Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (89)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (50)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (30)
- Posterpräsentation (8)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (5)
- Forschungsbericht (5)
- Buchkapitel (1)
- Dissertation (1)
- Sonstiges (1)
Schlagworte
- Tensile properties (15)
- BAM-Liste (14)
- Dangerous goods (14)
- Sealing materials (12)
- Biodiesel (11)
- Biofuels (11)
- Compatibility (11)
- BAM-List (9)
- Polyethylene grades (9)
- Shore hardness (9)
- Beständigkeit (7)
- Compatibility evaluations (7)
- Polyethylen (7)
- Corrosion resistance (6)
- Dichtungswerkstoffe (6)
- Korrosionsbeständigkeit (6)
- Polyethylenformstoffe (6)
- Beständigkeitsbewertung (5)
- Corrosion tests (5)
- Gefahrguttransport (5)
- Gefahrgutverpackungen (5)
- High-alloyed metallic tank materials (5)
- Spannungsrissbeständigkeit (5)
- Biokraftstoffe (4)
- Change in tensile properties (4)
- Dangerous goods packagings (4)
- Design type tests (4)
- E85 (4)
- Gefahrgüter (4)
- Heizöllagerbehälter (4)
- Tankcontainer (4)
- Tankfahrzeuge (4)
- Tankwerkstoffe (4)
- B10 (3)
- Baumusterprüfungen (3)
- Bioethanol (3)
- Dangerous goods packaging (3)
- Duplexstahl (3)
- Eisenbahnkesselwagen (3)
- FAME (3)
- FTIR (3)
- Gefahrgutverpackung (3)
- Heizöl (3)
- Lebensdauer (3)
- Mass loss (3)
- Material parameters (3)
- Metallene Werkstoffe (3)
- Monitoring (3)
- Nickel alloy (3)
- Polyethylene (3)
- Polyethylenterephthalat (3)
- Schadensursachen (3)
- Schädigungsgrad (3)
- Verpackungen (3)
- Acoustic emission (2)
- Aged biodiesel (2)
- Aged heating oil with 10% biodiesel (B10) (2)
- Beschleunigungssensoren (2)
- Beständigkeitsuntersuchungen (2)
- Change in MFR and tensile properties (2)
- Change in mass (2)
- Compatibility evaluation (2)
- Duplex steel (2)
- Duplexsteel (2)
- E10 (2)
- FTIR analysis (2)
- FTIR spectra (2)
- Faseroptische Sensorik (2)
- HDPE grades (2)
- Heating oil tanks (2)
- Korrosion (2)
- Korrosionsschäden (2)
- Korrosionsuntersuchungen (2)
- Laboratory method (2)
- Leckage (2)
- Materialschäden (2)
- Metallische Behälterwerkstoffe (2)
- Permeation barriers (2)
- Polyethylene terephthalate (2)
- Polymeric materials (2)
- Polymers (2)
- Polymerwerkstoffe (2)
- Resistance to oxidative degradation (2)
- Rohrleitung (2)
- Schallemission (2)
- Service life (2)
- Shore-Härte (2)
- Standardflüssigkeiten (2)
- Stapeldruckprüfung (2)
- Stress corrosion cracking (2)
- Stress cracking resistance (2)
- Superaustenitic steels (2)
- Tank materials (2)
- Transport (2)
- Zugeigenschaften (2)
- biofuels (2)
- compatibility (2)
- sealing materials (2)
- 1.4362 (1)
- Accelerometer (1)
- Accelerometers (1)
- Acid corrosion (1)
- Aged heating oil with 10% and 20% biodiesel (1)
- Ageing (1)
- Assimilierungsliste (1)
- Atmosphärische Korrosion (1)
- Austenitic CrNiMo steel (1)
- BAM-GGR 003 (1)
- BAM-list (1)
- Baumusterprüfung (1)
- Bauschäden (1)
- Bending tests on pipe segments (1)
- Beständigkeit gegen oxidativen Abbau (1)
- Beständigkeit in Biokraftstoffen (1)
- Beständigkeitsbewertungen (1)
- Bewertung der Korrosionsbeständigkeit (1)
- Biegefestigkeit (1)
- Biegesteifigkeit (1)
- Biobrennstoff (1)
- Biozide (1)
- Change in shore hardness (1)
- Chemische Verträglichkeit (1)
- Compression set (1)
- Continous monitoring (1)
- Corrosion (1)
- Corrosion test (1)
- Datenbank Gefahrgut (1)
- Degree of damage (1)
- Degree of degradation (1)
- Design-type tests (1)
- Diesel fuel (1)
- Distributed acoustic sensing (1)
- Doppelwandbehälter (1)
- Drop test (1)
- Drop tests (1)
- Druckkraft (1)
- Druckverformungsrestprüfung (1)
- Duplex steels (1)
- E10 (Kraftstoff mit bis zu 10% Ethanol) (1)
- Economic Losses (1)
- Eindringtiefen (1)
- Elastomer (1)
- Elastomere (1)
- Elastomers (1)
- Elektrische Fremdbeeinflussung (1)
- Environmental Pollution (1)
- FNCT (1)
- FTIR spectroscopy (1)
- Fiber optic sensing (1)
- Fibre optic acoustic sensing (1)
- Fibre optic sensing (1)
- Fluorkautschuk (FKM) (1)
- Formstoffkennwerte (1)
- Fuel with 10 % ethanol (1)
- Fuels (1)
- Full notch creep test (1)
- Gefahrguttanks (1)
- Gefahrstofflagerung (1)
- HDPE (1)
- HDPE-Formstoffe (1)
- Heating oil (1)
- Heating oil - biodiesel - blend (1)
- Heating oil storage tanks (1)
- Heating oil with 10 % FAME (1)
- Heating oil with 10 % biodiesel (1)
- Heating oil with 10% biodiesel (1)
- Heating oil with 20% biodiesel (1)
- Heating oil-Biodiesel-Blend (1)
- Heizöl mit 10% Biodiesel (1)
- Heizöl mit 20% Biodiesel (B20) (1)
- Heizöl-20% Biodiesel-Blend (1)
- Heizöl-FAME-Blends (1)
- High alloyed stainless steel (1)
- High-alloyed metallic tank (1)
- High-alloyed stainless steel (1)
- Hochlegierte Tankwandungswerkstoffe (1)
- Hydraulic pressure test (1)
- Höherlegierte Tankwerkstoffe (1)
- Höherlegierte Werkstoffe (1)
- Höherlegierte metallische Tankwerkstoffe (1)
- Höherlegierte metallische Werkstoffe (1)
- Korrosionstest (1)
- Korrosive Medien (1)
- Kraftstoffe mit biogenen Anteilen (1)
- Kraftstoffe mit und ohne biogene Anteile (1)
- Leak detection (1)
- Leakproofness test (1)
- Luftverunreinigung (1)
- Materialkennwerte (1)
- Melt Flow Rate (MFR) (1)
- Metallic materials (1)
- Metallische Tankwerkstoffe (1)
- Mischsäuren (1)
- Monitoring von Rohrleitungen (1)
- Nachweis der chemischen Verträglichkeit (1)
- Nachweisverfahren (1)
- Nickel-base alloy (1)
- Nickel-based alloy (1)
- Nickelbasislegierung (1)
- Nickellegierung (1)
- Nickellegierungen (1)
- Nitric acid (1)
