Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (12) (entfernen)
Sprache
- Englisch (12)
Schlagworte
- Additive Manufacturing (3)
- Additive manufacturing (3)
- Laser powder bed fusion (3)
- Diffraction elastic constants (2)
- Inconel 718 (2)
- LPBF (2)
- Neutron diffraction (2)
- Residual Stress (2)
- Residual stress analysis (2)
- Texture (2)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (12)
- 8.5 Röntgenbildgebung (12)
- 9 Komponentensicherheit (9)
- 9.4 Integrität von Schweißverbindungen (8)
- 5 Werkstofftechnik (3)
- 5.1 Mikrostruktur Design und Degradation (3)
- 8.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (2)
- 9.6 Additive Fertigung metallischer Komponenten (2)
- 5.2 Metallische Hochtemperaturwerkstoffe (1)
- 9.3 Schweißtechnische Fertigungsverfahren (1)
AbstractIn this study, we compare the residual stress state in a laser powder bed fusion (PBF‐LB/M) AlSi10Mg alloy in the as‐built (AB) condition with that after two different heat treatments (265 °C for 1 h, HT1; and 300 °C for 2 h, HT2). The bulk residual stress (RS) is determined using synchrotron X‐ray diffraction (SXRD), and near‐surface profiles are determined using laboratory energy‐dispersive X‐ray diffraction (EDXRD). The EDXRD results do not reveal any notable difference between the conditions at a depth of 350 μm, suggesting that the machining process yields a comparable residual stress state in the near‐surface regions. On the other hand, the SXRD results show that HT1 is more effective in relieving the bulk RS. It is observed that HT1 reduces the RS state in both the aluminium matrix and the silicon network. In addtion, HT2 does not have a significant impact on relaxing the RS as‐built state of the matrix, although it does induce a reduction in the RS magnitudes of the Si phase. It is concluded that the heat treatment stress relieving is effective as long as the Si‐network is not disaggregated.
Connecting Diffraction-Based Strain with Macroscopic Stresses in Laser Powder Bed Fused Ti-6Al-4V
(2020)
The laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) production process often results in large residual stress (RS) in the parts. Nondestructive techniques to determine RS are badly needed. However, a reliable quantification of macro-RS (i.e., stress at the component level) by means of diffraction-based techniques is still a great challenge, because the link between diffraction-based strain and macro-RS is not trivial. In this study, we experimentally determine (by means of in-situ synchrotron radiation diffraction) this link for LPBF Ti-6Al-4V. We compare our results with commonly used models to determine the so-called diffraction elastic constants (DECs). We show that LPBF materials possess different DECs than wrought alloys, simply because their microstructural and mechanical properties are different. We also show that the existing models can be used to calculate DECs only if high accuracy of the RS values is not required. If the peculiarities of the microstructure have to be taken into account (as is the case of additively manufactured materials), a radically new approach is desirable.