Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (5)
Schlagworte
- Microanalysis (5) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
The results of an interlaboratory comparison of energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis of TiN0.84 and ZrN were presented. The microprobe group of the German Physical Society (DPG) and the Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) had initiated the interlaboratory comparison. The primary aim was to test modern EDX systems equipped with ultrathin windows concerning the accuracy and reliability of the analysis of compounds containing light elements. The participants from 23 laboratories performed the analysis at different primary energies, in the standard-less mode as well as on the base of own standards, and considering Ti-K or Ti-L in case of TiN0.84. The results show a slight overestimation of the nitrogen content and a large standard deviation from the mean value. Reasons for the scattering of the results are discussed.
A microfocus X-ray source mounted on the analysis chamber of an SEM was used to excite X-ray fluorescence spectra and to detect chemical elements with concentrations below the detection limit of the electron-excited X-ray spectra conventionally measured with SEM/EDS. An aluminium alloy and a hard material ceramics were analysed as representative examples. It is demonstrated that the combination of the three analytical methods: (1) SEM imaging for surface morphology characterisation; (2) electron-excited X-ray spectroscopy with its high spatial resolution for element analysis of inclusions or precipitates; and (3) X-ray fluorescence for the detection of elements with concentrations below 0.1 mass% considerably improves the performance of SEM/EDX analyses.
Secondary fluorescence is an inevitable effect that has to be taken into account in any algorithm for quantitative electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) as an additional correction. Moreover, secondary fluorescence worsens spatial resolution of EPMA. Secondary fluorescence is excited both by characteristic radiation and by the X-ray continuum. In most cases the correction is small. There are, however, cases, e.g. the determination of low heavy metal concentration in a light matrix, where the contribution of secondary fluorescence exceeds 10% of the measured X-ray line intensity.
For secondary fluorescence correction the measured X-ray line intensity has to be divided by the correction factor (1+I_flchar/I_p +I_flcont/I_p )≈(1+I_flchar/I_p )(1+I_flcont/I_p ) in order to get those intensity I_p, which is excited only by the primary electrons. I_flchar and I_flcont mean the calculated characteristic and continuums fluorescence intensities. In order to get the intensity of fluorescence radiation, the absorption of the exciting radiation in the specimen, the photoionization probability and the self-absorption of the emitted line must be calculated. The critical quantity is the X-ray yield of the exciting atoms in case of fluorescence by characteristic radiation and the bremsstrahlung yield of the specimen in case of continuum fluorescence. In the former case it is reasonable to apply the same physical model to calculate I_flchar and I_p.