Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (25) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Explosionsschutz (5)
- Hybrid mixtures (4)
- 20L-sphere (3)
- Behälterversagen (3)
- Explosion limits (3)
- Explosionsgrenzen (3)
- CAFTP (2)
- Consequences (2)
- Explosion (2)
- Explosion protection (2)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 2 Prozess- und Anlagensicherheit (15)
- 2.1 Sicherheit von Energieträgern (15)
- 2.2 Prozesssimulation (2)
- 3 Gefahrgutumschließungen; Energiespeicher (2)
- 3.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (2)
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (2)
- 7.5 Technische Eigenschaften von Polymerwerkstoffen (2)
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (2)
- 8.1 Sensorik, mess- und prüftechnische Verfahren (2)
Paper des Monats
- ja (1)
Für die sicherheitstechnische Beurteilung von Sterilisationsprozessen wurden die Explosionsgrenzen von Gasgemischen aus Ethylenoxid, Inertgas und Luft experimentell bestimmt. Die Messungen sind mit Stickstoff, Kohlenstoffdioxid und Wasserdampf bei 20 und 100 °C sowie bei 0,4 und 1,0 bar durchgeführt worden. Mit Hilfe der Daten wurde ein halbempirisches Modell entwickelt, mit dem die Explosionsfähigkeit von Prozessgasgemischen berechnet werden kann.
Es wurde ein Verfahren zur Berechnung von Explosionsgrenzen ethylenoxidhaltiger Gasphasen in Sterilisatoren entwickelt. Mit Hilfe der Software GasEq® und des neu entwickelten Makros SterEx für MS-Excel® lassen sich die Explosionsgrenzen für Gemische aus Ethylenoxid, Luft und Inertgasen bei Temperaturen zwischen 20°C und 100°C sowie 0,4 bar und 1,0 bar berechnen. Somit ist es schnell möglich, sichere Betriebsbedingungen für Sterilisationsprozesse mit Ethylenoxid festzulegen. Das halbempirische Modell basiert auf der Annahme konstanter Flammentemperaturprofile an den Explosionsgrenzen in Abhängigkeit der EO-Konzentration für verschiedene Gemische. Durch systematische Zündversuche wurden Explosionsgrenzen für Gemische aus Ethylenoxid, Stickstoff, Kohlenstoffdioxid, Wasserdampf und Luft zur Bestimmung von Modellparametern und zur Validierung des Verfahrens bestimmt. Um die Prozessbedingungen in Sterilisatoren möglichst genau zu simulieren, wurden die Versuche in einem geschlossenen Autoklav in Anlehnung an DIN EN 1839-B durchgeführt. Berechnungen der Explosionsgrenzen von Prozessgasgemischen mit SterEx ergeben eine gute Übereinstimmung mit experimentell ermittelten Werten.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A calculation method for flammability limits of gas phases with ethylene oxide in sterilisers was developed. Using the Software GasEq® and the newly developed Makro SterEx for MS-Excel®, flammability limits of mixtures with ethylene oxide, air and inert gases at temperatures between 20°C and 100°C and pressures between 0.4 bar and 1.0 bar can be calculated. This method can be used to easily determine safe operating conditions. The used semi-empirical model is based upon the assumption of constant flame temperature profiles at the flammability limits subject to the EO-concentration for different mixtures. To collect model parameters and to validate the model, several experiments with mixtures of ethylene oxide, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, water vapour and air were carried out to determine flammability limits. To simulate the structural conditions of sterilisers, the experiments were conducted in accordance to DIN EN 1839-B in a closed autoclave with temperatures and pressures relevant for sterilisation processes. The calculation of flammability limits of process gas mixtures with SterEx provides good agreement with flammability limits that were determined in experiments.
There is no applicable existing standard for the determination of safety characteristics for hybrid mixtures. While developing a new standard in a joint research project in Germany first results from parameter studies led to a standard procedure that can be adopted by laboratories that are already testing dusts in the so called 20L-sphere with as little additional effort as necessary. In fact, one of the main objectives of this research project was to keep modifications and adjustments from the generally accepted dust testing procedures as easy and minimal as possible so as to limit potential deviations from one laboratory to another.
In this first round robin test on hybrid mixtures ever, with methane as gas component and a specific corn starch as dust sample, the practicality of the whole procedure, the scattering of the results and the deviation between the testing apparatuses is investigated. This paper summarizes the experimental procedure adopted and objectives of the first round-robin phase involving three of the four original German companies, plus volunteering laboratories from Australia, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Poland and P.R. China. The results will have an impact on the new standard and may lead to robust data for later simulation purposes.
