Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Referierte Publikation
- nein (5)
Schlagworte
- Adhesive strength (2)
- Bonding strength (2)
- Centrifuge technology (2)
- Haftfestigkeit (2)
- Multi-sample approach (2)
- Adhesion (1)
- Centrifuge test (1)
- Klebfestigkeit (1)
- Mehr-Proben-Prüfen/Kleben (1)
- Messtechnik (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Auf dem Weg zu Industrie 4.0: Bestimmung von Messunsicherheitsbudgets in der Oberflächentechnik
(2019)
Vorgestellt wurde die Bestimmung von Messunsicherheitsbudgets für sehr unterschiedliche physikalische Größen, die in der Oberflächentechnik von hoher Relevanz sind: Stufenhöhe h, Schichtdicke d, Eindringhärte HIT und Haftfestigkeit. Die Unterschiede betreffen die Art der Prüfmethodik (optisch zerstörungsfrei vs. mechanisch invasiv/zerstörend), die laterale Größe des Integrationsgebietes der Messung (lokal: nano bis sub-mikro vs. global: mikro bis makro) und die Art der Bestimmung von Messunsicherheitsbudgets (physikalische Größen: direkt rückführbar; Werkstoffkenngröße: genormt; Systemkenngröße: genormt).
Im Rahmen von Industrie 4.0 werden ausgehend der geforderten Spezifikation des beschichteten Produkts (Mittelwert mit Vertrauensbereich oder Mindestwert) durchgehende Toleranzbänder zur Oberflächenmodifizierung/Beschichtung des Substrats, einhergehend mit Prozessfenstern, die diese Toleranzbänder garantieren, erforderlich, die zuverlässig erfasst werden müssen. Die Frage der anzuwendenden Mess- und Prüftechnik und die damit notwendige Betrachtung von Messunsicherheitsbudgets ist für die Digitalisierung von Konditionierungs-, Zustands-, Regel- und Steuergrößen unverzichtbar. Mit Blick auf die Einhaltung von Prozessfenstern und die dafür notwendige Prozessführung wird technologisches Kern-Know-how digitalisiert, das es unbedingt zu schützen gilt. Nur lokale Netze können diese Sicherheit garantieren, in globalen Netzen ist die Datensicherheit bestenfalls maximierbar
Multiple-sample approach: reliable ranking and validated statistics of bonding and adhesive strength
(2014)
Bonding strength of adhesive-bonded joints and adhesive strength of coatings have been exclusively determined in
single-sample tests using a tensile testing machine. Necessarily, the single-sample approach was also applied to the
corresponding bonding procedure. As a consequence, reliability and reproducibility of results were restricted. By
applying the newly introduced centrifuge technology, the multiple-sample approach was realized for simultaneous
tensile testing of up to eight samples under identical conditions without any disturbing shear-force effects. In order to
introduce the multiple-sample approach into the bonding procedure, a hydraulic bonding set-up was developed which
enables identical bonding pressure also for slightly different heights of sample assemblies. Both sample approaches
were compared for various application examples: ranking of different classes of adhesives, validated statistics of
adhesive-bonded joints using one particular adhesive and effects of cleaning and plasma-treatment on the adhesive
strength of coatings. The investigated systems included glass, metals and polymer substrates, different adhesives,
metallic and dielectric coatings on polymers.
Multiple-sample approach: reliable ranking and validated statistics of bonding and adhesive strength
(2014)
Bonding strength of adhesive-bonded joints and adhesive strength of coatings have been exclusively determined in single-sample tests using a tensile testing machine. Necessarily, the single-sample approach was also applied to the corresponding bonding procedure. As a consequence, reliability and reproducibility of results were restricted. By applying the newly introduced centrifuge technology, the multiple-sample approach was realized for simultaneous tensile testing of up to eight samples under identical conditions without any disturbing shear-force effects. In order to introduce the multiple-sample approach into the bonding procedure, a hydraulic bonding set-up was developed which enables identical bonding pressure also for slightly different heights of sample assemblies. Both sample approaches were compared for various application examples: ranking of different classes of adhesives, validated statistics of adhesive-bonded joints using one particular adhesive and effects of cleaning and plasma-treatment on the adhesive strength of coatings. The investigated systems included glass, metals and polymer substrates, different adhesives, metallic and dielectric coatings on polymers.
Standardised conventional adhesion tests are time-consuming single-sample tests. Moreover, except for the pull-off test, all these tests provide only qualitative or semi-quantitative (ranking, respectively measurement of an adhesion-correlated quantity) information on adhesion. Sometimes, adhesion is evaluated even under compressive stress conditions (e.g. cross-cut and scratch test), which itself is a contradiction to adhesive strength as defined in terms of tensile force per area.
For optical coatings it has been shown that the pull-off test in a centrifuge is definitely a promising alternative with respect to the reliable, fast and quantitative determination of adhesive strength in N/mm2. The force-controlled centrifuge test is the only multiple-sample test which provides reliable quantitative information on the adhesive strength in agreement with DIN EN 15870 and DIN EN ISO 4624 on a statistical basis for up to eight samples simultaneously tested under identical testing conditions.