3.1 Sicherheit von Gefahrgutverpackungen und Batterien
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (71)
- Posterpräsentation (38)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (30)
- Zeitschriftenheft (Herausgeberschaft für das komplette Heft) (20)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (11)
- Monografie (1)
- Dissertation (1)
- Sonstiges (1)
- Forschungsbericht (1)
Schlagworte
- Gefahrgutverpackungen (22)
- Dangerous goods packagings (20)
- Gefahrguttransport (20)
- Zulassungen (18)
- Anerkennungen (17)
- Gefahrgut (16)
- Richtlinien (16)
- Dangerous Goods Database (14)
- Datenbank GEFAHRGUT (14)
- Lithiumbatterien (14)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 3 Gefahrgutumschließungen; Energiespeicher (174)
- 3.1 Sicherheit von Gefahrgutverpackungen und Batterien (174)
- 4 Material und Umwelt (18)
- 4.3 Schadstofftransfer und Umwelttechnologien (17)
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (17)
- 7.5 Technische Eigenschaften von Polymerwerkstoffen (15)
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (14)
- 8.1 Sensorik, mess- und prüftechnische Verfahren (10)
- 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien (8)
- 5 Werkstofftechnik (7)
Paper des Monats
- ja (1)
Untersuchung der stoßartigen Freisetzung pulverförmiger Füllgüter aus Ventilsäcken für Gefahrgüter mit Innenventil. Fallprüfungen an einem Papiersack 5M2 mit zwei Füllgütern (Esplas H130 und Zinkoxid). Variation von Ventillänge, Fallhöhe und Füllgrad in Kombination mit der Anzahl der Fallversuche pro Prüfmuster. Bei Esplas H 130 war ein Pulveraustritt aus den Klebestellen bereits beim Befüllen zu verzeichnen. Dies ist ein Widerspruch zu UN 6.1.4.18.1 (Staubdichheit). Bei beiden Substanzen waren die Ventile aller Prüfmuster nach der Fallprüfung nicht mehr staubdicht. Es wird auf erste mögliche Lösungsvorschläge eingegangen.
Es werden die Ergebnisse von Leckageratenmessungen an den Verschlüssen von Gefahrgutverpackungen unterschiedlicher Bauarten vorgestellt. Die Prüfungen wurden mit dem Überdruckverfahren mit Ansammlung unter Verwendung des Prüfgases Helium vorgenommen. Die gemessenen Deckelleckageraten zeigen Größenordnungsunteschiede von mehreren Zehnerpotenzen. Durch einen Vergleich mit berechneten Grenzwerten lässt sich die Indentifizierung kritischer Bauarten vornehmen.
In practice, checks on dangerous goods transports often detect leaks of powdered dangerous goods from valved bags. In this work, the influence factors of a sudden release of powdery substances from the valves of valved bags were investigated.
Drop tests were performed on paper bags of UN design type 5M2 with internal sleeve valve using 2 different powdery substances (Esplas H130 and zinc oxide “Rotsiegel”).
The internal sleeve valves of all test samples were not sift‐proof with respect to both filling substances. For almost all test samples, the Esplas H130 powder already leaked out of pasted joints during manual filling. This is a contradiction to the requirement in UN 6.1.4.18.1, according to which closures and joints of paper bags 5M2 should be sift‐proof.
In the drop tests, longer valve lengths had a greater sealing effect for both filling substances (for filling degrees of at least 95% and for test samples which had already been mechanically loaded). As an extreme example, at the drop height of 1.20 m and a filling degree of 100%, the released amount of zinc oxide powder from a 10‐cm‐long valve was about 16 times higher than from a valve length of 12.5 cm.
The valve length is therefore a safety‐relevant parameter and should be specified by the manufacturer.
To ensure that only filling goods with similar physical properties in comparison with the test substance are used for valved bags, the user must be informed of the particle size of the test substance.
