124 (recto) normalized to iron (Fe)
Conclusion
We show that using reflectography and XRF analysis it is possible to sort the inks according to their type. In the case of the iron-gall inks, use of the ink fingerprint, i.e. amount of the vitriol components normalized to iron we can make direct comparisons of the ink composition.
We would like also to stress that though the methods of material analysis listed above have been successfully employed in the field of cultural heritage and conservation including ancient and medieval manuscripts they have not yet been used to study fragments from the Cairo Genizah. Therefore, we believe that this research project is a pioneering study that will provide new insights into the history of Hebrew writing materials, their production techniques and materials and, thus, contribute new data to the field of Hebrew paleography.
This study focuses on the analysis of a corpus of manuscripts found in Fustat (medieval Cairo, Egypt) in the biggest medieval “archive” found until now: the Cairo Geniza. The giant collection of mostly Jewish documents has been attracting scholars’ attention a lot but so far, the material aspects of these documents seem to have been mainly neglected.
Application of scientific methods of analysis, especially X-Ray fluorescence characterization, contributes to our understanding of the materials used for production of manuscripts during the Middle ages.
Our corpus of the 11th century manuscripts comprises manuscripts written by scribes belonging to three Jewish communities that co-existed in Cairo during this period: the Karaites, the so-called Jerusalemites (or Palestinian) and the so-called Babylonians (or Iraqi), three different communities with different traditions and different leaders. The differences manifest themselves also in the paleographical properties of the manuscripts produced within each community. Can we extend the differences detected by the paleographical analysis to differences in composition of the writing materials and especially the composition of the inks? Or can we relate the differences in the composition to the manuscript type (legal, private...), or to another criterion. In this presentation, we offer answers to some of the questions using statistical analysis of the measurements results.
This study focuses on the analysis of a corpus of manuscripts found in Fustat (medieval Cairo, Egypt) in the biggest medieval “archive” found until now: the Cairo Geniza. The giant collection of mostly Jewish documents has been attracting scholars’ attention a lot but so far, the material aspects of these documents seem to have been mainly neglected.
Application of scientific methods of analysis, especially X-Ray fluorescence characterization, contributes to our understanding of the materials used for production of manuscripts during the Middle ages.
Our corpus of the 11th century manuscripts comprises manuscripts written by scribes belonging to three Jewish communities that co-existed in Cairo during this period: the Karaites, the so-called Jerusalemites (or Palestinian) and the so-called Babylonians (or Iraqi), three different communities with different traditions and different leaders. The differences manifest themselves also in the paleographical properties of the manuscripts produced within each community. Can we extend the differences detected by the paleographical analysis to differences in composition of the writing materials and especially the composition of the inks? Or can we relate the differences in the composition to the manuscript type (legal, private...), or to another criterion. In this presentation, we offer answers to some of the questions using statistical analysis of the measurements results.
While studying the socio-geographic history of inks, division 4.5 of the BAM (Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und Prüfung) together with the Centre for the Study of Manuscript Cultures in Hamburg has developed a protocol for ink analysis. It consists of a primary screening to determine the type of the ink and a subsequent in-depth analysis using several spectroscopic techniques: XRF, FTIR, and Raman. In most cases, we can obtain satisfactory results using a non-invasive protocol. However, mixed inks that contain no metals evade such a protocol. These inks constitute a heterogeneous group of media used especially in the Middle East and the Islamicate world since at least the 10th century; they are characterized by blending carbon ink and tannins, with or without the addition of vitriol.
Our own research aims primarily at recreating a socio-geographic history of inks, parchment, and papyrus and includes the comparative analysis of the writing materials of the Dead Sea Scrolls, ink and papyrus in Ancient and Hellenistic Egypt, and inks in documents from various contemporary medieval communities in Fustat (first nucleus of Cairo). During many years of study, we concluded that the continuous production of Coptic manuscripts from late Antiquity to the Middle Ages offers a unique opportunity for historical study of the ink in a large geographic area. Thanks to the collaboration with the ERC project “PAThs” (www.paths.uniroma1.it), based at the University of Rome La Sapienza, and within the activities of a PhD research dedicated to this topic, we therefore created a new branch of our project focused entirely on the analysis of Coptic inks, pigments, and dyes. This pioneering systematic study of writing materials coming from a specific area and time frame (5th-10th century) aims not only at a better understanding of the complex Coptic multicultural and plurilingual society, but also and mainly at clarifying the links among the Coptic and other societies between the ancient and medieval eras. Finally, it will cast light on the history of the technological development of inks in the eastern world, from Antiquity to the middle ages.
While studying the socio-geographic history of inks, division 4.5 of the BAM (Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und Prüfung) together with the Centre for the Study of Manuscript Cultures in Hamburg has developed a protocol for ink analysis. It consists of a primary screening to determine the type of the ink, and a subsequent in-depth analysis using several spectroscopic techniques. The XRF elemental analysis aims primarily at understanding the fingerprints of inks containing metals, making it possible to distinguish among different inks.
