Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (5)
Referierte Publikation
- ja (5) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Gas dispersion (2)
- Modeling (2)
- Simulation (2)
- CFD (1)
- Dampfdruck (1)
- Evaporation (1)
- Gauss (1)
- Hazard assessment (1)
- Lache (1)
- Lagrange (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Hazardous substances with a boiling point close to ambient temperatures will evaporate at higher vapour pressures, so that the evaporation takes places in the smooth transition between the evaporation at boiling point and below boiling point, representing the transition between two different physical phenomena. Whilst the evaporation at boiling point is driven by the available heat flux, the evaporation below boiling point is driven by the concentration gradient between the pool surface and the ambient air. Available evaporation models usually focused on the correct description of the mass transfer coefficient for temperatures below boiling point. A formulation of the correct equation for the mass flow is rarely documented. Whilst the mass transfer coefficient formulation is more or less equivalent in most models, the main difference occurs in the formulation of the mass flow equation. In Fact two types of models can be identified: the models with a linear pressure term and the models with a logarithmic pressure term. Whilst the logarithmic formulations result in an infinite mass flow near boiling point, which is not plausible, the linear formulations reach (different) finite values. Due to a lack of published experimental data it was not possible to determine whether the linear approach is conservative, under predicting or more or less accurate close to the boiling point. To evaluate the accuracy of each type of formulation, test series on liquid pools have been carried out at BAM for substances like Water, Ethanol, Cyclohexane, and Acetone. The tests were done under ambient conditions with a heatable, 90 cm diameter pool, so that the vapour pressures investigated ranged from 0 to close to 1 bar. The experimental data showed that neither of the linear nor the logarithmic formulation of the evaporation models is able to predict correctly the mass flow close to the boiling point. The logarithmic approach heavily over predicts the mass flow, while the linear approach is not conservative anymore when the vapour pressure exceeds 0.7 bar.
When handling flammable or toxic liquids or liquefied gases, the occurrence of a leakage and formation of a liquid pool is a scenario to be considered for risk assessment. Several models are available for the estimation of the evaporating mass flow, but only a very reduced number of experimental data is available for Validation purposes.
In the last years, the Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) in Berlin, Germany, carried out pool Evaporation experiments with different substances in basins with a Diameter ranging from 0,50 m to 1 m mainly on open air test sites with a built up (inner city) and a non-built-up (flat terrain) topography, but also in an enclosed space. The resulting experimental data sets cover a range of vapor pressures from 0,1 bar to 0,94 bar.
The aim of this work is to make the füll data set publicly available and to provide a description of the experimental boundary conditions.
Based on these data, a Validation of existing pool Evaporation models has been carried out and eventually led to a new formulation of an evaporation model, which is also presented here, covering the whole ränge from low wind speeds up to high vapor pressures.
In this work, results of numerical simulations and experimental investigations of the mass flow from evaporating liquid pools are presented. Numerical simulations are based on the boundary layer equations combined with an algebraic turbulence model. The experiments were carried out on open air test sites within flat and very rough topographies, at different temperatures with ethanol and cyclohexane as the evaporating liquids. An experimental investigation of the influence of the topography on the evaporation of a liquid pool is conducted. The results of the simulation are validated against experimental data from the open air experiments. Furthermore, a comparison of the simulation results with empirical prediction models has been made.
When handling flammable and/or toxic liquids or gases, the gas dispersion following a release of substance is a scenario to be considered in the risk assessment to determine the lower flammability distance (LFD) and toxicity thresholds. In this work a comparison of different gas dispersion tools of varying complexity ranging from a simple Gaussian model over a boundary layer model (BLM) and a Lagrangian model to CFD (in this case ANSYS CFX v14) is presented. The BLM covers the special case of liquid releases with formation of a pool. It does not only solve the gas dispersion but also calculates the evaporating mass flow out of the pool. The simulation values are compared to each other and to experimental data resulting mainly from our own open air experiments covering the near field and carried out on the Test Site Technical Safety of BAM (BAM-TTS) for different release types (pool evaporation, gas release) and topologies. Other validation data were taken from literature and cover large scale experiments in the range of several 100 m.