Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (9)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (4)
- Posterpräsentation (3)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (2)
Schlagworte
- Blast (6)
- Numerical simulations (3)
- Acceleration sensors (2)
- Blast tests (2)
- Fiber optic sensing (2)
- RC-slabs (2)
- Reinforced concrete (2)
- Scaling (2)
- Similarity and scaling (2)
- Skalierung (2)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 2 Prozess- und Anlagensicherheit (15)
- 2.4 Prüfung und Bewertung von Explosivstoffen/Pyrotechnik (15)
- 2.5 Konformitätsbewertung Explosivstoffe/Pyrotechnik (15)
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (14)
- 7.4 Baustofftechnologie (13)
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (13)
- 8.6 Faseroptische Sensorik (13)
- 7.2 Ingenieurbau (9)
- 8.2 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfmethoden für das Bauwesen (4)
- 8.1 Sensorik, mess- und prüftechnische Verfahren (3)
Paper des Monats
- ja (1)
Sprengversuche sind erforderlich, um Explosionsereignisse auf Grund von Unfällen oder Anschlägen zu untersuchen und um das Schutzniveau für Menschen und Anlagen in kritischen Infrastrukturen zu bewerten. Die Durchführung von Feldversuchen in großem Maßstab für komplexe Szenarien ist sehr ressourcenintensiv. Verlässliche Experimente im kleinen Maßstab sind eine vielversprechende Alternative. Die Skalierungsgesetze für die Bemessung von Stahlbetonkonstruktionen unter Explosionsbelastung sind jedoch nicht hinreichend etabliert.
Die Forschungsarbeit fokussiert sich auf Stahlbetonstrukturen, die für die Standardisierung von skalierten Sprengversuchen in Frage kommen. Im Rahmen der Machbarkeitsstudie wurden auf dem TTS-Gelände Sprengversuche an Probekörpern unterschiedlicher Größe durchgeführt. Dabei wurden verschiedene horizontal gelagerte Stahlbetonplatten getestet und unterschiedlichen Explosionsbelastungen ausgesetzt. Die Sprengversuche umfassten verschiedene Messtechniken zur Quantifizierung der Explosionslast sowie des Verhaltens der Stahlbetonplatten. Die Explosionslast wurde mit bündig eingebauten piezoelektrischen Druckmessern gemessen, während Beschleunigungssensoren und flächig applizierte verteilte faseroptische Sensorik verwendet wurden, um das dynamische Verhalten der Platte unter Explosionsbelastung zu charakterisieren. Darüber hinaus wurden Schädigungsmerkmale ebenfalls mit verteilter faseroptischer Sensorik ermittelt. Die Anwendung solcher Messtechniken sowie die Nutzung verschiedener numerischer Softwaretools bieten die Möglichkeit die Skalierungsgesetze zu verifizieren bzw. anzupassen.
Blast tests are required to investigate accidental or intentional blast events and to assess the level of protection for people and facilities in critical infrastructures. Conducting large-scale field tests for complex scenarios is very resource intensive. Reliable small-scale experiments are a promising alternative. However, the scaling laws for the design of reinforced concrete structures under blast loads are not sufficiently established.
In our research work, a consortium made up of three BAM departments, focuses on reinforced concrete structures that are suitable for the standardization of scaled blast tests. As part of the feasibility study, blast tests were carried out on test specimens of different sizes on the BAM Test Site for Technical Safety (TTS). Various reinforced concrete plates were tested and subjected to different blast loads. The blast tests included various measurement techniques to quantify the blast load and the behavior of the reinforced concrete plate. The blast load was measured with flush-mounted piezoelectric pressure gauges, while accelerometers and embedded fiber optic sensor cables were used to characterize the dynamic behavior of the plate under blast loading. In addition, damage characteristics were also determined using distributed fiber optic sensing. The application of these measurement techniques as well as the use of different numerical software tools offer the possibility to verify or adapt the scaling laws.
Blast testing is undoubtedly the most straightforward and direct method of evaluating the blast resistance of a structure. For the calibration and validation of numerical models as well, blast tests must be carried out. However, true-scale prototype testing under different blast loading scenarios is not always feasible. Reliable small-scale experiments are a promising alternative. Application of dimensional analysis and similarity principals can be found in different engineering fields. For applications to the phenomenon of shock wave propagation, Hopkinson-Cranz or cube-root scaling is a well-established concept. When it comes to the scaling the structural response, research has predominantly focused on structures made of metallic materials. Scaled investigations with concrete or reinforced concrete (RC) structures remain limited, specifically under blast loading.
