Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (8)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (5)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (1)
- Dissertation (1)
Schlagworte
- Erstarrungsriss (5)
- MVT (5)
- Heißriss (4)
- Heißrisse (4)
- Solidification cracking (4)
- Varestraint test (4)
- LTT (3)
- Schweißen (3)
- Welding (3)
- Hot cracking (2)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Paper des Monats
- ja (1)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (8)
Ermittlung eines allgemeingültigen Erstarrungsrisskennwerts durch Abstraktion gängiger Heißrisstests
(2017)
Ergebnisse von Untersuchungen zur Heißrissanfälligkeit metallischer Werkstoffe, die aus gängigen Heißrisstests gewonnen wurden, sind i.A. schlecht mit Ergebnissen aus anderen Testverfahren vergleichbar. Darüber hinaus ist die Fehlererkennungsgenauigkeit der etablierten Testverfahren mitunter dürftig.
Nach der Konzeption eines neuartigen, geeigneten Verfahrens zur Bestimmung der Erstarrungsrissneigung weitestgehend unabhängig von Prozesseinflüssen, fasst dieser Vortrag nun die Validierung der experimentellen Vorgehensweise zusammen.
Die Verwendung von Low Transformation Temperature (LTT) Schweißzusatzwerkstoffen ist eine innovative Möglichkeit, um beim Schweißen von hochfesten Stählen die schweißbedingten Zugeigenspannungen zu reduzieren. Durch die Zugabe von Legierungselementen, wie beispielsweise Nickel oder Mangan haben diese Werkstoffe eine, im Vergleich zu herkömm-lichen Schweißzusatzwerkstoffen deutlich herabgesetzte Martensitstarttemperatur (MS). Dadurch ist es möglich, die schweißbedingten Zugeigenspannungen mit LTT-Schweißzusatz-werkstoffen gezielt zu reduzieren oder sogar Druckeigenspannungen zu erzeugen.
Im Verlauf vorangegangener Arbeiten hat sich herausgestellt, dass einige der untersuchten LTT-Legierungen aufgrund ihres Erstarrungs- bzw. Seigerungsverhaltens eine gegenüber vielen konventionellen Schweiß-zusatzwerkstoffen erhöhte Heißrisssensibilität aufweisen.
Die aktuellen Arbeiten zielen darauf, die Heißrissneigung neuartiger LTT-Schweißzusatzwerkstoffe weiter zu ergründen.
Solidification cracking of metals is a well-researched topic in the field of welding science. A material’s susceptibility to solidification cracking can be tested using numerous different specialized test procedures, one of which is the Modified Varestraint-/Transvarestraint test (MVT). It was developed at BAM in 1982 and is internationally standardised. Over the decades, this test has been extensively used to characterise the solidification cracking resistance of many different materials.
The present study was conducted to further investigate the influences of the standardised MVT testing parameters, as well as the characteristics of evaluation methods on the results. Several different high alloyed martensitic LTT (low transformation temperature) filler materials, CrNi and CrMn type, were used. In previous pilot studies, these alloys have shown a rather distinctive solidification cracking behaviour. During testing, energy input per unit length and bending speed were varied (especially the latter is usually kept at standard values), in addition to the most commonly altered factor - total deformation.
First, the effects of different process parameter sets on the solidification cracking response were measured using the standard approach - microscopic analysis of the specimen surface. It was found that not all parameter changes had the expected outcome. For the Cr8Ni6 and Cr11Mn5 filler materials, influences of energy input per unit length and welding speed were in direct opposition.
In order to investigate those apparent contradictions, μCT scans of MVT specimens were made. The results consistently show sub surface cracking, to significant, yet varying extents. Different primary solidification types were found using WDX-analysis, an aspect that is believed to be the main difference between the CrNi- and CrMn-type materials and their cracking characteristics.
Results show that when it comes to testing of modern high-performance alloys, one set of standard MVT testing parameters might not be equally suitable for all materials. Also, to properly accommodate different solidification types, sub-surface cracking has to be taken into account.