- Notched impact strength at -30°C (1)
- Oxidativer Abbau (1)
- PE-HD (1)
- Packagings for the transport of dangerous goods (1)
- Pipeline monitoring (1)
- Pipelines (1)
- Polymer in fuels (1)
- Polymere (1)
- Polymere Behälterwerkstoffe (1)
- Polymere Dichtungs-, Beschichtungs- und Auskleidungswerkstoffe (1)
- Polymere Werkstoffe (1)
- Pre-storage with nitric acid (1)
- Premium grade fuels (1)
- Proof of compatibility (1)
- RME (1)
- Resistance (1)
- Resistance of polymers (1)
- Rohrbiegeprüfstand (1)
- Salpetersäure (1)
- Schadensursachen an Rohrleitungen (1)
- Schmelze-Masse-Fließrate (1)
- Schädigung (1)
- Shore Hardness (1)
- Sonderedelstähle (1)
- Stacking test (1)
- Stapeldruckprüfungen (1)
- Steel (1)
- Stoffbezogene Baumusterzulassung (1)
- Storage (1)
- Struktur- und fluidmechanische Schwingungen (1)
- Superaustenite (1)
- Tanks (1)
- Tankwerkstoff (1)
- Transport tanks (1)
- Transport tanks of dangerous goods (1)
- Transport und Lagerung von Chemikalien (1)
- Transporttankwerkstoffe (1)
- Verpackungen zum Transport von Gefahrgütern (1)
- Verpackungsmaterial (1)
- Versagensgrenzen (1)
- Verteilte Faseroptische Sensorik (1)
- Verträglichkeitsnachweis (1)
- Werkstoffbeständigkeit (1)
- Werkstoffkennwerte (1)
- X2CrNiN23-4 (1)
- Zeitstandbeanspruchung (1)
- dangerous goods packagings (1)
- polyethylene terephthalate (1)
- stress cracking resistance (1)
- test methods (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 3 Gefahrgutumschließungen; Energiespeicher (27)
- 3.2 Gefahrguttanks und Unfallmechanik (27)
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (9)
- 7.6 Korrosion und Korrosionsschutz (9)
- 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien (3)
- 1.4 Prozessanalytik (3)
- 2 Prozess- und Anlagensicherheit (3)
- 2.1 Sicherheit von Energieträgern (3)
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (3)
- 8.1 Sensorik, mess- und prüftechnische Verfahren (3)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (89)
Biofuels including ethanol and biodiesel (fatty acid methyl ester) represent an impor-tant renewable fuel alternative to petroleum-derived transport fuels. Increasing bio-fuel use would bring some benefits, such as a reduction in oil demands and green-house gas emissions, and an improvement in air quality.
Materials compatibility is a major concern whenever the fuel composition is changed in a fuel system.
The aim of this work is to study the interaction between sealing materials such as FKM (fluorocarbon rubber), EPDM (ethylene-propylene-diene rubber), CR (chloro-prene rubber), CSM (chlorosulfonated polyethylene), NBR (acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber), IIR (butyl rubber), VMQ (methyl-vinyl-silicone rubber) and FVMQ (methyl-fluoro-silicone rubber) and biofuels such as biodiesel, E85 (fuel with 85% ethanol) and B10 (heating oil with 10% biodiesel) at 70°C for 84 days. Experiments were con-ducted with tests specimens of theses elastomers to document the changes in the mass and tensile properties of these sealing materials according to ISO 1817.
The exposure tests of the elastomers in E85 at 70°C showed that the weight gain caused by swelling of the test specimens was in the range of 3% to 12%. However, the weight gain of the fluorinated elastomers was at the lower end of this range. Tensile strength and breaking elongation decreased by 22% to 61% or 13% to 77%. The lowest decrease in the tensile properties was determined for FKM, EPDM und IIR. These sealing materials were evaluated as resistant to E85 up to a temperature of 70°C.
Biodiesel absorbed water more quickly and aged faster than conventional diesel fuel. The weight loss of the elastomers varied between 9% (FKM) and 126% (CSM) in biodiesel. FKM was evaluated as resistant with a 16% reduction in tensile strength, a 2% reduction in breaking elongation and low weight loss. NBR, EPDM, CSM and VMQ were evaluated as not resistant. CSM even lost 84% of its original tensile strength and 78% of its breaking elongation.
The highest weight gain as a result of swelling was measured for CSM with 86%, for EPDM with 84% and for VMQ with 54% in B10, while the fluorine-containing elasto-mers FKM (1%) and FVMQ (3%) absorbed much less B10 and swelled less. FKM lost 23% in tensile strength and 17% in breaking elongation; FMVQ lost 29% in ten-sile strength and 36% in breaking elongation. FMVQ was, therefore, only limited in its resistance to B10.
The elastomers NBR, EPDM, CSM and VMQ were not resistant to B10 at all as the decrease in the tensile properties was significantly over 50%. NBR lost about 93% and CSM about 100% of its breaking elongation.
The conclusion of the investigations at 70°C is that FKM is the most resistant sealing material in biodiesel, E85 (fuel with 85% ethanol) and B10 (heating oil with 10% biodiesel).
Oxidative damage of an Intermediate Bulk Container (IBC) made of polyethylene by 53 % nitric acid
(2013)
Biofuels including ethanol and biodiesel (fatty acid methyl ester) represent an important renewable fuel alternative to petroleum-derived transport fuels. Increasing biofuel use would bring some benefits, such as a reduction in oil demands and greenhouse gas emissions, and an improvement in air quality.
Materials compatibility is a major concern whenever the fuel composition is changed in a fuel system. The question arises of whether sealing materials are resistant to fuels with bioethanol and biodiesel (rapeseed oil fatty acid methyl ester).