In a preliminary study, we tested RC slabs at two different scales under near-field blast loading. Replica scaling, which is geometrical scaling while using the same materials at different scales, was implemented in the construction of the test specimens. The assessment of scaling and the discrepancy in its application was investigated by characterizing the blast loads, dynamic response, and damage. The experiments were supplemented by numerical simulations of these scenarios. The quantification of scenario-and-response-specific discrepancy can be used to modify the scaling laws, so that a blast assessment can be performed based on resource efficient small-scale tests.
Protection against terrorist or accidental scenarios in industrial settings requires suitable designs of structures to resist blast loads. Field testing as well as finite element simulations are among the techniques available to engineers in the understanding of the structural behavior against blast loading. As blast testing of complex scenarios can be very resource intensive, tests are generally performed for simplified scenarios. Numerical tools can be used to model these scenarios in order to get a better insight into blast loading, structural response and the resulting damage to the structure. In the next steps, the simplified scenario is successively modified in numerical simulations to incorporate complexities that cannot be covered in blast testing experiments. One of the conditions for this approach to work is that the original simplified numerical simulation is valid. The scopes and challenges encountered in such a validation are the focus of this presentation. A relatively ‘simple’ field test of a horizontal reinforced concrete (RC) slab subjected to blast loading is taken as an example for validation of the performance of numerical tools. The blast test incorporated various measurement techniques to quantify the blast load as well as the behavior of the RC slab. Blast load was measured using flush-mounted piezoelectric pressure gauges, whereas acceleration sensors and fiber-optic sensor cables were used to characterize the dynamic behavior of the slab under blast loading. Additionally, damage characteristics were ascertained also using fiber-optic sensing. The application of such measurement techniques, along with different numerical software available for the analysis of the scenario in question,
demonstrate the scope of our contribution.
At the BAM test range in Horstwalde a number of field trials were conducted with a HE to investigate the free field propagation of shock waves and that resulting from reflection at structure surfaces. In addition, the behavior of the structure under the effect of the dynamic pressure waves after explosion was studied. For both the tests, (a) with a 30 cm thick reinforced-concrete wall and (b) in free field, pressure was measured over the entire test duration with piezoelectric sensors at distances of 5, 10 and 15 m from the detonation center for a range of HE quantities. Apart from this, high speed footage of the tests was recorded as well.
Corresponding to the field tests, numerical simulations of HE detonation were performed using APOLLO BLASTSIMULATOR, a CFD tool developed by Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics, Ernst-Mach-Institute. The accuracy of the simulation results as well as the computing times depend on the spatial grid resolution. The outputs of grid-independence study demonstrated that the peak pressure is higher and the pressure-rise is steeper for simulation runs with a finer grid. Remarkably however, the exponential pressure decline is independent of the grid resolution. Advantage was taken of this feature to obtain improved peak pressure values from comparatively coarser grids, in that curve-fitting was performed using the Friedlander Equation, which is well documented in literature.
The simulation results for pressure-time histories were compared with the field-test results at the corresponding measurement positions. The two data sets showed good correlation in case of scaled distances greater than 5 [m/kg1/3] for both peak pressure and impulse values. This conclusion could be drawn for both trial-types: free-field and with reflection wall. The near field region, on the other hand, necessitates further investigation for the validation of numerical simulation.
A safety or security related assessment of explosions, accidental and intentional scenarios alike, often necessitate performance of replication-tests. Such test results are necessary to clarify the causes within the scope of forensic investigations. To gain important insights into the behavior of structures and materials under such loading, field tests may also be performed in accordance with different test standards. To determine the resistance of building-structures after explosions, estimation of the residual load-bearing capacity in addition to the assessment of dynamic structural response and damage to the building components is important. In most cases an evaluation of structural integrity is based only on the visual damage, resulting in an overestimation of the residual capacity.
The Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) operates the Test site for Technical Safety (TTS) on an area measuring about 12 km2 in the Federal State of Brandenburg for execution of true-to-scale explosion tests. At the TTS, building component testing was performed to assess the suitability of different non-destructive testing methods to characterize the dynamic structural response and damage resulting from the detonation of high explosives.
