Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (37)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (37) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Ground vibration (8)
- Bahnerschütterungen (4)
- Building vibration (4)
- Erschütterungsminderung (3)
- Container loading (2)
- Dispersionsmessung (2)
- Drop test (2)
- Elastische Elemente (2)
- Elastische Gleiselemente (2)
- Emission (2)
- Erschütterungen (2)
- Erschütterungsprognose (2)
- Foundation load (2)
- Hammer impact (2)
- Layered soil (2)
- Railways (2)
- Slab track (2)
- Train passage (2)
- Train-induced ground vibration (2)
- Tunnel (2)
- Vehicle-track-soil interaction (2)
- Vibration measurements (2)
- Wellengeschwindigkeit (2)
- 2-span bridge (1)
- Achsimpulse (1)
- Amplituden-Abstands-Gesetze (1)
- Apartment building (1)
- Attenuation (1)
- Axle impulses (1)
- Axle pulses (1)
- Axle-sequence spectrum (1)
- Bahngleis (1)
- Ballast track (1)
- Base isolation (1)
- Bauwerk-Boden-Wechselwirkung (1)
- Bodenschlitz (1)
- Bodenübertragungsfunktion (1)
- Cars (1)
- Damage detection (1)
- Deckeneigenfrequenzen (1)
- Deckenschwingungen (1)
- Displacements (1)
- Dämpfung (1)
- Einfügungsdämmung (1)
- Elastische Gebäudelagerung (1)
- Erschütterungen im Fernfeld (1)
- Erschütterungsausbreitung (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Excitation forces (1)
- Fahrzeug-Fahrweg-Boden-Wechselwirkung (1)
- Filter effects (1)
- Finite element models (1)
- Flexibility (1)
- Floors (1)
- Footbridge (1)
- Foundations (1)
- Freight train (1)
- Frequency response function (1)
- Gebäudelagerung (1)
- Gebäudemodelle (1)
- Gebäudeschwingungen (1)
- Geometrie (1)
- Gleiströge (1)
- Ground vibration measurements (1)
- Halbraum (1)
- High-rise buildings (1)
- High-speed train (1)
- Immission (1)
- Impedanzmethode (1)
- Inertial interaction (1)
- Irregular ballast (1)
- Irregular soil (1)
- Irregularities (1)
- Kinematic interaction (1)
- Kraft auf den Boden (1)
- Layered soils (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Measurements (1)
- Mitigation (1)
- Modal load spectrum (1)
- Modes and waves (1)
- Movin load test (1)
- Normung (1)
- Office tower (1)
- Passenger train (1)
- Pfahlnachgiebigkeiten (1)
- Pile groups (1)
- Prediction (1)
- Prognose (1)
- Railbridge (1)
- Railway (1)
- Railway bridge (1)
- Railway tracks (1)
- Railway trafiic (1)
- Railway tunnel (1)
- Randelementmethode (1)
- Randomly heterogeneous soil (1)
- Rayleighwellendispersion (1)
- Rechenmodelle (1)
- Rechenverfahren (1)
- Richtige Fahrzeugmasse (1)
- Scattering (1)
- Schienenfahrweg (1)
- Schienenfahrwege (1)
- Simple and fast prediction (1)
- Soil-pile interaction (1)
- Soil-wall floor model (1)
- Spektralanalyse (1)
- Störgrößen (1)
- Surface line (1)
- Surface-tunnel reduction (1)
- Train configuration (1)
- Train excitation (1)
- Train passages (1)
- Train speed (1)
- Tran speed (1)
- Transfer fuction (1)
- Transmission (1)
- Tunnel line (1)
- Tunnelstrecke (1)
- Varying soil stiffness (1)
- Varying track stiffness (1)
- Vibration measurement (1)
- Vollraum (1)
- Wellenausbreitung (1)
- Wellenausbreitung in der Tiefe (1)
- Wellenfeldberechnung (1)
- Zuggeschwindigkeit (1)
- elastische Gebäudelagerungen (1)
- zerstreute Achslastimpulse (1)
- Übertragungsmatrizen (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (37) (entfernen)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (37) (entfernen)
Three measurement campaigns of train-induced ground vibrations are evaluated for the vehicle-track-soil interaction. Ground vibrations, track vibrations and vehicle vibrations have been measured for train passages and impulse excitation and compared with theoretical results. The soil and the track-soil system are calculated by wavenumber integrals. The influence of the vehicle is introduced by a substructure method. By comparing theory and measurement the different components of excitation force and ground vibration can be analysed, the quasi-static excitation, track-alignment errors, the out-of-roundness of wheels, the wheel and rail roughness, and moreover, scattered axle impulses and ineffective high-frequency parts of the wheelset accelerations and Forces.