The aim of this work is to study the interaction between sealing materials such as FKM (fluorocarbon rubber), EPDM (ethylene-propylene-diene rubber), CR (chloroprene rubber), CSM (chlorosulfonated polyethylene), NBR (acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber), IIR (butyl rubber), VMQ (methyl-vinyl-silicone rubber), FVMQ (methyl-fluoro-silicone rubber) and PA (polyamide) and biofuels such as biodiesel (FAME, non-aged and 2 years aged), E85 (fuel with 85% ethanol) and B10 (heating oil with 10% biodiesel, non-aged and one year aged) compared with premium-grade fuel at 20°C, 40°C and 70°C for 84 days. Exposure experiments were conducted with specimens of these elastomers to document the changes in the mass and tensile properties of these sealing materials. Visual examination of some test specimens clearly showed a great volume increase until breakage or partial dissolution.
The sealing materials FVMQ, VMQ and PA were evaluated as resistant in E85 at 20°C and 40°C with a reduction of tensile properties limited to 15%. None of the examined materials was evaluated as resistant at 70°C with even fluorocarbon rubber losing 20% of its tensile strength in E85.
When exposed to biodiesel, elastomers were affected in two ways: firstly, by absorption of liquid by the elastomers and, secondly, by dissolution of soluble components from the elastomers into the liquid medium. Swelling was the result of the high absorption by the elastomers CR, CSM, EPDM, IIR and NBR in comparison to their dis-solution in non-aged and two years aged biodiesel. FKM, VMQ and PA were evaluated as resistant sealing materials in non-aged biodiesel at 40°C. FKM was still resistant in aged biodiesel at 40°C but only to a limited degree at 70°C.
The sealing materials CR, CSM, EPDM, IIR, NBR and VMQ were damaged to a high extent in non-aged and one year aged B10 as a result of swelling up to 70°C. FVMQ and PA can be evaluated as resistant in non-aged and one year aged B10 at 20°C and 40°C. However, FKM was evaluated as resistant up to 70°C.
The exposure tests showed that all the elastomers tested were resistant in the premium-grade fuel Super at 20°C. On increasing the temperature to 40°C, only FKM, VMQ and PA were resistant to Super. At 70°C FKM showed the best resistance.
Resistance to stress cracking by wetting solution is one of the selected properties together with the corresponding test method FNCT and tolerances for a comparison of polyethylene grades of one design type in the procedural rule on suitability proof for alternative plastic resins used for packagings and intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) for the transport of dangerous goods.
The environmental stress crack resistance determined by Full Notch Creep Test (FNCT) represents the impacts from the stacking tests at 40 °C performed with standard liquid wetting solution (without pre-storage) and with normal butyl acetate saturated wetting solution (pre-storage with normal butyl acetate).
Environmental stress crack resistance determined with FNCT for the polyethylene grades was related to the times to failure of different jerrican samples made of these grades in stacking tests with 5% wetting solution and a n-butyl acetate saturated wetting solution (pre-storage with n-butyl acetate) at 40 °C. The FNCT is suitable for comparison of polyethylene grades in relation to environmental stress crack resistance independent of their use as drum, IBC or jerrican material. The stiffness of polyethylene grades should be taken into account to the comparison as jerricans are not only chemically but also mechanically stressed.
Datenbank Gefahrgut - aktuelle Funktionalitäten für den Bereich Verpackung sowie geplanter Ausbau
(2010)
Use of higher-alloyed metallic materials and duplex steels for transport tanks of dangerous goods
(2011)
Compatibility evaluations of selected metallic materials under the influence of dangerous goods are published in the BAM-List - Requirements for Tanks for the Transport of Dangerous Goods” as basis for substance-related prototype approvals for tank Containers designed for the carriage of dangerous goods.
There is a request of the tank manufacturing industry and transportation Companies to incorporate additional materials into the BAM-List, especially corrosionresistant materials because of the large number of corrosive dangerous goods.
One solution to solve corrosion Problems is to line the tank with a polymeric material, an alternative solution is the application of high-alloyed stainless steels and nickel-based alloys as there are alloy 926 (1.4529), alloy 31 (1.4562) and alloy 59 (2.4605).
But there is an interest to use cost-efficient steels with high strength values and concomitant adequate corrosion resistance such as duplex Steel 1.4362 too. This Steel grade was originally developed as a substitute for the austenitic grades 1.4404 and 1.4571. Due to the lower content of the alloy elements nickel and molybdenum this duplex steel is a cost-efficient alternative to molybdenum containing austenite.
Due to the limited number of corrosion test results with welded test samples of these high-alloyed materials and the duplex steel under the influence of corrosive dangerous goods a comprehensive test Programme was performed with these materials in Cooperation with ThyssenKrupp VDM and Deutsche Edelstahlwerke GmbH.
It can be concluded from the test results that the "superaustenitic steels” 1.4529 and 1.4562 as well as the nickel-based alloy 2.4605 are a really good alternative as tank materials for the transport of dangerous goods in comparison to the lining of the tanks. Due to the reduced alloying content, in particular Nickel (3.7 %) and Molybdenum (0.15 %), a lower resistance of the duplex steel 1.4362 compared to the austenitic CrNiMo-steels was observed in acidic media. The duplex Steel is an alternative to the austenitic steels, especially in alkaline media. The test results are included in the current 10th edition of the BAM-List and therefore available for the costumer.
The notched impact strength at -30 °C is one of the selected properties, together with the corresponding test method and tolerances, for a comparison of polyethylene grades of one design type in the procedural rule on suitability proof for alternative plastic resins used for packagings and intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) for the transport of dangerous goods.
The marginal drop heights determined with the drop test at -18 °C after pre-storage of the test samples with 55 % nitric acid at 40 °C only partly related to the notched impact strength at -30 °C. The Charpy method is only suitable for classifying the grade in relation to toughness behavior and using this classification for comparison with other grades. Notched impact strength can provide a qualitative indication if the test samples fail under shock forces.
Conditioning the design types with 55 % nitric acid for 21 days at 40 °C causes an increase in the marginal drop heights of the design types in drop tests at -18 °C when compared with design types without pre-storage. Post-crosslinking of the grades increases stiffness because of the acidic influence.
The notched impact strength at -30 °C is one of the selected properties, together with the corresponding test method and tolerances, for a comparison of polyethylene grades of one design type in the procedural rule on suitability proof for alternative plastic resins used for packagings and intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) for the transport of dangerous goods.