Solidification cracking of metals is a well-researched topic in the field of welding science. A material’s susceptibility to solidification cracking can be tested using numerous different specialized test procedures, one of which is the Modified Varestraint-/Transvarestraint test (MVT). It was developed at BAM in 1982 and is internationally standardised. Over the decades, this test has been extensively used to characterise the solidification cracking resistance of many different materials.
The present study was conducted to further investigate the influences of the standardised MVT testing parameters, as well as the characteristics of evaluation methods on the results. Several different high alloyed martensitic LTT (low transformation temperature) filler materials, CrNi and CrMn type, were used. In previous pilot studies, these alloys have shown a rather distinctive solidification cracking behaviour (Fig. 1). During testing, energy input per unit length and bending speed were varied (especially the latter is usually kept at standard values), in addition to the most commonly altered factor - total deformation.
First, the effects of different process parameter sets on the solidification cracking response were measured using the standard approach - microscopic analysis of the specimen surface. It was found that not all parameter changes had the expected outcome. For the Cr8Ni6 and Cr11Mn5 filler materials, influences of energy input per unit length and welding speed were in direct opposition.
In order to investigate those apparent contradictions, µCT scans of MVT specimens were made. The results consistently show sub surface cracking, to significant, yet varying extents. Different primary solidification types were found using WDX-analysis, an aspect that is believed to be the main difference between the CrNi- and CrMn-type materials and their cracking characteristics.
Results show that when it comes to testing of modern high-performance alloys, one set of standard MVT testing parameters might not be equally suitable for all materials. Also, to properly accommodate different solidification types, sub-surface cracking has to be taken into account.
Ermittlung eines allgemeingültigen Erstarrungsrisskennwerts durch Abstraktion gängiger Heißrisstests
(2017)
Ergebnisse von Untersuchungen zur Heißrissanfälligkeit metallischer Werkstoffe, die aus gängigen Heißrisstests gewonnen wurden, sind i.A. schlecht mit Ergebnissen aus anderen Testverfahren vergleichbar. Darüber hinaus ist die Fehlererkennungsgenauigkeit der etablierten Testverfahren mitunter dürftig. Auch die Übertragbarkeit der rein Werkstoff-orientieren Testergebnisse auf reale Bauteile gestaltet sich schwierig. Insgesamt ist das Phänomen der Heißrissbildung nicht ausreichend erforscht und verstanden, als dass es in Konstruktion und/oder Bauteilfertigung vorhergesagt werden könnte.
Die vorliegende Arbeit befasst sich mit der Abstraktion gängiger Testverfahren, um verfahrensspezifische Einflüsse möglichst zu eliminieren, sodass eine universellere Beurteilung von Werkstoffen vorgenommen werden kann. Die gewonnenen Ergebnisse können so besser für Simulationen bzw. Vorhersagen der Heißrissanfälligkeit realer Bauteile herangezogen werden.
Solidification cracking of metals is a well-researched topic in the field of welding science. A material’s susceptibility to solidification cracking can be tested using numerous different specialized test procedures, one of which is the Modified Varestraint-/Transvarestraint test (MVT). It was developed at BAM in 1982 and is internationally standardised. Over the decades, this test has been extensively used to characterise the solidification cracking resistance of many different materials.
The present study was conducted to further investigate the influences of the standardised MVT testing parameters, as well as the characteristics of evaluation methods on the results. Several different high alloyed martensitic LTT (low transformation temperature) filler materials, CrNi and CrMn type, were used. In previous pilot studies, these alloys have shown a rather distinctive solidification cracking behaviour.
First, the effects of different process parameter sets on the solidification cracking response were measured using the standard approach. Subsequently, μCT scans were performed on the specimens. The results consistently show sub surface cracking, to significant, yet varying extents. Different Primary solidification types were found using WDX-analysis, an aspect that is regarded to be the main difference between the CrNi- and CrMn-type materials and their cracking characteristics.