Our own research aims primarily at recreating a socio-geographic history of inks, parchment, and papyrus and includes the comparative analysis of the writing materials of the Dead Sea Scrolls, ink and papyrus in Ancient and Hellenistic Egypt, and inks in documents from various contemporary medieval communities in Fustat (first nucleus of Cairo). During many years of study, we concluded that the continuous production of Coptic manuscripts from late Antiquity to the Middle Ages offers a unique opportunity for historical study of the ink in a large geographic area. Thanks to the collaboration with the ERC project “PAThs” (www.paths.uniroma1.it), based at the University of Rome La Sapienza, and within the activities of a PhD research dedicated to this topic, we therefore created a new branch of our project focused entirely on the analysis of Coptic inks, pigments, and dyes. This pioneering systematic study of writing materials coming from a specific area and time frame (5th-10th century) aims not only at a better understanding of the complex Coptic multicultural and plurilingual society, but also and mainly at clarifying the links among the Coptic and other societies between the ancient and medieval eras. Finally, it will cast light on the history of the technological development of inks in the eastern world, from Antiquity to the middle ages.
The Cairo Genizah is a well-known “archive” discovered in the 19th century in Ben Ezra Synagogue in Fustat, a district in Old Cairo (Egypt), located south of the center of modern Cairo. The giant collection of mostly Jewish documents that vary in genres, languages and writing supports contains a large number of early medieval Hebrew manuscripts, mostly in fragmentary form. The larger part of the Cairo Genizah is stored today in the Cambridge University Library, containing about 200,000 fragments.
The Genizah provides sources for the literary, linguistic, historical studies of the various aspects Jewish and non-Jewish life. As the documents attest, at least two Jewish communities co-existed in Fustat up to 11th century: a so-called Babylonian and Palestinian. These communities had different leaders, different traditions and lived independently. The differences manifest themselves also in the paleographical properties of the manuscripts produced by each community.
Although Genizah manuscripts have attracted a great deal of scholarly attention, the material aspects of these documents seem to have been largely neglected. The current study aims to obtain information on the composition of the writing supports and the inks used, in order to obtain insights on trade, local production techniques and social structures.
Can we extend the differences detected by the paleographical analysis to differences in composition of the writing materials ? Can we relate the differences in the composition to a community, to the manuscript type (legal, private...), or to another criterion?
The quest for the mixed inks
(2018)
In this article, we would like to share our observations concerning the inks produced by intentionally mixing soot or charcoal with tannin extracts or iron-gall ink. Aside from Zerdoun’s mention in her outstanding review of written sources, “Les encres noires au Moyen-Âge”, this ink category has received little if any attention from scholars and scientists. And yet, if analytically attested, the use of such inks could serve as an additional category to classify and distinguish the writing inks on the historical socio-geographic map of the writing inks we are trying to build.
The mayor part of the Berlin collection `Manuscripta Americana´ consists of documents compiled by Alexander von Humboldt. The diversity of the written fragments and their shape presume few accordance concerning purpose, place or time of production. Even before the papers came to Berlin, manuscripts were copied, divided and collected by famous scholars also in Mexico. Back in Europe, Humboldt visited further collections and published the detected hieroglyphic writings altogether with cultural objects and landscapes in the book `Vues des Cordillères et Monuments des Peuples Indigènes de l`Amerique, voyage de Humboldt et Bonpland´, labelled corresponding to the cultural background.
By scientific and culture historical analyses, the Humboldt codices are revised and related to each other and others. In especial, the compilation of fragments shown on plate 36 in the book is looked at more closely. Whereas most of the plates represent only one sheet of painted amate paper, here segments with details of seven fragments are put together. It is tried to comprehend why these pieces are on one plate.
To find out a common feature of the documents, their content and represented form are compared. A correlation between some pieces is obvious and thus is also expected in the manufacture of the codices, in the kind of material used. For this the inks and colors are determined by scientific analysis including XRF-, Raman-, FTIR- and VIS- spectroscopy. Special material is detected and related to results of former analysis of codices written during the colonial period of America. Herewith a clear cultural assignment of the manuscripts is performed.
A relation of the fragments represented on plate 36 among each other and to other codices of the collection Manuscripta Americana in Berlin is discussed. Also, if the manuscripts are unique `originals´ or represent fragments of documents, whose corresponding pieces maybe found- in the best case- incorporated in other collections. We detected, that at least two of them can be put into relation to similar manuscripts deposited in Mexico. Further material analysis should clarify, if the corresponding pieces are identical- from one document, or if one of them is a copy. Herewith an approximation to authenticity features and history is issued.
Los Códices Humboldt, que proceden de la época colonial de Mexico, muestran:
1. colores indígenas típicos y sus mezclas:
cochinilla (rojo), índigo/ Azul Maya (azul y verde), carbón (negro),
zacatlaxcalli, mangle, colores orgánicos (amarillo)
2. influencia colonial:
tinta hierro- gálico para escribir
3. fragmentos distribuidos y cortados:
partes singulares forman parte de otros fragmentos dentro de la colección
(y en otras colecciones?)