Häufig ist es wünschenswert, für neue Materialien oder Anwendungen künstliche Bewitterungsverfahren zu benutzen, die auf die spezifischen Anforderungen besser zugeschnitten sind, als es bei bestehenden standardisierten Verfahren der Fall ist. Nachdem man die spezifischen Parameter der Beanspruchung unter Anwendungsbedingungen und die spezifische Empfindlichkeit des Materials erfasst hat, beginnt ein Prozess, der als „Test Tailoring“ häufig abstrakt verwendet, auf den aber nur selten näher eingegangen wird. Genau dieser Prozess soll hier am Beispiel der Entwicklung eines künstlichen Bewitterungstests unter saurer Beaufschlagung, dem in der BAM entwickelten Acid Dew and Fog Test, beispielhaft erläutert werden.
In practice, checks on dangerous goods transports often detect leaks of powdered dangerous goods from valved bags. In this work, the influence factors of a sudden release of powdery substances from the valves of valved bags were investigated. Drop tests were carried out on paper bags of UN design type 5M2 with internal sleeve valve using two different powdery substances (Esplas H130 and zinc oxide “Rotsiegel”). The internal sleeve valves of all test samples were not sift-proof with respect to both filling substances. For almost all test samples, the Esplas H130 powder already leaked out of pasted joints during manual filling. This is a contradiction to the requirement in UN 6.1.4.18.1, according to which closures and joints of paper bags 5M2 should be sift-proof. In the drop tests, longer valve lengths had a greater sealing effect for both filling substances (for filling degrees of at least 95% and for test samples which had already been mechanically loaded). As an extreme example, at the drop height of 1.20 m and a filling degree of 100%, the released amount of zinc oxide powder from a 10 cm long valve was about 16 times higher than from a valve length of 12.5 cm. The valve length is therefore a safety-relevant parameter and should be specified by the manufacturer. To ensure that only filling goods with similar physical properties in comparison to the test substance are used for valved bags, the user must be informed of the particle size of the test substance.
In practice, checks on dangerous goods transports often detect leaks of powdered dangerous goods from valved bags. In this work, the influence factors of a sudden release of powdery substances from the valves of valved bags were investigated. Drop tests were carried out on paper bags of UN design type 5M2 with internal sleeve valve using two different powdery substances (Esplas H130 and zinc oxide “Rotsiegel”).
The internal sleeve valves of all test samples were not sift-proof with respect to both filling substances. For almost all test samples, the Esplas H130 powder already leaked out of pasted joints during manual filling. This is a contradiction to the requirement in UN 6.1.4.18.1, according to which closures and joints of paper bags 5M2 should be sift-proof.
In the drop tests, longer valve lengths had a greater sealing effect for both filling substances (for filling degrees of at least 95% and for test samples which had already been mechanically loaded). As an extreme example, at the drop height of 1.20 m and a filling degree of 100%, the released amount of zinc oxide powder from a 10 cm long valve was about 16 times higher than from a valve length of 12.5 cm. The valve length is therefore a safety-relevant parameter and should be specified by the manufacturer.
To ensure that only filling goods with similar physical properties in comparison to the test substance are used for valved bags, the user must be informed of the particle size of the test substance.
Sift-proofness is a requirement for different types of dangerous goods packagings for solid substances according to the international Dangerous Goods Regulations. In these regulations, a sift-proof packaging is defined as a packaging that is completely impermeable to dry contents. This means indirectly that absolutely no mass transport of solid substances is allowed. Moreover, this requirement applies both to the original filling substance and to fine solid material generated during transport. Further specifications, test conditions or tolerable limit values are not given. This is in contrast to physical principles and the usual practice in other fields of technology in which sift-proofness is relevant. This paper shows the necessary steps for how the requirements for sift-proofness of dangerous goods packagings can be defined more precisely. Physical basics of the term ‘sift-proofness’ are explained. A qualitative as well as a quantitative approach is possible. In any case, it is essential to carry out appropriate vibration tests to assess the siftproofness. There is a need for systematical investigations of the sift-proofness of dangerous goods packagings.