Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (4)
Referierte Publikation
- ja (4)
Schlagworte
- Circular economy (3)
- Electric vehicle (2)
- Repurposing (2)
- Battery ageing (1)
- Battery energy storage system (1)
- Electric vehicles (1)
- Key performance indicators (1)
- Life cycle assessment (1)
- Lithium-Ion battery (1)
- Lithium-ion batteries (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Repurposing lithium-ion batteries has proven to be a promising solution to address the rising number of end-of-life batteries that can be used for second-life energy storage systems and thus extend their service life. While previous research has provided valuable insights into the environmental benefits of battery repurposing, there is still a need to examine the repurposing process more thoroughly, in order to make well-informed decisions on the implementation of second-life battery storage systems. Therefore, this study examines the influence of different repurposing strategies on the environmental performance of second-life battery energy storage systems. A life cycle assessment was conducted, analysing four repurposing cases relating to the exchange of components, namely
i) new battery management system and module casing (Base case),
ii) new battery management system and reuse of module casing (Case 1),
iii) new module casing and reuse of battery management system (Case 2) and
iv) reuse of module casing and battery management system (Case 3).
These impacts were compared to a storage system with new batteries, to determine the potential environmental benefits and identify the most suitable repurposing strategy. Our findings demonstrate significant environmental benefits of second-life battery energy storage systems across various impact categories and repurposing cases. The Base case and Case 1 resulted in environmental benefits across all impact categories. The highest benefits were observed for metal depletion with savings of 58 % and 61 %, respectively. Increased savings were obtained for Case 2 and Case 3. However, environmental drawbacks were identified for freshwater and marine ecotoxicity. In particular, Case 2 resulted in the highest drawbacks of -22 % and -16 %, respectively. These can be attributed to the allocation procedure, particularly affecting the recycling credits of battery management system recycling. The full allocation of end-of-life impacts and consequently the recycling credits to the second-life battery has not only led to a substantial increase in overall savings, but also resulted in impact categories that originally had disadvantages becoming those with the highest environmental savings. This study demonstrates the importance of carefully selecting repurposing strategies for second-life energy storage systems to maximize their environmental benefits and avoid drawbacks. Additionally, the results highlight the substantial influence of allocation procedures on overall environmental impacts, underscoring the need for clearer methodological guidance on addressing the multifunctionality of repurposed batteries.
With the rise of electric vehicles (EVs) and thus lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs), the number of end‐of‐life (EoL) LIBs after their first life in EVs is about to increase significantly. These end‐of‐first‐life (EoFL) EV LIBs still have sufficient energy density for less‐demanding second‐life applications like stationary battery energy storage systems (BESSs) or mobile applications (e.g., forklifts, tools). Repurposing EoFL EV LIBs extends their lifespan, offering sustainability benefits and supporting several United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, prevailing market entry barriers, such as high repurposing costs, little information on battery history and aging, or lacking performance indicators, hinder the widespread implementation of second‐life applications. Thus, this study aims to identify preconditions for considering and selecting useful EoFL LIBs and to determine key performance indicators (KPIs) to minimize economic risks for a successful second‐life market launch. KPIs were rated according to importance using a Likert scale, and reference values were introduced. A mixed‐methods approach, using expert interviews, an exploratory workshop, and an online survey, was applied. Twelve important preconditions were identified, with the “availability of information on battery specification” and “compliance with standards and regulations” considered very important. In addition, 12 KPIs were derived, covering six economic, three environmental, and three technical and safety‐related indicators. The KPIs “state of safety (SoS)” and “resource savings (Rsav)” were rated as highly important. Overall, the findings provide performance measurement guidance for repurposing companies, facilitating the market launch and adoption of second‐life applications. Future research can build on these results and investigate variations among different battery types, ultimately promoting a circular economy.
Transition to circular economy for lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles requires integrating multiple stages of the value cycle. However, strategies aimed at extending the lifetime of batteries are not yet sufficiently considered within the European battery industry, particularly regarding repurposing. Using second-life lithium-ion batteries (SLBs) before subsequent recycling can offer several advantages, such as the development of sustainable business models, the reduction of emissions, and alignment with UN Sustainable Development Goals 7, 12, and 13. Using expert and problem-centred interviews along with an exploratory workshop, this study guides stakeholders in the battery sector by illustrating the necessary changes for a more holistic circular economy. Moreover, an extended political, economic, social, technological, environmental, legal, and additionally safety-related (PESSTEL) analysis approach is carried out, which has not yet been used in this context. In this process, barriers, as well as necessary institutional framework conditions and organisational requirements for a successful market entry of SLB applications are investigated. Among others, key barriers relate to the competition with first-life applications and safety concerns. SLBs require high manual labour costs for repurposing, along with expenses for expired warranties and re-certifications. Ownership structures in traditional business models often result in SLBs and their corresponding usage data staying under the control of the manufacturers. Market viability, however, requires a level playing field for both first-life and second-life operators as well as circular battery and data-sharing business models. Gathering data on the ageing performance and performing improved safety testing according to test protocols facilitates the reliable assessment of SLBs.
The reuse of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) from electric vehicles (EVs) in second-life applications such as battery energy storage systems (BESSs) offers significant environmental and economic benefits. Beyond economic considerations, safety management is a key challenge for large-scale deployment, yet the influence of ageing on LIB safety remains insufficiently understood. Preger et al., emphasized in their review the existing gap on data about electrical abuse and high-capacity cells. This laboratory-scale study investigates the evolution of key safety parameters over battery lifetime. The present study contribute to closing this gap studying three types of LIB cells (Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) chemistry) from EV and hybrid EV batteries that were artificially aged and tested at three representative states of health (SOH): 100% (beginning-of-life, BOL), 80% (end of first life), and 60% (midpoint of second life). Cells were subjected to thermal abuse, overcharge, and accelerating rate calorimetry, with selected tests coupled to online gas analysis. Results show a pronounced ageing effect on thermal stability. The onset temperature of thermal runaway was reduced by 17–69 ◦C for aged cells (60% SOH) compared with BOL cells, while overcharge acceptance decreased by 13–78%. Although aged cells exhibited lower thermal stability, their thermal runaway reactions under inert conditions were less severe, as indicated by
lower maximum temperatures. These findings highlight the need to account for ageing-induced shifts in exothermic reaction onset and thermal runaway behavior when designing safe second-life BESS. Future work should extend the analysis to LFP chemistries especially as the market is expected to shift towards this chemistry and consider battery and system levels, including influence of ageing on thermal runaway propagation.
