Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2017 (3) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (1)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (1)
- Vortrag (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (3)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (3) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Creep-fatigue (1)
- ISO 6892-1 (1)
- Low cycle fatigue (1)
- Material (1)
- Power plants (1)
- Steam oxidation (1)
- TENSTAND WP4 Report (1)
- Thermo-mechanical fatigue (1)
- Tnsile testing (1)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (1)
The use of miniaturized specimen geometries in mechanical testing allows extracting the sample material directly from critical components of power plants like e.g. headers and pipes. In this way, both the impacts of the manufacture of the component (including all shaping and tempering influences) and of the complex aging/loading/oxidation conditions during Service can be analyzed and representative mechanical properties are obtained. In the present study, example results of a comparative creep and creep rupture study on P91 tempered martensite ferritic Steel, involving Standard and miniature specimens that were all taken from one batch of material, are presented. Cylindrical creep specimens with a minimum gauge length diameter of 3 mm were used, representing the smallest recommended test geometry of ISO 204. The test results of miniature specimens exhibit all characteristic creep features of tempered martensite ferritic steels, and analysis of the stress and temperature dependence of creep results in values that correspond well to literature data for P91. However, direct comparison with large scale specimen data reveals small but systematic variations in minimum creep rates, elongations at fracture and times to rupture. In our contribution, these differences are discussed in the light of literature findings on specimen size influences in other heat resistant alloys. Size effects need to be considered for a correct interpretation of results from miniature specimen creep tests.
In recent years, the performance of heat resistant ferritic-martensitic steels under cyclic oxidation and cyclic mechanical loading has gained considerable attention. The growing contributions of renewable energy sources to electricity generation have triggered a shift from continuous (baseload) operation of conventional power plants towards cyclic or “flexible” operation, which is needed to stabilize the electric grids by balancing the highly variable renewable’s input.
Compared to the impressive amount of data on isothermal oxidation/corrosion and static
mechanical loading (creep) that was compiled over decades, only little and sometimes
contradictory information is so far available on the reaction of these alloys to cyclic
conditions. The latter may involve frequent transients or holds at intermediate temperatures, as well as shut-downs and start-ups with high temperature rates which result in cyclic mechanical loads (thermo-mechanical fatigue, TMF) and thermo-cyclic oxidation at variable temperature.
Our contribution will report on recent findings obtained within the framework of a junior
research group which investigates the oxidation and fatigue of the ferritic-martensitic grades P91, P92 and VM12 SHC under thermo-cyclic conditions. Cyclic oxidation tests are carried out in steam using different sample shapes (flat coupons, U-segments and rings taken from heat exchanger tubes). Special attention is paid to changes in the kinetics and the integrity and possible delamination/spalling of the oxide layers. Mechanical tests are carried out on material from real steam pipes with a focus on the softening behaviour and lifetime issues resulting from combined creep/TMF loadings. All experiments are carried out in the 300-620°C regime with temperature and load profiles that resemble typical loading scenarios in power plants and are complemented by detailed microstructural characterisation.
The authors, Li et al., of the paper entitled “Analysis on the Issues in ISO 6892-1 and TENSTAND WP4 Report Based on Data to Confirm Tests by 21 Laboratories” (J. Test. Eval.
DOI: 10.1520/JTE20150479 (online only)) have expressed views that the authors of this rebuttal believe to be based on fundamental misunderstandings and misinterpretations of the tensile testing standard ISO 6892-1:2009, ISO 6892-1:2016, and its former versions, thus leading to erroneous conclusions. This refutation is intended to clarify the understanding of ISO 6892-1 and to address the misunderstandings and the misinterpretations of the authors of the paper. The present standard ISO 6892-1:2016 has a long history dating back to the 1970s. At that time, the tensile testing procedure was standardized on the National and International scale in parallel. To understand the present standard, the knowledge of the history helps to understand the background of details of the testing procedure implemented today. The history of the tensile testing standard has been discussed extensively during the annual international standardization meeting of ISO committee TC 164 SC1 for the last few years, at which some of the authors of the Li et al. paper attended. The authors continue to disagree with facts that were agreed by the consortium of the European research project TENSTAND and by the present international experts involved in ISO TC 164 SC1. It appears that the principal objective of the authors regarding their present publication was to increase the testing speed during tensile testing. However, the international standardization community has previously declined similar proposals by some of the authors. Many Arguments presented by Li et al. were thus refuted. The conclusions of their paper are misleading and the international standardization community for tensile testing refused to revise the present standard, ISO 6892-1 (2016), according the authors’ proposals.