Two measurement campaigns of train-induced ground vibrations are evaluated for the vehicle-track-soil interaction. Ground vibrations, track vibrations and vehicle vibrations have been measured for train passages and impulse excitation and compared with theoretical results. The soil and the track-soil system are calculated by wavenumber integrals. The influence of the vehicle is introduced by a substructure method. By comparing theory and measurement the different components of excitation force and ground vibration can be analysed, the quasi-static excitation, track-alignment errors, the out-of-roundness of wheels, the wheel and rail roughness, and moreover, scattered axle impulses and ineffective high-frequency parts of the wheelset accelerations and forces.
The passage of the train is dominated by the impulses of the static axle loads. The response of the regular homogeneous and irregular soils has been calculated by the finite-element method in frequency domain. The superposition of the impulse responses yields the quasi-static component of the ground vibration which is restricted to very low frequencies and to the close near-field of the track. In case of an irregular soil or ballast of which the stiffness varies randomly in space, a mid-frequency ground vibration component is generated by the scattering of the axle impulses. Measurements will be shown which prove the existence of the mid-frequency ground vibration component and the unique explanation by the scattered axle impulses: many international measurements with a raised mid-frequency component, axle-box measurements with a too low mid-frequency dynamic load, amplitude-speed dependencies which are incompatible with irregularity-induced dynamic loads, and ground vibration reductions due to stiff track elements.
Die gesamte Prognose wurde rechnerisch erfasst. Die Rechenverfahren sind einfach und schnell. Die Emission und die Immission verwendet Übertragungsmatrizen. Die Transmissionsrechnung beruht auf der Dispersion der Rayleighwelle. Die Verknüpfung erfolgt über die Anregungskraft auf den Boden und über die Freifeldamplitude am Gebäude.
Es sind viele Eingabemöglichkeiten für Messdaten vorgesehen. Messungen können von einem Ort auf einen anderen Ort übertragen werden.
A study on building vibrations has been performed by finite element calculations. Family houses, multi-storey residential buildings, office buildings and office towers have been modelled in detail. The frequency-dependent response due to a free-field excitation has been evaluated for walls, columns and floors. The ratio of building amplitudes to free-field amplitudes starts with uB/u0 = 1 at zero frequency and is usually lower than 1 at 50 Hz, the end of the frequency range considered here. In between, amplifications occur due to several reasons. There are „soil resonances“ where the whole building is vibrating on the compliant soil, “column resonances” where the upper storeys are vibrating on the compliant columns, and the “floor resonances” where the floors are vibrating excited by their supports. Results are presented for all building types, but a special focus is set on office buildings. A parameter study shows the influence of the stiffness of the soil, the number of storeys, and the width of the building. It has been found that the “soil resonance” is strongly modified by the low-frequency floor resonances for the normal office building. The main resonance of a twenty-storey office tower is determined equally by the “soil mode” and the “column mode”. It is an important observation for these office buildings that the resonances can differ for different parts of the building such as the centre, the edge, the corner, and the core of the building. This leads to non-uniform vibration modes across the building, which look like another type of “floor resonance” and which have been observed in several real building projects. Experimental results will be shown which can confirm the calculated phenomena.
Eindimensionale Modelle des Gleises aus einem Schienenstützpunkt, zweidimensionale Modelle enthalten die Kraftverteilung der Schiene. Eindimensionale Modelle machen einen Fehler, weil sie eine zu große Fahrzeugmasse berücksichtigen. Man kann jedoch bei der Berechnung der Minderungswirkung von Gleiselementen eindimensionale Gleismodelle verwenden, um die Kraftübertragung des Gleises bzw. die Minderungswirkung des Gleises zu berechnen. Die Wechselwirkung mit dem Fahrzeug kann einfach mit der dynamischen Stützpunktsteifigkeit berechnet werden. Dabei muss die Stützpunktsteifigkeit mit einer charakteristischen Gleislänge multipliziert werden, die frequenz- und systemabhängig ist.
