Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (7)
- Posterpräsentation (6)
- Vortrag (4)
- Monografie (1)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (1)
- Dissertation (1)
Schlagworte
- Reverse glass painting (13)
- Raman spectroscopy (12)
- DRIFTS (10)
- Non-invasive analysis (6)
- Synthetic organic pigments (3)
- Archaeometry (2)
- Hinterglasmalerei (2)
- Kunsttechnologie (2)
- Non invasive analysis (2)
- Pigment identification (2)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (4)
Die Zusammensetzung der Malfarben Heinrich Campendonks in ihrer Kombination aus Farbpigmenten, Bindemitteln und Metallpulvern ist bislang nahezu unerforscht. Lediglich
für wenige Leinwandgemälde des Künstlers liegen publizierte Untersuchungen zu den Farbmitteln vor. Materialanalysen zu den Hinterglasarbeiten des Malers fehlten bisher. Im Rahmen eines Forschungs- und Restaurierungsprojektes im Zeitraum von 2014 bis 2016 wurden naturwissenschaftliche Untersuchungen an ausgewählten Hinterglasbildern durchgeführt, deren Ergebnisse in diesem Aufsatz vorgestellten werden. Die Untersuchungen erfolgten zunächst nicht-invasiv mit VIS-Spektroskopie, Röntgenfluoreszenzanalyse sowie Ramanspektroskopie, weiterhin mit Licht- und Fluoreszenzmikroskopie, Rasterelektronenmikroskopie mit energiedispersiver Röntgenmikroanalyse, Fourier-Transformations-Infrarotspektroskopie, Raman-Mikroskopie und Gas-Chromatografie/Massenspektrometrie.
We present the first spectroscopic study on a reverse glass painting form the classic modern period (1905-1955). Marianne Uhlenhuth’s painting “Ohne Titel, 1954” shows characteristics like experimental use of colorants and abstract compositions, which are well-established in classic modern art. Compared to stained glass, reverse glass paintings are viewed in reflected light, hence they reveal strong and intense colors. New inorganic pigments, development of synthetic organic pigments and the simultaneous supersession of well-known ancient colorants result in experimental works and remarkable pigment mixtures in this period of time. An in-situ, non-invasive approach was used to study the pigments and binding media. In-situ measurements were carried out using Raman spectroscopy (i-Raman®Plus, Bwtek Inc., 785 nm, 20× objective, resolution 4 cm-1), X-ray fluorescence (Tracer III-SD, Bruker AXS Microanalysis GmbH, 40 kV, 15 μA), VIS spectroscopy (SPM 100, Gretag-Imaging AG) and DRIFTS: Diffuse Reflection-Infrared-Fourier-Transform Spectroscopy (ExoScan, Agilent GmbH, 4000-650 cm-1, 256 scans, resolution 4cm-1). The pigments consist of inorganic as well as organic materials. Phthalocyanin green (PG7, colour index No. 74260), viridian and emerald green were used for the green areas. The yellow parts consist of chrome yellow and cadmium yellow. Pigment Yellow 1 (C.I. 11680) was used for the dark yellow/orange part. Red areas were characterized by the presence of cadmium and selenium (cadmium red) in the XRF spectrum. Ultramarine was detected in the blue parts. Concerning the violet color PR81 (bluish red, C.I. 45160:1) in mixture with PG7 (bluish green) were identified as main components. We want to outline that PR81 was rarely found in paintings. It was only recorded in the palettes of Lucio Fontana and Mary Cassatt before. The dark violet areas consist of Prussian blue and an unknown red (organic) colorant. Brown iron oxide was identified as the brown pigment. Bone black in mixture with black iron oxide were used as black materials and zinc white and titanium white as white pigments. XRF analysis of the metal color yields intense copper, zinc and nickel peaks (intensity ratio 3:3:1), which corresponds to “new silver” alloy. Barite and chalk are the fillers in this painting. Results of DRIFTS spectra show gum sometimes mixed with protein or oil (metal soaps) as binding media. The results point out that reverse glass paintings from the classic modern period are excellent examples to study the evolution of new pigments and their acceptance in artist’s palettes.
The technique of painting on the reverse side of glass was rediscovered by artists in the 20th and gained especially in Germany strong popularity. Compared to other techniques (e.g. canvas, mural paintings), the paint layers are applied in reverse succession. The paintings are viewed in reflected light, thus revealing an impressive gloss, luminosity, and depth of color. Reverse glass paintings comprise a non-porous glass substrate and multi-layered paint system, hence delamination of the paint layer is the most common disfigurement. Scientific investigation of the material provides important information for appropriate conservation concepts. Transport of the precious and fragile objects to the lab is often not feasible. Therefore, in-situ, non-invasive analysis is necessary to analyze colorants and binders. Based on modern reverse glass paintings, we clarify advantages and limitations of mobile Raman spectroscopy for the identification of colorants. We compare the use of mobile Raman spectroscopy with other methods of our mobile lab (i.e. X-ray fluorescence (XRF), Diffuse Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (DRIFTS).