The marginal drop heights determined with the drop test at -18 °C after pre-storage of the test samples with 55 % nitric acid at 40 °C only partly related to the notched impact strength at -30 °C. The Charpy method is only suitable for classifying the grade in relation to toughness behavior and using this classification for comparison with other grades. Notched impact strength can provide a qualitative indication if the test samples fail under shock forces.
Conditioning the design types with 55 % nitric acid for 21 days at 40 °C causes an increase in the marginal drop heights of the design types in drop tests at -18 °C when compared with design types without pre-storage. Post-crosslinking of the grades increases stiffness because of the acidic influence.
For the characterization and the comparison of polyethylene grades used for the manufacture of packaging and intermediate bulk container, the following parameters are required: melt flow rate (MFR), density (D), low-temperature notched impact strength, full notch creep test (FNCT) and increase of MFR by molecular degradation (resistance to oxidative degradation). The relationship between these material parameters determined on the basis of specimens prepared from compression-moulded sheets of polyethylene grades and the test behaviour of packaging has been investigated in several tests. The environmental stress crack resistance determined by FNCT represents the impacts from the stacking tests performed with standard liquid wetting solution (without pre-storage) and with normal butyl-acetate-saturated wetting solution (pre-storage with normal butyl acetate). Resistance to molecular degradation by the determination of MFR increase is related to the impacts in drop tests and stacking tests performed after pre-storage for 21 days with standard liquid 55% nitric acid at 40°C. The low-temperature impact strength is directly comparable with the impacts in drop tests at -18°C performed without pre-storage and after pre-storage with 55% nitric acid. A partly good relationship was found between the test results and the material parameters. Conditioning the design types with 55% nitric acid for 21 days causes an increase in the marginal drop heights of the design types in drop tests at -18°C when compared with design types without pre-storage. Post-cross-linking of the grades increases stiffness because of the acidic influence.
Ziel dieser Untersuchungen war die Bewertung der Beständigkeit häufig eingesetzter Dichtungswerkstoffe, wie FKM, FVMQ, VMQ, EPDM, CR, CSM, IIR, PA, NBR und PUR in Kraftstoffen und Heizöl mit und ohne biogene Zusätze bei 20 °C, 40 °C und 70 °C. E10, E85, Dieselkraftstoff mit max. 5 % Biodiesel, ungealtertes und 2 Jahre gealtertes B10 (Heizöl mit 10 % Biodiesel), reiner Dieselkraftstoff, Heizöl und Kraftstoff Super plus zählten zu den Testsubstanzen. Masse, Zugfestigkeit und Bruchdehnung wurden von den Prüfkörpern vor und nach der 84-tägigen Auslagerung in den Kraftstoffen und Heizöl bestimmt. Die visuelle Begutachtung einiger Elastomerprüfkörper zeigte eindeutig die hohe Quellung bis zur partiellen Auflösung. Die Shore-Härte A und D (für PA) der Prüfkörper wurden vor und nach der 42-tägigen Auslagerung in den Kraftstoffen bestimmt. In den internationalen Normen wird zur Bewertung der Beständigkeit von Elastomeren kein Grenzwert der Reduzierung der Zugeigenschaften und der Shore-Härte definiert. Deshalb wurde für die Beständigkeitsbewertung ein Grenzwert von 15 % festgelegt. Zusammenfassend kann die Aussage getroffen werden, dass die Beständigkeit der Fluorpolymere FKM und FVMQ in den Kraftstoffen und Heizöl mit und ohne biogene Zusätze die beste ist.
Die BAM-Liste - Anforderungen an Tanks für die Beförderung gefährlicher Güter – mit den Beständigkeitsbewertungen metallischer und polymerer Werkstoffe ist Grundlage für die stoffbezogenen Baumusterzulassungen für Tankcontainer und ortsbewegliche Tanks zur Beförderung gefährlicher Güter durch die BAM seit der Herausgabe der 1. Auflage 1989. Diese Beständigkeitsbewertungen werden nicht nur bundesweit, sondern weltweit als Erkenntnisquelle genutzt. Für die Zulassung von Kesselwagen und Tankfahrzeugen werden diese Daten auch herangezogen. Die Werkstoffbeständigkeitsdaten und der damit verbundene Informationsservice der BAM haben mit Sicherheit dazu beigetragen, Leckagen von Tanks aufgrund des Einsatzes von Tanks/Kesselwagen aus einem gegenüber dem Füllgut unbeständigem Tankwerkstoff oder Dichtungswerkstoff zu vermeiden.
8iofuels including ethanol and biodiesel (fatty acid methyl ester) represent an important renewable fuel alternative to petroleum-derived transport fuels. lncreasing biofuels use would bring some benefits, such as a reduction in oil demands and greenhause gas emissions, and an improvement in air quality.
Materials compatibility is a major concern whenever the fuel composition is changed in a fuel system. Therefore frequently used sealing materials such as FKM (fluorocarbon rubber), FVMQ (methyl-fluoro-silicone rubber), VMQ (methyl-vinyl-silicone rubber), EPDM (ethylene-propylene-diene rubber), CR (chloroprene rubber), CSM (chlorosulfonated polyethylene), IIR (butyl rubber), PA (polyamides), N8R (acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber) and PUR (polyester urethane rubber) were exposed to E1 0, diese I fuel with 5% biodiesel, non-aged and 2 year aged 810 (heating oil with 10% biodiesel), and for comparison to pure diese! fuel, standard heating oil and Super plus without bioethanol at 20 °C, 40 oc and 70 oc for 84 days. Mass, tensile strength and breaking elongation of the test specimens were determined before and after the exposure. The visual examination of some elastomer test specimens clearly showed the great volume increase until break or partial dissolution. Shore hardness A and D (for PA) were determined before and after exposure of the test specimens to the biofuels for 42 days.
There is not determined a threshold for the reduction in tensile properties and Shore hardness in the international standards. Therefore a threshold of 15% was determined for the evaluation of the compatibility.
The sealing materials FKM, EPDM, N8R, FMVQ, CSM and PA were evaluated on the basis of this threshold as resistant in E1 0 at 20 oc and 40 °C. FKM, FVMQ and PA were resistant at 40 oc , and none of the materials were resistant at 70 °C. FKM and FVMQ absorbed much less 810 and swelled less. CR, CSM, EPDM, IIR, N8R and VMQ were not resistant to 810 at all at 20 oc, 40 oc and 70 oc as the decrease in the tensile properties was significantly over 50%. FVMQ and PA could be evaluated as resistant in non-aged and two year aged 810 at 20 oc and 40 oc, whereas FKM was resistant up to 70 °C. FKM, PA and PUR were evaluated as resistant in standard heating oil and pure diese! fuel at temperatures up to 40°C, only FKM was resistant up to 70°C. FVMQ, FKM, N8R, VMQ, CR and IIR can be evaluated as resistant in premium grade fuel Super plus without ethanol at 20 oc. FKM, FVMQ, VMQ and IIR were still resistant at 40 °C. FKM and FVMQ were evaluated as resistant with restrictions at 70 °C.
ln summary, it can be therefore stated that the chemical resistance of the fluoropolymers FKM and FVMQ in fuels and biofuels is the best one.
