Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Abgas (1)
- Arrhenius model (1)
- Certified reference materials (1)
- DIN (1)
- Direct metal assay (1)
- ERM (1)
- Erdgas (1)
- Gas-Normale (1)
- High-purity elements (1)
- Impurity assessment (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
ISO Guide 35 deals with RM stability issues and scrutinizes the evaluation of stability testing results under the assumption that either there is no trend at all (a rather rare situation), or any observed deterministic change is insignificant and thus can be neglected. However, market demands for reliable reference materials are obviously not limited to stable or at least seemingly stable materials. In many analytical applications, analytes and measurands under consideration are known, or at least suspected, to be unstable on time scales that may vary widely from measurand to measurand. The Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) has developed (and successfully uses) an integrated approach in its certification practice. The approach is based on an initial stability study and subsequent post-certification monitoring. Data evaluation is model-based and takes advantage of all information collected in the stability testing scheme(s). It thus allows one to deal with any kind of instability observed, to assess limiting time intervals at any stress condition in the range tested, to estimate a final expiry date for materials with detected instabilities or the maximum admissible re-testing interval for seemingly stable materials, and to assess maximum admissible stress loads during delivery of the material to the customer. The article describes (and exemplifies) typical study layout, the model selection, and the integrated data assessment.
For the first time, an international comparison was conducted on the determination of the purity of a high purity element. Participants were free to choose any analytical approach appropriate for their institute’s applications and services. The material tested was a high purity zinc, which had earlier been assessed for homogeneity and previously used in CCQM-K72 for the determination of six defined metallic impurities. Either a direct metal assay of the Zn mass fraction was undertaken by EDTA titrimetry, or an indirect approach was used wherein all impurities, or at least the major ones, were determined and their sum subtracted from ideal purity of 100 %, or 1 kg/kg. Impurity assessment techniques included glow discharge mass spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and carrier gas hot extraction/combustion analysis. Up to 91 elemental impurities covering metals, non-metals and semi-metals/metalloids were quantified. Due to the lack of internal experience or experimental capabilities, some participants contracted external laboratories for specific analytical tasks, mainly for the analysis of non-metals. The reported purity, expressed as zinc mass fraction in the high purity zinc material, showed excellent agreement for all participants, with a relative standard deviation of 0.011 %. The calculated reference value, w(Zn) = 0.999 873 kg/kg, was assigned an asymmetric combined uncertainty of + 0.000025 kg/kg and – 0.000028 kg/kg. Comparability amongst participating metrology institutes is thus demonstrated for the purity determination of high purity metals which have no particular difficulties with their decomposition / dissolution process when solution-based analytical methods are used, or which do not have specific difficulties when direct analysis approaches are used. Nevertheless, further development is required in terms of uncertainty assessment, quantification of non-metals and the determination of purity of less pure elements and/or for those elements suffering difficulties with the decomposition process.
Zusammen mit der Genauigkeit von Messungen ist die ihnen zugeordnete Messunsicherheit Ausdruck und Maß von Vergleichbarkeit und Richtigkeit. Die Messunsicherheit spielt ebenso die Schlüsselrolle im Aufbau einer Rückführbarkeitskette, wie in diesem Beitrag beschrieben. Es ist der vierte und letzte Teil einer Artikelserie (siehe Infokasten), die Einblicke gibt in die Arbeit des DIN-Normenausschusses „Gasanalyse und Gasbeschaffenheit“ (DIN NA 062-05-73 AA) sowie der international tätigen Technical Committees 158 und 193 der ISO.
In vielen industriellen High-Tech Verfahren und Prozessen, Forschung und Wissenschaft, Medizin und Umwelttechnik werden Sondergase eingesetzt.
Als Gattungsbegriff umfasst diese Bezeichnung ein ansehnliches Spektrum höchster Qualitäten an Gasen. Dazu gehören u. a. Reinstgase mit besonders hohen Anforderungen an ihre Reinheit, Gasgemische genau definierter Zusammensetzung und Isotopengemische. Wie genau kann man Gaszusammensetzungen heute messen? Wie schafft man es, dass alle dasselbe messen? Welche Techniken kommen dabei zum Einsatz?