Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (94)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (16)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (8)
- Forschungsbericht (6)
- Monografie (1)
- Buchkapitel (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (126) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- XPS (15)
- Welding (9)
- Residual stress (8)
- Nanoparticles (6)
- NEXAFS (5)
- Additive manufacturing (4)
- CCQM (4)
- Fluorescence (4)
- Low transformation temperature (4)
- Residual stresses (4)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 9 Komponentensicherheit (16)
- 9.4 Integrität von Schweißverbindungen (12)
- 6 Materialchemie (10)
- 6.1 Oberflächen- und Dünnschichtanalyse (8)
- 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien (7)
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (4)
- 9.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (4)
- 1.4 Prozessanalytik (3)
- 7.2 Ingenieurbau (3)
- 9.2 Versuchsanlagen und Prüftechnik (3)
Paper des Monats
- ja (3)
27Al nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of polycrystalline aluminium borate 9Al2O3 · 2B2O3 have been measured in double rotation at 11.7 and 7.0 T and high-speed magic-angle spinning at 7.0, 9.4, 11.7, 14.1 and 17.6 T. Spinning sidebands from the satellite transitions were observed at 7.0 and 14.1 T. Each of the four structural aluminium sites [Al(IV), Al(V)(1), Al(V)(2) and Al(VI)] are observed, characterised and assigned in the spectra. The obtained parameter set gives a fully consistent interpretation in agreement with the crystal structure of the compound.
Results of an interlaboratory comparison of XPS data obtained with stainless steel are presented. Only one photoelectron spectrometer model was used. The stainless-steel sample surfaces were analysed in different states by XPS: as received, after sputtering to I(C 1s)/I(Fe 2p3/2) 0.025 and after removing a chromium-enriched oxide layer following a certain protocol. The Fe, Cr and Ni elemental concentrations were evaluated from the respective XPS data submitted by the participants of the interlaboratory test experiment. Total means, repeat standard deviations (sr) and reproducibility standard deviations (sR) are presented. The best reproducibility standard deviations were obtained for the XPS analysis after removal of a chromium-enriched oxide layer and quantification of the XPS intensities without taking the contamination elements of carbon and oxygen into account. The absolute reproducibility standard deviation of the elemental concentrations in that case is as small as 1.1-1.5 at.%. This gives 2%, 6% and 16% for the relative reproducibility standard deviation of the concentrations of iron, chromium and nickel, respectively. The total means of the iron, chromium and nickel concentrations finally obtained agree within 2sR with bulk values determined by wavelength-dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Comparison to an earlier interlaboratory test experiment shows that using only one model of photoelectron spectrometer reduces the reproducibility standard deviations efficiently. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Apparently that the type testing procedure should be conducted under the conditions ensuring reproducibility of its outcomes. We investigated various factors effecting upon the reproducibility. To obtain quantitative characteristics of indications visibility the image-processing hard-and software were used. It was established that there are two main groups of these factors. The first depends on the differences between various test panels, which are used for type testing. The second one concerns the reproducibility of some stages of penetrant testing procedure (excess penetrant removing and developer application). The recommendations to increase the reproducibility of type testing are developed and illustrated experimentally.
The determination of penetrant system sensitivity as a part of type testing should be conducted ensuring reproducibility of the result. We investigated some factors effecting the reproducibility. To obtain quantitative characteristics of indications visibility, an image processing system was used [1]. We used 3 different sets of reference blocks (rb1, rb2, rb3) corresponding to type 1 of EN ISO 3452-3 [2]. Two fluorescent penetrants with different sensitivities and the same wet solvent developer were used.
It was established that the reproducibility of type testing is influenced by mainly two principal factors. First there are the differences between reference blocks. Second one concerns the reproducibility of penetrant testing procedure, especially excess penetrant removal and developer application.
According to EN ISO 3452-3 a reference block for determination of sensitivity level of fluorescent penetrants consists of a set of three nickel-chrome plated panels with 10, 20 and 30 µm plating thickness. Transverse cracks are made in each panel by stretching the panels in the longitudinal direction and width to depth ratio of the cracks should be approximately 1/20. Each panel presents a certain sensitivity level, which is characterised by the level of visibility of the indication. The highest level 3 corresponds to the panel with 10 µm thickness plating. Each panel is cut longitudinally (perpendicular to the crack) so that 2 sheets (panels A and B) with nearly the same cracks will be produced. These panels A and B of a reference block are used for relative evaluation, for example to compare sensitivities of two penetrants. It is considered that the application of the same penetrant to both panels with subsequent adequate development results in the same visibility of the indications on these panels.
Quantitative correlations between the abilities of the reference blocks used for determining of the sensitivity were obtained in our investigations. We used the relations between the measured values of light-fluxes from the indications of similar comparing areas on two panels. These indications correspond to certain cracks parts of the same total length on both comparing areas. The relations of the steps between the panel are responsible for the definition of the sensitivity groups. From our investigations it follows that the steps of the different sets are different. Besides it was established that the indications visibility for the same penetrant applied on different reference blocks might have a considerable difference depending on the penetrant sensitivity: the higher penetrant sensitivity, the smaller is such a difference between the steps 30/20 and 20/10. For example, for rb3 the relations 30/20 and 20/10 for lower sensitive penetrant (I1) reached factor 3 comparing with factor 2 for higher sensitive penetrant (I2).
Some results of the comparison between the 3 sets (rb1, rb2, rb3) investigations are summarised in Table 1 with rb1 as a reference.