The objective of this research was to determine the resistance of frequently used sealing materials such as FKM, FVMQ, VMQ, EPDM, CR, CSM, IIR, PA, NBR and PUR in fuels and heating oil with and without admixtures of biogenic sources such as E10, diesel fuel with 5 % biodiesel, non-aged and 2 year aged B10 (heating oil with 10 % biodiesel), pure diesel, standard heating oil and premium grade fuel Super plus at 20 °C, 40 °C and 70 °C.
Mass, tensile strength and breaking elongation of the test specimens were determined before and after the exposure for 84 days in the fuels. The visual examination of some elastomer test specimens clearly showed the great volume increase until break or partial dissolution. Shore hardness A and D (for PA) were determined before and after exposure of the test specimens in the biofuels for 42 days.
There is not determined a threshold for the reduction in tensile properties and Shore hardness in the international standards. Therefore a threshold of 15 % was determined for the evaluation of the compatibility.
In summary, it can be therefore stated that the chemical resistance of the fluoropolymers FKM and FVMQ in fuels and biofuels is the best one.
Die BAM-Liste - Anforderungen an Tanks für die Beförderung gefährlicher Güter – mit den Beständigkeitsbewertungen metallischer und polymerer Werkstoffe ist Grundlage für die stoffbezogenen Baumusterzulassungen für Tankcontainer und ortsbewegliche Tanks zur Beförderung gefährlicher Güter durch die BAM seit der Herausgabe der 1. Auflage 1989. Diese Beständigkeitsbewertungen werden nicht nur bundesweit, sondern weltweit als Erkenntnisquelle genutzt. Für die Zulassung von Kesselwagen und Tankfahrzeugen werden diese Daten auch herangezogen. Die Werkstoffbeständigkeitsdaten und der damit verbundene Informationsservice der BAM haben mit Sicherheit dazu beigetragen, Leckagen von Tanks aufgrund des Einsatzes von Tanks/Kesselwagen aus einem gegenüber dem Füllgut unbeständigem Tankwerkstoff oder Dichtungswerkstoff zu vermeiden.
The chemical industry has expressed great interest in using polyethylene terephthalate (PET) as material for packagings for the transport of dangerous goods. Due to the high strength and stiffness of PET, the wall thickness and weight of packagings can be reduced. This is a relevant cost factor. PET is a semi-crystalline thermoplast which is produced by polycondensation of terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol.
According to the European dangerous goods regulations RID and ADR, samples of PET design types of packagings for dangerous goods must be pre-stored with the original filling good for six months at 23°C, before the design type tests can be carried out. For packagings made of polyethylene (PE) tests to prove the stress cracking resistance by using laboratory methods are possible to reduce time and costs. Therefore, standard liquids, simulating the different types of damaging effects on PE are defined in RID and ADR. However, there is no information and research available about the damaging mechanisms on PET in comparison to PE, especially regarding to stress cracking resistance and test methods.
The aim of this work is to compare the stress cracking resistance of PE and PET with the Full Notch Creep Test (FNCT), which was developed by chemical industry and is described in the standards EN ISO 16101 and EN 15507. It was investigated whether testing specimens made of PE and PET with a full coplanar notch around the middle of the specimens show weakening after the impact of a tensile force in a wetting solution (Lutensol® FSA 10) at 50°C in a test device on the basis of the FNCT.
The test results confirmed the suitability of the method for eight PE grades. Unfortunately, this method couldn’t be used for PET because the specimens broke during notching. In addition the molding of the sheets and the following temper process for twelve hours are very time-consuming, and the specimens broke during notching due to the high brittleness of PET.
Another possibility to provide evidence of stress cracking resistance of PE packagings is laid down in BAM’s Dangerous Goods Rule BAM-GGR 015. This test was carried out with PE and PET bottles to compare both materials. Therefore 1l test bottles were filled with a 5% wetting solution and mounted with a clamping tool for 28 days at 40°C. Tensile test specimens were cut out afterwards from the middle of the bottles in the deformed areas. Tensile strength and breaking elongation of PE specimens were determined in comparison to the PET specimens. The tensile properties of the PET specimens couldn’t be determined due to the strength and the stiffness of the material.
In conclusion the only way to provide information about the stress cracking resistance of PET was to perform stacking tests. 1l bottles made of PE and PET were filled with a 5% wetting solution and stored with a stacking load for 28 days at 40°C according to EN ISO 16495. Design types of PE and PET both passed the stacking tests.
Seitens der Industrie besteht großes Interesse, Polyethylenterephthalat (PET) als Werkstoff für Verpackungen zum Transport von Gefahrgütern einzusetzen, da aufgrund der hohen Festigkeit und Steifigkeit von PET die Wanddicken und somit die Kosten der Verpackungen reduziert werden können. Die Prüfung der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von Polyethylenformstoffen als Werkstoffe von Verpackungen erfolgt mit Labormethoden unter Verwendung einer Standardflüssigkeit als Prüfmedium für die Spannungsrisse auslösende Wirkung auf Polyethylen (PE), wodurch Zeit und Kosten der Prüfungen reduziert werden.
Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, eine Laborprüfmethode zum Vergleich der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von PE und PET auf ihre Anwendbarkeit zu prüfen, wie z.B. den Full Notch Creep Test (FNCT). Es wurde untersucht, ob die Prüfkörper aus PE und PET mit umlaufender Kerbe in dieser durch die chemische Industrie entwickelten und von der BAM konzipierten Apparatur auf der Basis des FNCT zu messbaren Ergebnissen unter Einfluss eines Ölsäureamidethoxylates als Netzmittel bei 50 °C führen.
Die Testergebnisse bestätigten die Eignung des Prüfverfahrens für die acht eingesetzten Formstoffe aus PE. Dieses Prüfverfahren konnte nicht für PET angewandt werden, da die Prüfkörper aufgrund der hohen Festigkeit und Steifigkeit des PET beim Kerbvorgang zerbrachen. Die gleiche Aussage konnte für den Nachweis der der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von Verpackungen, der in der BAM Gefahrgutregel BAM-GGR 015 beschrieben wird, getroffen werden. Die einzige Möglichkeit zum Nachweis der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von PET besteht in der Durchführung von Stapeldruckprüfungen.