Development of a methodical approach for in-situ analysis of modern reverse paintings on glass
(2018)
The technique of painting on the reverse side of glass was rediscovered by artists in the early 20th century and gained great popularity, especially in Germany. In contrast to other paint techniques (e.g. panel and mural painting), the paint layers are applied in reverse succession starting with the foremost paint layer and ending with the primer (backmost layer). The paintings are viewed in reflected light, thus revealing an impressive gloss, luminosity and depth of colour.
Scientific investigation of the material provides important information for appropriate conservation concepts. Transport of the precious and fragile objects to the lab is often not feasible. Therefore, in-situ, non-invasive analysis is necessary to analyse colorants and binders. However, some analytical problems need to be considered: due to the reverse paint stratigraphy in reverse paintings on glass, the measured layer is always the backmost one. The analytical possibilities are extremely reduced, when the back is covered by a metal foil (or by paper, carton etc.). However, measurements through the glass (using Raman and VIS) can still yield information on the colourants of the front layer.
When the paint layer is accessible, we start our procedure using X-ray fluorescence (Tracer III-SD, Bruker AXS Microanalysis GmbH, 40 kV, 15 μA) and VIS reflectance spectroscopy (SPM 100, Gretag-Imaging AG). Both techniques provide first information on the inorganic colourants. Raman measurements (i-Raman®Plus, Bwtek inc., 785 nm, 50× objective, resolution 4 cm-1) are then carried out to clarify uncertain XRF measurements and to identify synthetic organic pigments (SOP). Diffuse Reflection-Infrared-Fourier-Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS; ExoScan, Agilent GmbH, 4000–650 cm-1, 500 scans, spectral resolution 4 cm-1) is used for the classification of the binders. Moreover, it may help to identify SOP, when fluorescence dominates the Raman signal. This analytical sequence yields the best results, when time is the limiting factor.
We present two in-situ studies of the paintings “Kreuzabnahme” (1914-15) by Carlo Mense and “Stadt am Morgen” (1921) by Walter Dexel. The painting “Kreuzabnahme” is an outstanding piece in Mense’s ɶuvre, because the glass plate was painted on both sides (Fig. 1). The results of the back-side show mainly inorganic pigments: basic lead white, talc, red and brown ochre, cinnabar, chrome yellow, viridian, ultramarine blue, Prussian blue and bone black. The classification of binding media using DRIFTS yields positive results for drying oil. Acrylic resin could be identified in two areas, resulting from a previous restauration treatment. For the front side painting, Mense used basic lead white, cinnabar, chrome yellow and umbra as pigments and oil as binder.
Measurements of the abstract painting “Stadt am Morgen” by Walter Dexel show zinc white, basic lead white, chalk, cinnabar, red lead, strontium yellow, cadmium yellow, cobalt blue, Prussian blue, ultramarine blue, brown ochre and bone black as pigments. Moreover, synthetic alizarin (PR83) was identified as dark red colorant. The results of DRIFTS classify oil as binding media.
We conclude that, the use of complementary spectroscopic methods yields the best results for in-situ analysis of reverse paintings on glass.
The quest for the mixed inks
(2018)
In this article, we would like to share our observations concerning the inks produced by intentionally mixing soot or charcoal with tannin extracts or iron-gall ink. Aside from Zerdoun’s mention in her outstanding review of written sources, “Les encres noires au Moyen-Âge”, this ink category has received little if any attention from scholars and scientists. And yet, if analytically attested, the use of such inks could serve as an additional category to classify and distinguish the writing inks on the historical socio-geographic map of the writing inks we are trying to build.
The technique of painting on the reverse side of glass was rediscovered by artists in the early 20th century. The artist group “Der Blaue Reiter” around Wassily Kandinsky and Franz Marc got in touch with this technique in 1908 and 1909. In the following years it gained great popularity, especially in Germany. Nevertheless, the technique has not received its due appreciation in art history. It was considered as stained glass. However, the paint layers are applied cold, hence this artistic technique doesn’t involve a firing step.
Our multidisciplinary project investigates the art historic backgrounds, the painting techniques and materials of modern reverse paintings on glass. More than 1000 paintings from ~100 artists were discovered in the framework of our project. A selection of 60 paintings could be analyzed using non-invasive, in-situ methods such as Raman and VIS spectroscopy, Diffuse Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (DRIFTS) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF). In this paper we want to point out the key role of Raman spectroscopy for our research. It offers the unique opportunity to measure paint layers from both sides. (front = through the glass; reverse = directly on the paint layer).
