Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (5)
- Handbuch (5)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (3)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (2)
- Vortrag (1)
Schlagworte
- SADT (5)
- Flammpunkt (4)
- Prüfmethoden (4)
- Adiabatische Lagerprüfung (3)
- Ammoniumnitrat (3)
- Außenbrandprüfung (3)
- BAM Fallhammer (3)
- BAM Reibapparat (3)
- BAM Trauzl Prüfung (3)
- Ballistische Mörserprüfung (3)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (1)
Many substances react with water in such a way that flammable gases are formed. For transport issues this reaction may possess a considerable hazard especially if the cargo is wetted by rain or by water from other sources. In the UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods these kinds of problems are addressed. The UN test N.5 'Test method for substances which in contact with water emit flammable gases' corresponds to this hazard. Classification according to the test method is done by measurement of the gas evolution rate of the flammable gas by any suitable procedure. At BAM a gravimetric approach is used to measure the gas evolution rate. In this paper we present the evaluation of the apparatus by means of an absolute calibration routine utilizing a reaction where a known amount of gas is produced as well as the evaluation of important parameters influencing the gas evolution rate using different substances. It can be shown that the apparatus is capable of measuring absolute gas volumes as low as 6 mL with an acceptable error of about 17% as determined from the reaction of Mg with demineralized water.
Die "Empfehlungen für die Beförderung gefährlicher Güter, Handbuch über Prüfungen und Kriterien" ergänzen die "Empfehlungen für die Beförderung gefährlicher Güter, Modellvorschriften" und das "Global harmonisierte System zur Einstufung und Kennzeichnung von Chemikalien (GHS)". Sie enthalten Kriterien, Prüfmethoden und –verfahren, die angewendet werden sowohl für die Einstufung gefährlicher Güter nach den Vorschriften der Teile 2 und 3 der Modellvorschriften als auch für Chemikalien, von denen nach dem GHS physikalische Gefahren ausgehen.
We present our results on the comparison of two methods for the SADT determination. Both methods, UN test H.1 and UN test H.4 are recommended by the international transport regulations from the UN. But during the last years the applicability of the UN test H.4 has been questioned for solid substances. Therefore, three organic peroxides and one self-reactive substance have been investigated in 5 kg and 20 kg packages as well as in the UN test H.4 in a 500 mL Dewar vessel. The SADT values determined with the different methods match. The UN test H.4 seems to be well suited for solid organic peroxides and self-reactive substances of at least 20 kg or 60 L.
We present our results on the comparsion of two methods for the SADT determination. Both methods, UN test H.1 and UN test H.4 are recommended by the international transport regulations from the UN. But during the last years the applicability of the UN test H.4 has been questioned for solid substances. Therefore, three organic peroxidesand one self-reactive substance have been investigated in 5 kg and 20 kg packages as well as in the UN test H.4 in a 500 mL dewar vessel. The SADT values determined with the different methods match. The UN test H.4 seems to be well suited also for solid substances at least for 20 kg or 60 L.