Zusammenfassend wird aufgrund der Ergebnisse der durchgeführten Untersuchungen die Aussage getroffen, dass die Fluorpolymere FKM und FVMQ die beständigsten Dichtungswerkstoffe in Biokraftstoffen und Heizöl B10 im Temperaturbereich bis 70 °C sind. In E10 und E85 kann keiner der Dichtungswerkstoffe bei 70 °C als beständig bewertet werden. Diese Erkenntnisse können vielen Wirtschaftszweigen ein Innovationspotential bieten und ihre Wettbewerbsfähigkeit steigern.
Materials compatibility is a major concern whenever the fuel composition is changed in a fuel system. The question arises of whether sealing materials are resistant to fuels with bioethanol and biodiesel (rapeseed oil fatty acid methyl ester).
The objective of this research was to determine the resistance of frequently used sealing materials such as FKM (fluorocarbon rubber), FVMQ (methyl-fluoro-silicone rubber), VMQ (methyl-vinyl-silicone rubber), EPDM (ethylene-propylene-diene rubber), CR (chloroprene rubber), CSM (chlorosulfonated polyethylene), IIR (butyl rubber), PA (polyamides), NBR (acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber) and PUR (polyester urethane rubber) in aged fuels and heating oil with admixtures of biogenic substances such as biodiesel and B10 (heating oil with 10% biodiesel).
The mass, tensile strength and breaking elongation of the test specimens were determined before and after exposure for 84 days in non-aged, one-year, two-year, three-year and four-year aged biodiesel and B10 according to DIN 53504 – “Testing of rubber - determination of tensile strength at break, tensile stress at yield, elongation at break and stress values in a tensile test”.
The visual examination of some elastomer test specimens clearly showed the great volume increase until breaking or partial dissolution. The Shore hardnesses A and D (for PA) were determined before and after exposure of the test specimens in the biofuels for 42 days according to DIN 53505 – “Testing of rubber – Shore A and Shore D hardness test”.
A threshold for the reduction in tensile properties and Shore hardness is not set in the international standards. Therefore, a threshold of 15 % was set for the evaluation of the compatibility.
Biodiesel fuels are easily oxidized and contain acids and water. The age of the biodiesel was not relevant for the sealing materials CR, CSM, EPDM, IIR and NBR, which were generally not resistant to biodiesel. FKM and PA showed high compatibility in non-aged, one-year, two-year, three-year and four- year aged biodiesel, which was attributed to the absence of polarity. The decrease in tensile properties and Shore hardness increased with the age and the temperature of the biodiesel, but the measured values were still lower than the defined threshold.
FKM and FVMQ absorbed much less non-aged and aged B10 and swelled less. CR, CSM, EPDM, IIR, NBR and VMQ were not resistant to B10 at all at 20°C, 40°C and 70°C as the decrease in the tensile properties was significantly over 50%.
FVMQ and PA could be evaluated as resistant in non-aged and aged B10 at 20°C and 40°C, whereas FKM was resistant up to 70°C despite the age of the B10. The damaging impact of B10 increased with the age and the temperature.
Seitens der Industrie besteht großes Interesse, Polyethylenterephthalat (PET) als Werkstoff für Verpackungen zum Transport von Gefahrgütern einzusetzen, da aufgrund der hohen Fes-tigkeit und Steifigkeit von PET die Wanddicken und somit die Kosten der Verpackungen reduziert werden können. Die Prüfung der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von Polyethylenformstoffen als Werkstoffe von Verpackungen erfolgt mit Labormethoden unter Verwendung einer Standardflüssigkeit als Prüfmedium für die Spannungsrisse auslösende Wirkung auf Polyethylen (PE), wodurch Zeit und Kosten der Prüfungen reduziert werden.
Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, eine Laborprüfmethode zum Vergleich der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von PE und PET auf ihre Anwendbarkeit zu prüfen, wie z.B. den Full Notch Creep Test (FNCT). Es wurde untersucht, ob die Prüfkörper aus PE und PET mit umlaufender Kerbe in dieser durch die chemische Industrie entwickelten und von der BAM konzipierten Apparatur auf der Basis des FNCT zu messbaren Ergebnissen unter Einfluss eines Ölsäureamidethoxylates als Netzmittel bei 50 °C führen.
Die Testergebnisse bestätigten die Eignung des Prüfverfahrens für die acht eingesetzten Formstoffe aus PE. Dieses Prüfverfahren konnte nicht für PET angewandt werden, da die Prüfkörper aufgrund der hohen Festigkeit und Steifigkeit des PET beim Kerbvorgang zerbrachen. Die gleiche Aussage konnte für den Nachweis der der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von Verpackungen, der in der BAM Gefahrgutregel BAM-GGR 015 beschrieben wird, getroffen werden. Die einzige Möglichkeit zum Nachweis der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von PET besteht in der Durchführung von Stapeldruckprüfungen.
Heizöllagerbehälter aus Kunststoffen (z.B. Polyethylen) sind für einen sicheren Betrieb von 30 Jahren, dem Zeitraum der Produkthaftung, ausgelegt. Die Tankhersteller empfehlen zur Gewährleistung der Sicherheit nach Ablauf von 30 Jahren den Ersatz dieser Behälter. Kunststoffe unterliegen im Laufe ihrer Nutzungsdauer der Alterung durch die Veränderung ihrer Eigenschaften. Das Ausmaß der Alterung und die Art des Abbauvorganges hängen im Wesentlichen vom chemischen Abbau des Kunststoffes, der Wanddicke des Behälters und den Umgebungsbedingungen ab. Aufgrund der Komplexität der Alterungsvorgänge sind Aussagen zum Langzeitverhalten bzw. zur Lebensdauer der Heizöllagerbehälter ohne geeignete Langzeitprüfungen problematisch. Bisher liegen keine Untersuchungen zum Langzeitverhalten der Kunststoffe vor, insbesondere nach einer Nutzungsdauer über 20 Jahre. In der BDH-Broschüre: Effiziente Systeme und erneuerbare Energien wird darauf hingewiesen, dass ca. 45 % der Heizöllagerbehälter aus Kunststoffen in Deutschland 26 Jahre und älter sind. Viele dieser Tankanlagen sind zudem noch nie von einem Sachverständigen überprüft worden. Schätzungen gehen davon aus, dass mehr als 10.000.000 Tankanlagen aus Kunststoffen in Deutschland vor 1987 errichtet wurden.
