1.8 Umweltanalytik
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (6)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (1)
- Posterpräsentation (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (8)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (8)
Schlagworte
- Certified reference material (8) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (6)
Supplementary comparison study - measurement capabilities for the quantification of ethanol in water
(2022)
The accurate quantification of ethanol in water is essential for forensic applications such as blood and breath alcohol testing and for commercial applications such as the assessment of alcoholic beverages.
The intercomparison EURAMET.QM-S14 is part of a capacity building project named ALCOREF “Certified forensic alcohol reference materials”
that is running within the European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR). The intercomparison should allow project partners and other interested National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) and Designated Institutes (DIs) to benchmark their analytical methods for the quantification of ethanol in water. The study plan was agreed by the European Association of National Metrology Institutes (EURAMET) Subcommittee Bio- and Organic Analysis (SCBOA) and the Organic Analysis Working Group (OAWG) of the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM) in February and April 2019, respectively. The intercomparison was coordinated by BAM. Two concentration levels relevant for the calibration and verification of evidential breath alcohol analysers were distributed to study participants. Fifteen institutes from 15 countries registered for the intercomparison and returned results. Participants mostly applied gas chromatography with flame ionisation detection (GC-FID) or mass spectroscopy (GC-MS), one participant used titrimetry and one participant employed a test bench for breath analyser calibration (“bubble train”). Participants did either in-house purity assessment of their commercial ethanol calibrants by Karl-Fischer titration, chromatographic methods, quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (qNMR) and/or density measurements; or they used ethanol/water Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) from NMIs/DIs for calibration.
CCQM OAWG agreed to use a consensus value from participants results that utilizes the reported uncertainties as Key Comparison Reference Value (KCRV). The Gaussian Random effects model with Hierarchical Bayesian solution (HB-REM) is a reasonable approach in this case. The KCRVs and Degrees of Equivalence (DoEs) were calculated with the NIST consensus builder version 1.2 Hierarchical Bayes procedure.
Successful participation in the interlaboratory comparison has demonstrated the capabilities in determining the mass fraction of ethanol in aqueous matrices in the range 0.1 mg/g to 8 mg/g. Fourteen out of 15 participants have successfully quantified both samples, one participant successfully quantified only the lower-level (0.6 mg/g) sample.
The poster presents the main achievements of the capacity building project ALCOREF “Forensic alcohol reference materials”. The project was part of the European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR).
Altogether 43 certified ethanol in water reference materials (CRMs) in the mass fraction range of 0.1 to 7 mg/g were developed by project partners. These CRMS are suitable for the calibration and verification of evidential breath alcohol analysers according to the requirements of the International Organisation of Legal Metrology (OIML). Furthermore, 10 new or improved Calibration and Measurement Capability (CMC) claims for purity assessment of ethanol and ethanol quantification were prepared. Newly established measurement capabilities and the new CRMs were successfully tested in three intercomparisons conducted as official intercomparisons of EURAMET Technical Committee for Metrology in Chemistry.
The presentation provides an overview of the EMPIR project ALCOREF “Certified forensic alcohol reference materials”. Results of an EURAMET intercomparison of ethanol in water reference materials developed in the project are presented, and two different statistical models for the key comparison reference function are discussed, the Frequentist approach and a Bayesian approach.
The presentation summarizes the results of the EURAMET key comparison QM-S13 “Comparison of value assigned forensic alcohol in water reference materials”. Possible options for the key comparison reference function (KCRF) are discussed: the frequentist approach and a Bayesian approach. Both methods are used to determine the degrees of equivalence of materials and participants.
The presentation summarizes the results of the EURAMET key comparison QM-S14 “Measurement capabilities for the quantification of ethanol in water”. Possible options for the key comparison reference value (KCRV) are discussed. A Bayesian approach is finally used to estimate the KCRV and the degrees of equivalence of participants.