Influence of pre-ignition pressure rise on safety characteristics of dusts and hybrid mixtures
(2021)
For the determination of the safety characteristics of dusts it is necessary to disperse the dust in the oxidating atmosphere (usually air). In the standard procedures for dusts this is realized by a partially evacuated explosion vessel (20L-sphere) in which the dust gets injected from a dust chamber pressurized with air. Shortly after that injection (60 ms) the dust cloud gets ignited under turbulent conditions, that are otherwise seen as almost ambient with 20 ◦C and about 1 bar (abs). While there has been a lot of research about the influence of the ignition delay time and the level of turbulence in the recent years little attention was paid to the pre–ignition pressure rise and the allowed variations in the standards. In the following work we showed that the allowed ranges for the pressures in the different dust standards influence the safety characteristics of dust alone severely.
Even though hybrid mixtures are an emerging risk problem in an interconnected industry there is no standard for the determination of their safety characteristics. In this work it is shown that especially for the preparation of hybrid mixtures of flammable dust and gas the pressures after injection of the dust and the mixing procedure have a large influence on the composition of the tested mixtures and therefore on the safety characteristics.
Considering both effects, wrong concentration of gas and wrong initial pressure, the discrepancy of safety characteristics from different facilities will be too big to applicable. The methods to overcome these weaknesses are also presented.
For the determination of safety characteristics of gases, vapors and dusts different types of ignition sources are used in international standards and guidelines. The paper presents test results of a comparative calorimetric and visual study between four different types of ignition sources. The ignition procedures were analyzed visually with a high-speed camera and electric recordings. In addition to that, the influence of the electrode-orientation, -distance as well as ignition energy on the reproducibility of the exploding wire igniter was tested.
The exploding wire is already in use for standardized determination of safety characteristics of gases, first tests on the suitability of the exploding wire igniter for dust testing have been carried out but are not standardized yet. Using the exploding wire, the ignition energy can be varied from 2 J to 10 000 J (2 x 5000 J) and thus it could be used for gases, vapors, dusts and hybrid mixtures. Moreover it can be used at high initial pressures and it is the only ignition source with an easily measurable ignition energy release. Furthermore, it does not introduce another chemical reaction into the system.
Finally, a proposal for a standard ignition source for explosion tests on hybrid mixtures is derived from the test results.
In this study, experimental determination and modelling investigations for the explosion regions of 1,3-dioxolane/inert gas/N2O and 1,3-dioxolane/inert gas/air mixtures were carried out and compared. The experimental measurements were carried out at 338 K and atmospheric pressure according to EN1839 method T using the inert gases N2, CO2, He and Ar. The results showed that the ratio of the lower explosion limit in N2O (LELN2O) to the lower explosion limit in air (LELair) is 0.52 and the ratio of the maximum oxygen content in air (MOCair) to the limiting oxidizer fraction in nitrous oxide (LOFN2O) is 0.36 ± 0.02 independent of the inert gas. When comparing the inert gas amount at the apex based on the pure oxidizing component, which is O2 in case of air, N2O-containing mixtures need less inert gas to reach the limiting oxidizer quantity whereas the efficiency of inert gases is in the same order. The coefficients of nitrogen equivalency however were found to differ to some extent. The explosion regions of 1,3-dioxolane/inert gas/oxidizer mixtures were modelled using the calculated adiabatic flame temperature profile (CAFTP) method as well as corrected adiabatic flame temperatures. The results indicate good agreement with experimental data for CO2, N2 and Ar- containing mixtures. The noticeable deviations that occur when He is the inert gas are due to the lacking transport data of that mixture.
While developing a standard for the determination of safety characteristics for hybrid mixtures the authors discovered, that, beside the ignition source, the mixing procedure is the main difference between the single-phase standards for dusts and gases. The preparation of hybrid mixtures containing a flammable gas and a flammable dust in the 20 L-sphere can be realized in different ways. Either the flammable gas is filled only in the sphere or only in the dust container or in both. In previous works, almost always the first method is applied, without giving any information on the accuracy of the gas mixtures. In this work the accuracy of the gas mixtures and the results of the tests applying two methods of mixing were studied. No significant influence of the mixing method itself on the safety characteristics explosion pressure pex and the normalized rate of pressure rise (K-value) was found. Obviously, homogenization of the gas mixtures can be obtained sufficiently by the turbulence that is caused during the injection from the dust container into the explosion chamber within a short time. However, the mixing procedure has a great influence on the accuracy of the gas amount of the mixtures obtained. Without modifying the 20 L-sphere by installing precise pressure sensors, assuring its tightness and performing gas analysis, it must be expected, that the accuracy of the gas mixtures is very low. This has a significant influence on the measured safety characteristics and may lead to unsafe facilities or unnecessary expensive safety measures.
