Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Abschirmung (1)
- Cement paste (1)
- EN 12254 (1)
- EN 207 (1)
- EN 208 (1)
- European standard (1)
- Interlaboratory test (1)
- Justierbrille (1)
- Laser safety (1)
- Laserschutz (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Wer mit Laserstrahlung zu tun hat, sollte vor allem auf den Schutz seiner Augen achten, denn die Netzhaut ist eines der empfindlichsten Gewebe des menschlichen Körpers. Auch die Hornhaut des Auges kann durch Laserstrahlung gefährdet sein. Sie hat eine Dicke von nur etwa 0,5 mm. Der Schutz der Augen vor Laserstrahlung ist durch verschiedene Maßnahmen möglich.
The European laser safety standards EN 207, EN 208, and EN 12254 each contain an annex B, which serves as a guidance for the selection of products. These annexes are informative only and are therefore not binding. As there are a variety of hazard scenarios, it is not recommended to change these annexes to a normative status, through which they would become mandatory. Instead, it is recommended to allow users to apply their own skills and know-how in selecting appropriate products, justifying where and why they deviate from the guidance in the standards. This paper explains the background on which the guidance for selection in the annexes of the standards is based and shows physically meaningful leeway.
This paper presents the results of an interlaboratory study of the rheological properties of cement paste and ultrasound gel as reference substance. The goal was to quantify the comparability and reproducibility of measurements of the Bingham parameters yield stress and plastic viscosity when measured on one specific paste composition and one particular ultrasound gel in different laboratories using different rheometers and measurement geometries.
The procedures for both in preparing the cement paste and carrying out the rheological measurements on cement paste and ultrasound gel were carefully defined for all of the study’s participants. Different conversion schemes for comparing the results obtained with the different measurement setups are presented here and critically discussed. The procedure proposed in this paper ensured a reasonable comparability of the results with a coefficient of variation for the yield stress of 27% and for the plastic viscosity of 24%, despite the individual measurement series’ having been performed in different labs with different rheometers and measurement geometries.