Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Permeation (3)
- Dangerous goods packagings (2)
- Gefahrgutverpackungen (2)
- Überdruck (2)
- Air change (1)
- Bubble test (1)
- Chemical compatibility testing (1)
- Container (1)
- Dangerous goods (1)
- Dangerous goods packaging (1)
- Data loggers (1)
- Datenlogger (1)
- ESCR (1)
- Environmental stress cracking (1)
- Explosionsfähiges Gemisch (1)
- Explosive atmosphere (1)
- Frachtcontainer (1)
- Freight container (1)
- Freight containers (1)
- Gauge pressure (1)
- Gefahrguttransport (1)
- HDPE (1)
- Klimamessfahrt (1)
- Leak (1)
- Leakproofness test (1)
- Lower explosive limit (1)
- Luftwechselrate (1)
- Normal conditions of carriage (1)
- Normale Beförderungsbedingungen (1)
- Overpressure (1)
- Packagings for dangerous goods (1)
- Relative Ausdehnung (1)
- Relative expansion (1)
- Solvents (1)
- Ultrashort pulse laser (1)
- Untere Explosionsgrenze (1)
Barrieren manchmal notwendig
(2008)
The objective of this experiment was to verify that in regards to the leakproofness bubble test for packagings of dangerous goods, a reduction of the air overpressure from 0.2 to 0.1 bar can be compensated for by reducing the water surface tension to a value of approximately 33.2 mN/m by adding a wetting agent. It was experimentally proven that this method will yield the same leak diameters. This is important to avoid irreversible deformations during the leaktesting of intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) while using a test overpressure of 0.2 bar.
Bubble test experiments were carried out on artificial borehole-shaped leaks manufactured of two different materials high density polyethylene (HDPE) and stainless steel by ultrashort pulse laser technology and with two different immersion test liquids (deionized water and a 0.1% Lutensol FSA fabric softener active 10 solution). The characteristic diameters of the boreholes investigated were from 11.5 to 30.3 µm in length.
The key point within the scope of this research project was to find out whether there was a risk of creating an explosive atmosphere by permeation of flammable liquid compounds during transport of dangerous goods in freight containers under normal conditions of carriage. Therefore, all aspects that had an influence on the formation of such an atmosphere had to be considered. The most important influencing factors were permeation, air change in the freight container and ambient temperature. The first step was to investigate the permeation with different packaging materials, charge and temperatures. Furthermore, the air change rates of different freight containers were measured. A few climate tests with containers on ships, e.g. to Singapore, were performed to assess normal conditions of carriage. Another important point was measuring the solvent (toluene) concentration in the gas phase in a freight container loaded with plastic intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) filled with toluene. To confirm that the measured values were in the right range, the toluene concentration in the gas phase in a container was calculated with different packaging materials, air change rates and temperatures.
The results of the measurements and calculations have shown that safety layers in the packaging wall, e.g. the copolymer of ethylene and vinyl alcohol (EVOH) and polyamide, can reduce the rate of permeation by more than a decimal power, but the lower explosive limit of toluene is easily reached within a few hours at 40°C charge temperature if there is no barrier.
Ermittlung explosionsfähiger Gemische beim Gefahrguttransport unter normalen Beförderungsbedingungen
(2009)
The objective of this work was to determine the maximum gauge pressure in the vapour phase above the liquid in different design types of dangerous goods packagings under normal conditions of carriage. The design types investigated were steel and plastic packagings with a volume of approximately 6 l.
Two different methods were applied. In method 1, the pressure inside the packaging filled with a certain filling substance (dichloromethane) was directly measured under simulated conditions of carriage (degree of filling: 90%; filling temperature: 15°C; temperature during storage: 31°C). The maximum measured gauge pressures were between 89 mbar for a light plastic jerrican and 336 mbar for a steel drum.
In method 2, the gauge pressure was calculated. The consideration of a rigid packaging combined with the assumption of a vapour pressure of zero during filling and sealing can serve as a worst case scenario. The calculated gauge pressure is approximately 1061 mbar. This procedure leads to the highest safety factor and does not require any experimental investigations.
For a more realistic approximation of the gauge pressure of a non-rigid packaging, a packaging-specific function of relative expansion can be used, which is determined by a hydraulic pressure test. The calculated values ranged from 105 to 347 mbar. Method 2 provides conservative results. No hazardous filling substance is needed, and it allows a prediction of gauge pressure for other temperatures, substances and filling degrees. Therefore, this method could serve as alternative to UN Model Regulations 6.1.5.5.4 (a).
Der innere Überdruck, der sich unter Beförderungsbedingungen im freien Dampfraum einer Gefahrgutverpackung bildet, die mit einer gefährlichen Flüssigkeit gefüllt ist, hängt von verschiedenen Faktoren ab: Den spezifischen Stoffeigenschaften des jeweiligen Füllguts, dem Füllgrad, der Nachgiebigkeit der Verpackungsbauart, der Befülltemperatur und der Temperatur bei Beförderungsbedingungen.
Zu den normalen Beförderungsbedingungen von befüllten Gefahrgutverpackungen zählt der interkontinentale Transport in Frachtcontainern. Es werden die Ergebnisse einer Klimamessfahrt vorgestellt, die mit einem instrumentierten Frachtcontainer auf der Fahrt von Hamburg nach Singapur und zurück gewonnen wurden. Hierdurch lassen sich durchschnittliche und maximale Beförderungstemperaturen beim interkontinentalen Containertransport ermitteln. Es werden Modellgleichungen vorgestellt, mit denen sich für verschiedene Annahmen der sich einstellende Überdruck in einer Gefahrgutverpackung berechnen lässt.
Safety risks may ensue when the chemicals contained in polyethylene packagingsa age and damage them. To prevent subsequent accidents, the European Dangerous Goods Regulations have laid down requirements for testing the chemical compatibility of liquid dangerous goods transported in polyethylene packagings. The test procedures include 6 months in which the chemical is prestored in the packaging. After this time, the respective design-type tests are performed. Alternative methods with so-called standard liquids, simulating the different types of damaging effects, are also possible. If a packaging has successfully passed the design type tests with a standard liquid, other dangerous goods may also be transported in this packaging, as long as it is demonstrated that they have a less damaging effect than the standard liquid. However, in this area there is only little information and research available.
A new potentially effective and time-saving method for comparing the stress crack damaging influence of liquids with standard liquids was proposed by a major German chemical company.
The validation of this method, which was carried out on two polyethylene materials, showed the general applicability of the method. Two kinds of wetting solutions were applied to simulate cracking under stress.
The influence of prestorage, test temperatures, wetting agents and material was examined. FEM calculations were carried out to ascertain the influence of the sample shape.