Ziel der Untersuchungen ist, den Schädigungsgrad der Kunststoffe im Vergleich zu den unbelasteten Werkstoffen zu ermitteln. Da die BAM bis Ende der 80-iger Jahre für die Zulassung dieser Behälter zuständig war, sind die Daten über den eingesetzten Werkstoff für den Vergleich noch vorhanden. Der Bundesverband Lagerbehälter e.V. und das Institut für Wärme und Oeltechnik (IWO) befürworten diese Untersuchungen, um eine Überalterung der Tankanlagen zu vermeiden. Diese Überalterung könnte die zukünftige Gefahr für die Heizöltankanlage sein, nicht der Wettbewerb mit anderen Energieformen.
Biofuels including ethanol and biodiesel (FAME) represent a renewable fuel alternative to petroleum-derived transport fuels. The aim of this work was to study the interaction between high density polyethylene (HDPE) with permeation barriers in form of polyamide (PA) and fluorination, and biofuels such as E85 (fuel with 85 % ethanol), biodiesel and B10 (heating oil with 10 % biodiesel). 10 l jerrycans made of polyethylene with permeation barrier of PA were filled with E85 and biodiesel and exposed to temperatures of 20 °C and 40 °C for 5 years. Half of the 20 l jerrycans of HDPE for filling with B10 were fluorinated at the inner layer to prevent permeation before the exposure. Tensile properties were determined once a year, and FTIR-spectroscopy was used to evaluate possible changes.
The tensile properties tensile strength and breaking elongation of HDPE jerrycan cuttings with permeation barrier decreased, but not significantly, after immersion in E85, biodiesel and B10. The elasticity modulus of the polyethylene grades was especially reduced during exposure to E85.
The FTIR spectra of HDPE jerrycan cuttings with permeation barrier showed that immersion tests for five years with the test fuels at 20 °C and 40 °C did not lead to a decomposition of the permeation barriers.
Biofuels including ethanol and biodiesel (FAME) represent a renewable fuel alternative to petroleum-derived transport fuels. The aim of this work was to study the interaction between high density polyethylene (HDPE) with permeation barriers in form of polyamide (PA) and fluorination, and biofuels such as E85 (fuel with 85 % ethanol), biodiesel and B10 (heating oil with 10 % biodiesel). 10 l jerrycans made of polyethylene with permeation barrier of PA were filled with E85 and biodiesel and exposed to temperatures of 20 °C and 40 °C for 5 years. Half of the 20 l jerrycans of HDPE for filling with B10 were fluorinated at the inner layer to prevent permeation before the exposure. Tensile properties were determined once a year, and FTIR-spectroscopy was used to evaluate possible changes.
The tensile properties tensile strength and breaking elongation of HDPE jerrycan cuttings with permeation barrier decreased, but not significantly, after immersion in E85, biodiesel and B10. The elasticity modulus of the polyethylene grades was especially reduced during exposure to E85.
The FTIR spectra of HDPE jerrycan cuttings with permeation barrier showed that immersion tests for five years with the test fuels at 20 °C and 40 °C did not lead to a decomposition of the permeation barriers.
The monitoring of oil and gas pipelines by means of distributed fibre optic sensors is becoming common. The most recent development in the field of fibre optic sensing is the distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), which allows to detect and to localize third party threats to pipelines. For this purpose, fibre optic telecommunication cables located close to the pipelines are usually used. However, DAS carries a far greater potential for continuous condition monitoring of pipelines.
The interdisciplinary research project AGIFAMOR (Ageing Infrastructures – Fibre Optic Monitoring of Pipes) at BAM investigates a new technical approach to extend the application field of DAS towards the detection and localization of acoustic signals that indicate critical alterations and certain damage scenarios originated from within the pipeline or the pipe wall. Therefore, the optical fibre sensors are applied onto the pipe itself and the application procedure towards an optimal acoustic signal transduction is optimized.
A number of laboratory scale experiments were performed focusing on the signal transmission of acoustic signals as well as the detection of damages in the pipe wall by means of DAS. Furthermore, real-scale tests on a pipeline DN100 of 38m length have been carried out at the BAM test site for technical safety (BAM-TTS) to study the detection and localization of leaks and of changing flow profiles due to corrosion or sedimentation processes.
Schäden an Rohrleitungen können zu hohen Umweltbelastungen und wirtschaftlichen Schäden führen. Um die dauerhafte Verfügbarkeit der Infrastruktur zu gewährleisten, wird im Rahmen des Projekts AGIFAMOR an der Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) erprobt, inwiefern das Verfahren der verteilten akustischen faseroptischen Sensorik (Distributed acoustic sensing – DAS) zur kontinuierlichen Überwachung von Rohrleitungen eingesetzt werden kann. Neben der DAS werden erprobte Verfahren der zerstörungsfreien Prüfung wie Schallemissionsanalyse (SEA) und Beschleunigungssensoren eingesetzt. An dieser Stelle soll detailliert auf die Hauptschadensursachen an Rohrleitungen, den Versuchsstand zur mechanischen Belastung von Rohren sowie die Möglichkeiten zu Untersuchungen im Realmaßstab eingegangen werden.
Heizöllagerbehälter aus Polyethylenformstoffen werden seit Beginn der 70-iger Jahre in Deutschland hergestellt. Die Hersteller empfehlen zur Gewährleistung der Sicherheit nach Ablauf von 30 Jahren den Ersatz dieser Behälter. Polyethylenformstoffe unterliegen im Laufe ihrer Nutzungsdauer der Alterung durch die Veränderung ihrer Eigenschaften. Das Ausmaß der Alterung und die Art des Abbauvorganges hängen im Wesentlichen vom chemischen Abbau des Polyethylens, der Wanddicke des Behälters und den Umgebungsbedingungen ab. Bisher lagen keine Untersuchungen zum Langzeitverhalten der Polyethylenformstoffe vor, insbesondere nach einer Nutzungsdauer der Tanks über 30 Jahre. Ziel der Untersu-chungen war, den tatsächlichen Schädigungsgrad der Polyethylenformstoffe im Vergleich zu den unbelasteten Formstoffen zu ermitteln. Da die BAM bis Mitte der 90-iger Jahre für die Prüfungen und Gutachten zur Zulassung dieser Behälter zuständig war, sind die Werkstoffdaten noch vorhanden.