Bei der Power-to-Gas-Technologie wird überschüssiger Strom aus erneuerbaren Energien durch Elektrolyse von Wasser in Wasserstoff umgewandelt. Dieser Wasserstoff kann als „chemischer Energiespeicher“ dienen und rückverstromt werden oder aber in das Erdgasnetz eingespeist wer-den. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit sind die Auswirkungen von Wasserstoffzusätzen zum Erdgas im Hin-blick auf den Explosionsschutz untersucht und die sicherheitstechnischen Kenngrößen für Erdgas-Wasserstoff-Gemische bestimmt worden. Von besonderem Interesse waren diejenigen Kenngrößen, die für reines Methan (Erdgas) und Wasserstoff deutliche Unterschiede aufweisen. Anders als bei vielen Literaturquellen, sollten im Rahmen dieser Arbeit die im Bereich der ATEX geltenden, harmo-nisierten Normen zur Bestimmung der Kenngrößen angewendet werden.
Die Untersuchungen ergaben, dass bei einem Zusatz von bis zu 10 Mol-% Wasserstoff keine der un-tersuchten Kenngrößen relevant beeinflusst wird. Die Gemische haben nur geringfügig erweiterte Explosionsbereiche und bleiben, wie die reinen Erdgase, in der Explosionsgruppe IIA. Auch die ma-ximalen Explosionsdrücke und die maximalen zeitlichen Druckanstiege bei Gasexplosionen werden nur wenig beeinflusst. Vergleichende Berechnungen zur Festlegung von explosionsgefährdeten Be-reichen (Ex-Zonen) auf Basis von Gasausbreitungsberechnungen ergaben ebenfalls nur geringfüge Unterschiede zum reinen Erdgas. Der Einsatz von Gaswarngeräten, die für Erdgas kalibriert wurden, ist für Erdgas-Wasserstoff-Gemische grundsätzlich möglich, erfordert aber eine gesonderte Sicher-heitsbewertung und ggf. eine Nachjustierung.
Safety characteristics for explosion protection of natural gas/hydrogen mixtures relevant in connection with the Power2Gas technology were studied in this work. Lower explosion limits (LEL) and upper explosion limits (UEL), limiting oxygen concentrations (LOC), maximum experimental safety gaps (MESG), maximum explosion pressures (pmax) and maximum rates of pressure rise (dp/dt)max were determined experimentally in dependence of the hydrogen fraction. Adding hydrogen did mainly effect the UEL, LOC, MESG and (dp/dt)max. The mixtures become more "critical" concerning the explosion hazards with increasing hydrogen fraction. However, the dependency of the safety characteristics from the hydrogen fraction is mainly not linear. Adding up to 10% hydrogen to natural gas had nearly no effect on the safety characteristics. More significant effects on the safety characteristics were observed at hydrogen fractions of more than 25%. For example the explosion group changes from IIA to IIB. Considering the huge explosion region and very high (dp/dt)max of hydrogen compared to natural gas, even adding 50% hydrogen to natural gas has a rather small effect on these characteristics. Furthermore pmax of hydrogen/natural-gas mixtures can be calculated with good accuracy assuming ideal adiabatic conditions. EL and LOC of natural gas/hydrogen mixtures in ternary systems with inert gas and air were calculated in dependence of the type of inert gas with the so called “model of constant adiabatic flame temperature profiles”.
In Gasphasen aus Ethylenoxid (EO) und Propylenoxid (PO), die bei technischen Alkoxylierungsreaktionen vorkommen, können auch ohne den Zutritt von Luft Zerfallsreaktionen stattfinden, die explosionsartig mit einer vielfachen Temperatur- und Drucksteigerung verlaufen. Zur Abschätzung der Auswirkungen solcher Explosionen wurden die Explosionsdrücke und die zeitlichen Druckanstiege von reinem EO und EO/PO-Gemischen bei Temperaturen von 100°C bis 200°C und Drücken von 1 - 10 bar in einem 3-dm³-Behälter und punktuell in einem 100-dm³-Behälter experimentell bestimmt.