4 Material und Umwelt
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Posterpräsentation (12) (entfernen)
Sprache
- Englisch (12) (entfernen)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (12)
Schlagworte
- PFAS (3)
- Combustion ion chromatography (2)
- Leaching (2)
- Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) (2)
- Adsorbable organically bound fluorine (AOF) (1)
- Antimony (1)
- Artificial ageing (1)
- Bottom ash (1)
- Combustion Ion Chromatography (1)
- Combustion ion chromatography (CIC) (1)
- Comsumer good samples (1)
- Construction products (1)
- DSLT (1)
- Extractable organically bound fluorine (EOF) (1)
- Geosynthetics (1)
- Ground water (1)
- Headspace GC-MS (1)
- High resolution-continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS-GFMAS) (1)
- Lysimeter (1)
- Micro plastic (1)
- Mikroplastik (1)
- Organo fluorine analysis (1)
- PAK (1)
- Passive sampling (1)
- Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) (1)
- Perfluorocarboxylic acid (PFCA) (1)
- Phosphorus (1)
- Plant-availability (1)
- Polyfluorinated alcohol (PFOH) (1)
- Remediation (1)
- SPE extraction (1)
- Schwermetalle (1)
- Sewage extraction (1)
- Sewage sludge (1)
- Soil (1)
- Soil extraction (1)
- Solubility (1)
- Sum parameter analyis (1)
- Surfacewaters (1)
- TED-GC/MS (1)
- Ultrashort PFAS (1)
- Wastewater (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 4.3 Schadstofftransfer und Umwelttechnologien (12) (entfernen)
Abstract: Since it is unknown for many applications, which PFASs are used and how they enter the environment, target analysis-based methods reach their limits. The two most frequently used sum parameters are the adsorbable organically bound fluorine (AOF) and the extractable organically bound fluorine (EOF). Both can be quantified using either combustion ion chromatography (CIC) or high resolution-continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS-GFMAS). Here we provide an insight on the advantageous and disadvantageous of both sum parameters and both detection methods. Our study is based on the analysis of surface water samples. Next to total fluorine (TF) analysis, AOF and EOF were determined as well as CIC and HR-CS-GFMAS are compared and results are comparatively discussed. Fluorine mass balancing revealed that, the AOF/TF proportion was higher than the EOF/TF proportion. The AOF made up 0.14–0.81% of TF and the EOF 0.04–0.28% of TF. Although, organically bound fluorine represents only a small portion of TF, PFASs are of worldwide concern, because of their extreme persistence and their bioaccumulation potential. The EOF-HR-CS-GFMAS method turned out to be more precise and sensitive than the AOF-CIC method and is a promising tool for future monitoring studies/routine analysis of PFASs in the environment.
Leachiing tests - a useful tool for the environmental impact assessment of construction products?
(2018)
Construction products and waste materials used for construction can be in contact with the environment and may release potential harmful compounds. Information on the total content of these substances in the product is not sufficient to assess its envrionmental impact since it does not consider realistic exposure conditions.The impact of these compounds is often assessed by using the total content in the product. This estimation lacks realistic exposure conditions.
Concerning the pathway to soil and groundwater by contact with rain or seepage water leaching tests, which were developed and standardized by the European Committee for Standardization, are available. While for secondary construction products and waste this investigation of the leaching behaviour is standard procedure and is already part of regulation in Germany (draft ordinance on reuse of mineral waste) and within Europe (landfill directive) the release from primary construction products got in the focus more recently. Several monitoring studies found unexpected high concentrations of substances used as herbicides and fungicides in surface water and stormwater originating from urban areas. As some of these compounds are even banned for the use in agricultural applications in Europe alternative sources as roof materials and façade coatings exposed to rain were suggested. Further field and laboratory tests confirmed construction products as sources of these substances in water.
The aim of this presentation is to show exemplary results of existing leaching methods and underline the strength and weaknesses of the test system with selected examples from our work. We especially draw the attention to the research which is still needed to close the gap between the results of leaching experiments and the subsequent risk assessment of the products.