Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Korrosion (4)
- Nichtrostender Stahl (4)
- Duplex stainless steels (3)
- Passive layer (3)
- Pitting corrosion (3)
- Stress corrosion cracking (3)
- Surface condition (3)
- Austenitic stainless steels (2)
- Beständigkeit (2)
- Duplex (2)
Die Rohstoffpreise sind seit einigen Jahren starken Schwankungen unterworfen und weisen insgesamt eine steigende Tendenz auf. Dies kommt gerade bei den weit ver-breiteten Standardausteniten durch äußerst volatile Legierungszuschläge zum Ausdruck, für die in erster Linie das Legierungselement Nickel (Ni) entscheidend ist. Die-ser Umstand führt bei immer mehr Verarbeitern von Edelstahl Rostfrei in Deutschland zur Suche nach alternativen Edelstahlgüten, um die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit auch zukünftig sicherzustellen.
Rising Prices of nickel and molybdenum in the past few years have led to unprecedented interest in Substitution of leaner-content alloys for Standard 300-series austenitic stainless steels in a lot of applications. Due to the high prices of different alloying elements and to periodic large fluctuations that cause similar large fluctuations in the costs of using 300-series stainless steels; a lot of new materials entered the markets in Europe and also in the rest of the world. A big disadvantage consists in the fact that there are though corrosion results that, however, a direct comparison of the corrosion resistance of these new materials does not exist up to now or only incompletely. In this project comparative investigations were carried out and always one or several representatives of a material group were incorporated. These material groups are: Lean Duplex Stainless Steels, Manganese Alloyed Austenitic and Duplex Stainless Steels and Ferritic Stainless Steels. These materials were investigated in a lot of different test procedures and in different conditions focused on the application in civil engineering and common use. Beside the electrochemical investigations all materials were exposed in different surface States in the atmosphere, once in Coastal nearness and once in a city centre area. Other exposition tests with material Coupons where done in the atmosphere of indoor swimming pools and at the case of food processing machines were corrosion processes are caused by the cleaning procedure. First results are reported.
In einer umfangreichen Untersuchung konnte gezeigt werden, dass es aus korrosionstechnischer Sicht sehr gute, schwächer
legierte Alternativwerkstoffe zu den heute überwiegend eingesetzten nichtrostenden CrNi- und CrNiMo-Stählen gibt
und dass sich hierdurch ein wirtschaftlicher Vorteil generieren lässt.
Durch systematische Labor- und Auslagerungsuntersuchungen ist es möglich, sieben unterschiedliche nichtrostende Stahllegierungen hinsichtlich verschiedenster Anwendungen untereinander und auch in Bezug auf zwei austenitische Standardwerkstoffe (1.4301, 1.4404) zu vergleichen. Die parallele Untersuchung von fünf verschiedenen Oberflächenausführungen der jeweiligen Werkstoffe ermöglicht zudem, branchenspezifische Besonderheiten der Oberflächenausführung beim Werkstoffvergleich zu berücksichtigen. Der Einfluss der Oberflächenausführung wird überwiegend bei den Ergebnissen der Auslagerungsversuche in kritischen Atmosphären sichtbar, weniger bei den elektrochemischen Untersuchungen.
Die drei Vertreter aus dem Bereich der Duplexstähle zeigten unter den meisten Untersuchungsbedingungen eine hervorragende Korrosionsbeständigkeit. Insbesondere für Anwendungen im Bauwesen können die Lean-Duplexstähle deutliche Vorteile bieten. Der Manganaustenit 1.4376 sowie der Ferrit 1.4509 sind nur eingeschränkt als Alternativen geeignet, da die Werkstoffe bei einigen Versuchen signifikante Schwächen zeigten.---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The systematic laboratory and field exposure tests allow to compare seven different stainless steels among each other and also regarding two standard austenitic materials (1.4301, 1.4401) with respect to various applications. Parallel investigations with five different surface finishes of the respective materials enable to consider also industry-specific features of the surface finish. The influence of the surface finish can mainly be seen in the results of the exposure tests in critical atmospheres and less in the electrochemical investigations.
The three duplex stainless steels showed under most of the test conditions excellent corrosion resistance. Especially for applications in civil engineering the lean duplex steels offer clear advantages. The manganese alloyed 1.4376 and the ferritic steel 1.4509 are only limited suitable as alternatives as these materials showed significant weaknesses in some of the tests.
The second part of this paper looks continues the comparative investigation of lean duplex stainless steels, manganese alloyed austenitic and duplex stainless steels and ferritic stainless steels. These new materials were investigated in many different test procedures and in different conditions focused on the application in civil engineering and common use. In addition to electrochemical investigations, all materials were exposed to atmospheric conditions in different surface states. In Part 2, Prof. Gümpel and his team examine the effects of coastal and urban atmospheres on the samples, and presents their final conclusions.
Rising prices of nickel and molybdenum in the recent past years have led to unprecedented interest in substituting leaner-content alloys for standard 300-series austenitic stainless steels in many applications. Due to the price volatility of various alloying elements, many new materials have entered the market, yet no direct comparison of corrosion resistance of these new materials exists. In this project, comparative investigations were carried out and in each case one or several representatives of a material group were taken into account. The material groups covered were: lean duplex stainless steels, manganese alloyed austenitic and duplex stainless steels and ferritic stainless steels. In addition to electrochemical investigations, all materials were exposed to various atmospheric conditions in different surface states.
Systematic laboratory and field exposure tests allow to compare nine different stainless steels (three ferritic, three austenitic, and three duplex grades) for civil engineering applications. The influence of surface finish was also taken into account by choosing five different industry-specific features. The three duplex stainless steels revealed excellent corrosion resistance under most of the test conditions. Especially for applications in civil engineering the lean duplex steels offer distinct advantages. The manganese-alloyed 1.4376 and the ferritic steel 1.4509 cannot be recommended as alternative materials as they did not perform satisfactorily.