Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- POD (12)
- Zuverlässigkeit (7)
- Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (6)
- Endlagerung radioaktiver Abfälle (3)
- ROC (3)
- Reliability (3)
- Austenitic Tube Welds (2)
- Essential Parameters (2)
- European Standards (2)
- Film Digitalization (2)
- Modulares Modell (2)
- Performance Demonstration (2)
- Radiographic Testing (2)
- Reliability of NDE Systems (2)
- Ultrasonics (2)
- 4-Eye Principle (1)
- Automation Bias (1)
- Bayes'sches updating (1)
- Bayesian Approach (1)
- Bayesian statistics (1)
- CWA07 (1)
- Demining (1)
- Detection technology (1)
- EFNDT Arbeitsgruppe 5 (1)
- Eddy current testing (1)
- Eye Tracking (1)
- Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) (1)
- Feldtests (1)
- Flaw Detection (1)
- Gefahrstoffe (1)
- Gefahrstoffnachweis (1)
- Hazardous and toxic gasses and vapours (1)
- Human Factor (1)
- Human Factors (1)
- Human factors (1)
- In-Service Inspection (ISI) (1)
- Kontrollen (1)
- Metal Detector Test Trials (1)
- Metal detectors (1)
- Metalldetektor (1)
- Mine Detection (1)
- Modular Model (1)
- Multi-gas sensor (1)
- Multi-parameter (1)
- Multiparameter-POD (1)
- NDT reliability (1)
- Nondestructive testing (1)
- Nuclear Power Plants (1)
- Nuclear Waste Storage (1)
- Nuclear waste (1)
- Phased array (1)
- Probability (1)
- Probability of Detection (1)
- Probability of Detection (POD) (1)
- Probability of detection (POD) (1)
- Prohability of Detection (1)
- ROC diagrams (1)
- RT (1)
- Radiographic testing (1)
- Radiography (1)
- Real defect testing (1)
- Receiver Operating Characteristics (1)
- Reliability of NDE (1)
- Reliability tests (1)
- Sicherheit (1)
- TRL-UT (1)
- Test and evaluation (1)
- Threats other than explosives (1)
- Time Pressure (1)
- Transmit receive longitudinal (TRL) (1)
- Ultrasonic (1)
- Ultrasonic testing (1)
- Visual testing (1)
- Warfare substances (1)
- Zuverlässigkeit in der Minensuche (1)
The reliability investigations are dedicated to throw light on the performance of the NDE system with
respect to the required aim. This is especially of interest when digitized and processed signals are
involved where it becomes hard to assess whether the quality of the system has raised or not. Three
different ways to investigate reliability of NDE signals will be described. The first way of investigation,
the performance demonstration, is preferred e.g. in the US American nuclear power industry. This is an
integral consideration of the non destructive test as a system where the whole NDE system is packed in a
black box and only the input in terms of the real existing flaws in the component is considered and
compared to the output in terms of the indications of the human inspector or of the automated system.
The second the European tradition relies on a standardized description of physical/technical
parameters of the NDE system which are preconditions for successful system performance. An example
for such a standardized set of performance parameters is given in the recently released standard about Xray
film digitization CEN EN 14096. The third approach the modular conception is a marriage of
both: The signal chain is cut into main modules. Each module is assessed in a most appropriate
individual way e.g. via modeling calculations. The single results are joint together according to the
reliability of the subsystems. Separating criteria for the system were proposed through a reliability
formula developed during a series of European-American workshops on NDE reliability. Examples of
all three approaches will be given.
Das Basisanliegen - Einleitung
Mit der zunehmenden Zahl akkreditierter ZfP-Firmen und zunehmender Anwendung risikobasierender Konzepte ergibt sich die Notwendigkeit, internationale Standards wie die DIN EN ISO 17025 und darüber hinausgehende Richtlinien bei der Verfahrensauswahl in der ZfP zu berücksichtigen. Dieser Aufsatz soll aufzeigen, welche internationalen Aktivitäten gegenwärtig für die Zuverlässigkeitsbetrachtungen von Bedeutung sind (siehe auch [1]). In Übereinstimmung mit den Vereinbarungen und Definitionen der European-American Workshops zur Zuverlässigkeit [2, 3] gilt: Das Basisanliegen der Zuverlässigkeitsuntersuchungen beliebiger diagnostischer Systeme besteht darin, den Grad festzustellen mit dem das Prüfsystem in der Lage ist, seinen vorgesehenen Zweck zu erfüllen. Im Falle der ZfP besteht dieser Zweck zumeist in der Aufgabe, Bauteildefekte aufzufinden und zu beschreiben bzw. die Defektfreiheit von Bauteilen zu bestätigen, sowie Wanddicken zu messen oder Material zu charakterisieren.
Das Basisanliegen der Zuverlässigkeitsuntersuchungen findet seinen Niederschlag bei folgenden international relevanten Aktivitäten:
neue ISO 17025 als Notwendigkeit mit variablen Möglichkeiten der Verfahrensvalidierung
als Kettenglied in RBLM (Risk Based Life Time Management) (r) EPERC-Initiative
CEN/TC138/WG9 "Qualifizierung von ZfP-Verfahren"
Six-Sigma Strategie: als notwendiger Bestandteil
ASNT-Initiative: Standing Committee on NDE Reliability: als Arbeitspaket
Produkthaftung: als notwendige Voraussetzung für die Handhabung
During the second European-American Workshop on NDE Reliability, September 99 in Boulder, the term NDE reliability was defined as the degree that an NDT system is capable of achieving its purpose regarding detection, characterization and false calls. The most common but also most expensive - way to determine this degree of capability in e.g. defect detection is to make just a performance demonstration using realistic test samples and to count the correct detections and false calls. For a more efficient way of reliability evaluation we propose to decompose the system into main modules e.g. according to the reliability formula set up on the first workshop: into f(IC) a function of IC the intrinsic capability, determined by the physics and the technique of the NDE method representing an ideal upper bound of the reliability and g(AP) a function of AP the industrial application factor like surface state or limited access to a component in general diminishing the ideal capability and finally h(HF) the function of the human factor which is in general also diminishing the ideal capability. The workshop proposed a rather plain mathematical shape for the formula R = f(IC) g(AP) h(HF) which should be considered merely as a philosophical expression but not as exact mathematical formula to be applied for evaluation of e.g. POD data. We propose to decompose the NDE system into modules in terms of functions of IC, AP and HF if appropriate or additional ones if necessary and then to analyze the mutual relationships of the terms via fault tree analysis. Finally the total reliability of the system is composed of the reliability of the subsystems via the rules of statistical systems theory.
First trials for this approach of data analysis will be presented via examples from NDE systems in the aerospace industry.