Different blast-loading scenarios were realized by varying the net explosive mass and the standoff distance with all scenarios representing a near-field detonation. The test object was a reinforced concrete wall 2 m high, 2.5 m wide and 20 cm thick, fixed at both vertical edges. The dynamic loading of the wall was characterized with 8 piezoelectric pressure sensors flush-mounted on the front surface, thus measuring the reflected pressures from the shock wave. The tests were conducted with the aim of characterizing the global behavior of the wall under dynamic shock loading and the resulting local damage pattern, respectively. High speed digital image correlation was implemented in combination with multiple acceleration sensors to observe the rear surface of the wall to chart the dynamic deflection during the loading and to determine the residual deformation after the loading had ceased. In addition, one test specimen was instrumented with fiber optic sensor cables, both fixed to the rebars and embedded in the concrete-matrix, respectively. Firstly, these sensors were interrogated during the blast test by a distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) device using a particularly high sampling rate to measure the shock-induced vibrations in the structure with high temporal resolution. This delivers information on dynamics of compression and tension cycles from within the structure. Secondly, the local damage-pattern emerging during the series of blasts was determined via distributed fiber optic strain sensing (DSS) by interrogating the embedded fiber optic sensors with a high spatial resolution DSS device after each blast. This enabled the characterization of non-visual damage to the structure, in particular with regard to the formation of localized cracks in the concrete matrix. The DSS was further complimented by a structure-scanner based on ultrasonic measurements.
Our contribution describes this new test approach in detail. Results of the three datasets, namely dynamic shock loading, global behavior of the test object and the local damage pattern will be presented. The suitability of the implemented measurement methods will be discussed in combination with the challenges in their application for technical safety evaluation of building components under explosive loading.
An effective protection of structures against impact from detonation of high explosives (HE) necessitate certain design specifications to be met. In the event of an explosion, accidental or intentional, any damage in its neighborhood (especially, for example, to the structures of strategic importance) should remain as low as possible. The behavior of a structure under the shock loading from an explosion will determine the extent of the damage. The investigation of the relevant phenomena that occur during the event of an explosion is the objective of this study.
In accordance with the test parameters, numerical simulations were performed and results were compared with those from field tests. The deformation of the wall under shock impact was simulated by implementing the appropriate interaction of fluid and structure. Moreover, the numerical pressure-time histories in front of the wall were compared with the ones measured in the field by means of piezoelectric pressure gauges, providing a validation for the shock waves’ propagation.
Current capabilities for full-scale field blast testing are highly resource intensive. Reliable small-scale experiments are an effective alternative. Characterization of the dynamic response and damage of RC elements to scaled blast loads was investigated in scaled-down field experiments. Spatially resolved information on the dynamic structural response to blast loading was obtained using distributed fiber optic acoustic sensing (DAS), acceleration sensors as well as piezoelectric pressure sensors.
Blast tests are indispensable for investigations of accidental or intentional explosions and to evaluate the level of protection to people and equipment within critical infrastructure. Current capabilities for detailed blast effects assessment are limited to performing full-scale field testing, which, for complex scenarios, are highly resource intensive. In this regard, reliable numerical simulations are an effective alternative option. A discussion of the scope and challenges of using numerical tools for a technical-safety assessment of reinforced concrete structures under blast loading is presented. Different coupling possibilities between shock wave simulations and structural simulations with the help of practical examples is given. An outlook on the development of new methods for structural simulations currently being researched at BAM concludes the presentation.
Zur Bewertung der Widerstandsfähigkeit von Schutzobjekten und Bauteilen gegen Explosionsbeanspruchung führt die Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) regelmäßig Sprengversuche im Realmaßstab auf einem Testgelände durch.
Solche Versuche sind planungs- und ressourcenintensiv, sodass sie zunehmend durch numerische Simulationen ergänzt bzw. ersetzt werden.
Aktuelle Forschungsarbeiten zielen darauf ab, neue Berechnungsmethoden und Materialmodelle zu entwickeln, mit denen die Bestimmung der Bauteilantwort sowie die daraus resultierende Schädigung nach einem Explosionsereignis möglich sind.
Zur Validierung solcher Ansätze ist es notwendig, systematische Versuche mit unterschiedlichen Szenarien durchzuführen, bei denen die relevanten Parameter mit Hilfe verschiedener Messmethoden aufgezeichnet werden.