Prediction of building noise and vibration – 3D finite element and 1D wave propagation models
(2021)
Construction work or traffic excite nearby buildings, and the perceptible or audible vibration can be a nuisance for the inhabitants. The transfer of the vibration from the free field to the building has been calculated by the finite element method for many models in consultancy and research work. The analysis for all storeys of certain building points such as walls, columns and floors unveiled some rules, some typical modes, and some wavetype responses. A simplified building-soil model has been created, which includes well these effects of building-soil resonance, wall/column resonance, floor resonances, and the high-frequency reduction. The model consists of one wall for a wall-type apartment building or a column for each specific part (mid, side or corner) of a column-type office building. The building response in the high-frequency (acoustic) region is calculated as mean values over all storeys and over wider frequency bands, by wave-type asymptotes of an infinitely tall building, and by the soil to wall ratio of impedances. The secondary noise is predicted by Transfer values between the building vibration (center of floors, walls at a room corner) and the sound pressure.
Die Linienlastgesetzmäßigkeit gilt nicht für Zuganregung. Die Punktlastgesetzmäßigkeit wird bei kurzen Zügen in größeren Entfernungen erreicht. Bei langen Zügen reduziert sich die Abnahme um r-0,3 für die theoretische exponentielle Dämpfungsabnahme, um r-0,5 für die vereinfachte potentielle Dämpfungsabnahme. Die gemessenen Abnahmereduktionen liegen in diesem Bereich.
Zur Erschütterungsausbreitung an oberirdischen Bahnlinien gibt es gute Übereinstimmungen zwischen Messungen und der Theorie geschichteter Böden. Bei der Interpretation der Ergebnisse spielt die Rayleigh-Welle eine große Rolle. Je nach Frequenz und Wellenlänge hat die Rayleigh-Welle eine bestimmte Eindringtiefe und erreicht damit mehr oder weniger steife Bodenschichten. Damit bekommt man eine frequenzabhängige Bodensteifigkeit für die Erschütterungsprognose. Für die Wellenausbreitung in der Tiefe statt an der Bodenoberfläche müssen eigene Gesetzmäßigkeiten gefunden werden. Es werden die Punktlastlösungen im Frequenz-Wellenzahlbereich und durch Integration über die Wellenzahlen berechnet. Man erhält die Wellenfelder, die Terzspektren für verschiedene Entfernungen und Frequenzen. Es wird die Tiefenlage und das Bodenmodell (homogen, geschichtet und kontinuierlich zunehmende Steifigkeit) variiert. Die Rayleigh-Welle verliert ihre Bedeutung und stattdessen kann die Vollraumlösung zur Interpretation und Prognose verwendet werden. Es werden die Halbraumlösung mit und ohne Rayleigh-Welle und die Vollraumlösung in der Tiefe diskutiert und verglichen. Neben der Wellenausbreitung (der Transmission) werden auch Effekte der Erschütterungsanregung (der Emission) und der Übertragung in Gebäude (der Immission) mit Hilfe der Finite-Element-Randelement-Methode berechnet. Die Verteilung der dynamischen Achslast durch die Tunnelsohle ergibt eine Minderung gegenüber der Punktlastanregung. Bei der Immission hat man keine Freifeldanregung wie an der Bodenoberfläche. Man muss entweder neben der Wellenamplitude (Verschiebung oder Schwinggeschwindigkeit) in der Tiefe auch die Spannung der ankommenden Welle berücksichtigen, oder man muss die Freifeldamplituden nach Bodenaushub berechnen. Die Rechenergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass man als Freifeldanregung die zweifache Vollraumlösung ansetzen kann.
Measurements at the foundation, the surrounding soil and nearby buildings have been done during several drop tests of different containers on different foundations. The first measurements have been done on a big foundation where it should be guaranteed that the foundation is rigid and the container is tested properly. It was controlled that the foundation does not absorb more than 2 percent of the energy of the container. Most of the drop energy is lost in shock absorbers. Later on, a smaller drop test facility has been built on the ground but inside an existing building. It had to be controlled by prediction and measurements that the drop test will not damage the building. Tests from different heights on soft, medium, and stiff targets have been done to find out rules which allow to identify acceptable and unacceptable drop tests. Later on, the biggest drop test facility has been built for masses up to 200 t. It was necessary for the design of the foundation to estimate the forces which occur during the drop tests. On the other hand, the acceptable tests should be selected and controlled by measurements where the impact duration is important. Different sensors, accelerometers, accelerometers with mechanical filters, geophones (velocity transducers), strain gauges, and pressure cells have been applied for these tasks. The signals have been transformed to displacements which proved to be best suited for the interpretation of the impact mechanism. Modell calculations have been used to check and understand the dynamic measurements. The simplest law is the conservation of the momentum which is a good approximation if the impact is short. If the soil under the foundation has an influence on the deceleration of the container, the maximum foundation velocity is lower than the simple estimation. The amplitudes of the foundation could also be estimated from the ground vibrations and their amplitude-distance law.