Results show that when it comes to testing of modern high-performance alloys, one set of standard MVT testing parameters might not be equally suitable for all materials. Also, to properly accommodate different solidification types, sub-surface cracking has to be taken into account.
Various test methods are available for assessing the susceptibility of materials to solidification cracking during welding. In the widely used Varestraint test, the crack length is selected as a criterion as a function of the applied bending strain.
Unfortunately, the crack length does not characterize the material behavior alone but depends to varying degrees on the individual test parameters used, which makes the interpretation of the results difficult. In addition, the crack length is not comparable under different test conditions. To overcome these disadvantages, we have developed a novel evaluation methodology that decouples the machine influence from the material behavior. The measured crack length is related to the maximum possible value specified by welding speed and deformation time. This relative crack length is calculated numerically, considering the orientation of the cracks. Experiments on two high-alloy martensitic welding consumables show that, in contrast to the conventional evaluation, a comparison of different welding parameters becomes possible. Furthermore, the strain rate proved to be a suitable crack criterion in agreement with Prokhorov's hot cracking model.
Investigations on weldability often deal with hot cracking, as one of the most popular failure during weld fabrication. The modified varestraint transvarestraint hot cracking test (MVT) is well known for the assessment of the hot cracking susceptibility of materials. The shortcoming of this approach is that the information is only from the very near surface region, which inhibits access to the characteristic of the hot crack network in the bulk. Here, we report about a new approach, illustrated in the example of low transformation temperature (LTT) weld filler materials, to monitor the entire 3D hot crack network after welding by means of microfocus X-ray computer tomography (μCT).
Solidification Cracking Assessment of LTT Filler Materials by Means of Varestraint Testing and μCT
(2020)
Investigations of the weldability of metals often deal with hot cracking, as one of the most dreaded imperfections during weld fabrication. The hot cracking investigations presented in this paper were carried out as part of a study on the development of low transformation temperature (LTT) weld filler materials. These alloys allow to mitigate tensile residual stresses that usually arise during welding using conventional weld filler materials. By this means, higher fatigue strength and higher lifetimes of the weld can be achieved. However, LTT weld filler materials are for example, high-alloyed Cr/Ni steels that are susceptible to the formation of hot cracks. To assess hot cracking, we applied the standardized modified varestraint transvarestraint hot cracking test (MVT), which is well appropriate to evaluate different base or filler materials with regard to their hot cracking susceptibility. In order to consider the complete material volume for the assessment of hot cracking, we additionally applied microfocus X-ray computer tomography (μCT). It is shown that by a suitable selection of welding and MVT parameter the analysis of the complete 3D hot crack network can provide additional information with regard to the hot cracking model following Prokhorov. It is now possible to determine easy accessible substitute values (e.g., maximum crack depth) for the extent of the Brittleness Temperature Range (BTR) and the minimum critical strain Pmin.
The subject of this study is how, and to what extent, Varestraint/Transvarestraint test results are influenced by both testing parameters and characteristics of evaluation methods. Several different high-alloyed martensitic LTT (low Transformation temperature) filler materials, CrNi and CrMn type, were selected for examination due to their rather distinctive solidification cracking behaviour, which aroused interest after previous studies. First, the effects of different process parameter sets on the solidification cracking response were measured using standard approaches. Subsequently, microfocus X-ray computer tomography (μCT) scans were performed on the specimens. The results consistently show sub-surface cracking to significant yet varying extents. Different primary solidification types were found using wavelength dispersive X-ray (WDX) analysis conducted on filler metals with varying Cr/Ni equivalent ratios. This aspect is regarded as the main difference between the CrNiand CrMn-type materials in matters of cracking characteristics. Results show that when it comes to testing of modern highperformance alloys, one set of standard Varestraint testing parameters might not be equally suitable for all materials. Also, to properly accommodate different solidification types, sub-surface cracking has to be taken into account.