The technique of painting on the reverse side of a glass panel was rediscovered by German artists at the beginning of the 20th century. In contrast to other paint techniques (e.g. panel and mural painting), the paint layers are applied in reverse succession starting with the foremost paint layer and ending with the primer (backmost layer). The paintings are viewed in reflected light, thus revealing an impressive gloss, luminosity and depth of colour. The artist group “Der Blaue Reiter” (the Blue Rider) around W. Kandinsky and F. Marc got in touch with this technique in the summers of 1908 and 1909 and spread their knowledge in different regions. Our pioneering project is tracing this transfer of knowledge by a multidisciplinary approach in terms of art history, painting technology and material science. More than 100 artists and >1000 reverse paintings on glass (1905-1955) were identified during the project. This numbers clearly point out that this technique was by far more important for modern art than previously assumed. In-situ, non-invasive measurements (XRF, Raman, VIS, DRIFTS) on a well-considered selection of 67 paintings reveal the broad palette of colorants ranging from traditional to experimental materials. Special attention is paid on artists who are strongly connected to Berlin. Demonstrative examples by W. Dexel, G. Muche and L. Hildebrandt are used to discuss analytical challenges and highlights.
The technique of painting on the reverse side of a glass panel was rediscovered by German artists at the beginning of the 20th century. They appreciated the impressive gloss, luminosity, and depth of colours in this genre. Compared to stained glass, the distinctive properties of this technique are: (1) the paint is applied “cold”, hence, it doesn’t involve a firing step, (2) reverse paintings on glass are framed and always viewed in reflected light and (3) the reverse paint stratigraphy is different from canvas paintings, starting with the front most layer and ending with the backing layer. In 1908 several artists, including Gabriele Münter, Wassily Kandinsky, Heinrich Campendonk, August Macke and Franz Marc of the “Der Blaue Reiter” (the Blue Rider) collective took an interest in this technique and started to share their interest with other colleagues in Europe. Our pioneering project is tracing this transfer of knowledge by a multidisciplinary approach in terms of art history, paint technology and material science. More than 100 artists and >1000 reverse paintings on glass were identified during the project. This high number of objects clearly points out that this technique was by far more important for modern art than previously assumed. In-situ, non-invasive measurements (XRF, Raman, VIS, DRIFTS) on a well-considered selection of 67 paintings reveal the broad palette of colorants ranging from traditional to experimental. Special attention is paid to the impact of synthetic organic pigments (SOP) in artists palette. Demonstrative examples by W. Kandinsky, L. G. Buchheim and F. Jespers are used to discuss analytical challenges and highlights.
A non-invasivemethod has been carried out to show the capabilities and limitations of Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS) for identifying of colourants and binders in modern reverse glass paintings. For this purpose, the reverse glass paintings “Zwei Frauen am Tisch” (1920–22), “Bäume” (1946) (both by Heinrich Campendonk), “Lofoten” (1933) (Edith Campendonk-van Leckwyck) and “Ohne Titel” (1954) (Marianne Uhlenhuth), were measured. In contrast to other techniques (e.g. panel and mural painting), the paint layers are applied in reverse succession. In multi-layered paint systems, the front paint layer may no longer be accessible. The work points out the different spectral appearance of a given substance (gypsum, basic lead white) in reverse glass paintings. However, inverted bands, band overlapping and derivative-shaped spectral features can be interpreted by comparing the spectra fromthe paintingswith spectra frompure powders and pigment/linseed oil mock-ups. Moreover, the work focuses on this method's capabilities in identifying synthetic organic pigments (SOP). Reference spectra of three common SOP (PG7, PY1, PR83) were obtained from powders and historical colour charts.We identified PR83 and PY1 in two reverse glass paintings, using the measured reference spectra. The recorded DRIFTS spectra of pure linseed oil, gum Arabic, mastic, polyvinyl acetate resin and bees wax can be used to classify the binding media of the measured paintings.
This work presents a technical investigation of two Chinese reverse glass paintings from the late 19th and early 20th centuries. A multi-analytical, non-invasive approach (X-ray fluorescence (XRF), diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS), Raman spectroscopy) was used to identify the pigments and classify the binding media. The results reveal a combined use of traditional Chinese and imported European materials. Several pigments like cinnabar, lead white, orpiment, carbon black and copper-arsenic green (probably emerald green) were found in both paintings; red lead, artificial ultramarine blue, Prussian blue and ochre appear in at least one of the paintings. The proof of limewash (calcite and small amounts of portlandite) as a backing layer in Yingying and Hongniang indicates that clamshell white was also used for reverse glass paintings. Drying oil was classified as a binding media in most areas of both paintings. However, the orange background of The Archer yielded prominent bands of both proteinaceous and fatty binder.