Als Untersuchungsmethoden wurden die Bestimmung der Schmelze-Masse-Fließrate (MFR) und die Fourier-Transformation-IR-Spektroskopie (FTIR) von Tankausschnitten aus dem Bereich des Bodens, des Mantels und des Daches von 10 ausgesonderten Behältern aus den Polyethylenformstoffen A und B herangezogen. Die Messungen der MFR der Tankaus-schnitte aus diesen Bereichen zeigten Unterschiede in den Werten in Abhängigkeit vom Ge-wicht (5 kg oder 21,6 kg), welches eingesetzt wurde. Eine Abnahme der MFR-Werte wurde für die größere Anzahl der Tankwandungsausschnitte aus dem Formstoff B nach einer Lebensdauer der Tanks > 30 Jahre gemessen. Dieser Formstoff wurde hauptsächlich durch innere Alterung infolge Vernetzungen, Verzweigungen und Weichmacherverlust und weniger durch oxidativen Abbau geschädigt. Die FTIR-Messungen der Proben aus dem Bereich des Bodens und des Mantels der Tanks zeigten, dass die Intensität der asymmetrischen/symmetrischen CH2 -Streckschwingungen im Bereich: 2800 - 2900 cm-1 und der CH2 -Biegeverformungsschwingung bei 1400 cm-1 aufgrund von Kettenspaltungen zugenommen haben. Die Intensität der Carbonylstreckschwingung C=O bei 1740 cm-1 ist niedrig. Sie ist ein Maß für die Oxidation des Polymerwerkstoffes.
Compatibility of polymeric materials with heating oil/biodiesel blends at different temperatures
(2019)
Materials compatibility is a major concern whenever the fuel composition is changed. The question arises of whether polymeric materials are resistant to heating oil with admixtures of 10 % biodiesel (B10) and 20 % biodiesel (B20).
The polarity of biodiesel increases its solvency and facilitates permeation and extrac-tion. Solvation, swelling and/or extraction lead to changes in the physical properties and chemical changes of polymeric materials.
The objective of this research was to determine the resistance of frequently used sealing materials such as FKM, EPDM, CR, CSM, NBR, IIR, VMQ, FVMQ, PA and PUR in up to four-year aged B10 for 84 days at 20 °C, 40 °C and 70 °C.
The polymeric materials: ACM, FKM, HNBR, PA, PE; POM, PUR and PVC were ex-posed to B20 for 84 days at 40°C and 70°C in another research project.
Mass, tensile strength, breaking elongation and Shore hardness A (D) of the test specimens were determined before and after the exposure for 84 (42) days in the heating oil blends B10 and B20.
There is not determined a threshold for the reduction in tensile properties and Shore hardness in the international standards. Therefore, a threshold of 15 % was deter-mined for the evaluation of the compatibility.
Measurements of the variations in mass, tensile properties and Shore hardness after exposure of the polymers in non-aged and aged heating oil B10 showed clearly that FKM, FVMQ and PA were the most resistant materials in B10. The elastomers CR, CSM, EPDM, IIR, NBR and VMQ were generally not resistant to B10. Damage to the materials increased with higher test temperatures and the age of B10.
FKM, POM and PVC showed high compatibility in B20 at 40°C and 70 °C. ACM, HNBR and PA were evaluated as resistant in B20 at 40 °C but not at 70°C.
Biofuels including ethanol and biodiesel (fatty acid methyl ester, FAME) represent an important renewable fuel alternative to petroleum-derived transport fuels. Increasing biofuels use would bring some benefits, such as a reduction in oil demands and greenhouse gas emissions, and an improvement in air quality. Materials compatibility is a major concern whenever the fuel composition is changed in a fuel system.
The objective of this research was to determine the resistance of frequently used sealing materials such as CR (chloroprene rubber), CSM (chlorosulfonated polyethylene), EPDM (ethylene-propylene-diene rubber), FKM (fluorocarbon rubber), FVMQ (methyl-fluorosilicone rubber), IIR (butyl rubber), NBR (acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber), PA (polyamides), PUR (polyester urethane rubber) and VMQ (methyl-vinyl-silicone rubber), in heating oil with admixtures of biogenic sources such as E10 (fuel with max. 10 % ethanol), E85 (fuel with 85 % ethanol), non-aged and aged biodiesel, diesel fuel with 5 % biodiesel, non-aged and aged B10 (heating oil with 10 % biodiesel) at 20 °C, 40 °C and 70 °C. Mass, tensile strength and breaking elongation of the test specimens were determined before and after the exposure for 84 days in the fuels. The visual examination of some elastomer test specimens clearly showed the great volume increase until break or partial dissolution. Shore hardness A and D (for PA) were determined before and after exposure of the test specimens in the biofuels for 42 days.
There is not determined a threshold for the reduction in tensile properties and Shore hardness in the international standards. Therefore, a threshold of 15 % was set for the evaluation of the compatibility. The sealing materials CR, CSM, EPDM, IIR and NBR were generally not resistant to biodiesel and B10. In summary, it can be therefore stated that the chemical resistance of the fluoropolymers FKM and FVMQ in fuels and biofuels is the best one.
Das Gefährdungspotential von Rohrleitungen hängt primär von den Eigenschaften des durchfließenden Stoffes, den Betriebsbedingungen und den äußeren Beanspruchungen ab. Zu den Hauptschadensursachen an Rohrleitungen zählen Korrosion, Druckstöße und Kavitationsschläge, Zeitstandbeanspruchung, struktur- und fluidmechanische Schwingungen, Fremdberührungen, elektrische Fremdbeeinflussung und geologische Besonderheiten im Bereich des Rohrleitungsverlaufes.
Impact of biocomponents in the fuel and heating oil on the compatibility of sealing materials
(2016)
The objective of this research was to determine the resistance of frequently used sealing materials such as FKM, FVMQ, VMQ, EPDM, CR, CSM, IIR, PA, NBR and PUR in fuels and heating oil with and without admixtures of biogenic sources such as E10, diesel fuel with 5 % biodiesel, non-aged and 2 year aged B10 (heating oil with 10 % biodiesel), pure diesel, standard heating oil and premium grade fuel Super plus at 20 °C, 40 °C and 70 °C.
Mass, tensile strength and breaking elongation of the test specimens were determined before and after the exposure for 84 days in the fuels. The visual examination of some elastomer test specimens clearly showed the great volume increase until break or partial dissolution. Shore hardness A and D (for PA) were determined before and after exposure of the test specimens in the biofuels for 42 days.
There is not determined a threshold for the reduction in tensile properties and Shore hardness in the international standards. Therefore a threshold of 15 % was determined for the evaluation of the compatibility.
In summary, it can be therefore stated that the chemical resistance of the fluoropolymers FKM and FVMQ in fuels and biofuels is the best one.