Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (24) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Fluorescence (7)
- Spectral correction (6)
- Standard (6)
- Quality assurance (4)
- Emission (3)
- Spectral fluorescence standard (3)
- Traceability (3)
- Calibration tool (2)
- Dye (2)
- Glass (2)
- Method comparison (2)
- Photoluminescence (2)
- Uncertainty (2)
- 13C NMR (1)
- 29Si NMR (1)
- Amphiphiles (1)
- Antibody (1)
- Arsenolipids (1)
- Aspergillus (1)
- Asymmetric catalysis (1)
- Biosynthesis (1)
- Block copolymers (1)
- Boehmite (1)
- CCQM (1)
- CCQM key comparison (1)
- Calibration (1)
- Cationic photocuring (1)
- Cis-ZEN (1)
- Conjugate (1)
- Cycloaliphatic epoxy oligosiloxane (1)
- Depletion kinetics (1)
- ESI-MS/MS (1)
- Emission standards (1)
- Enantioselective Hydrogenation (1)
- Epoxy conversion degree (1)
- Excitation (1)
- Explosive (1)
- Fluorescence intensity (1)
- Fluorescence intensity standards (1)
- Fluorescence standard (1)
- Fluorescence standards (1)
- Fluoreszenzstandards (1)
- Fluorometrie (1)
- Fluorometry (1)
- Folic acid (1)
- Fusarium (1)
- HPLC-ICP-MS/HR-MS (1)
- HRMS (1)
- Hapten immunoassay (1)
- Hr- and Solid State NMR-Spectroscpy (1)
- Hydrogenation (1)
- Instrument performance validation (1)
- Intensity standard (1)
- Key comparision (1)
- Kinetics (1)
- LC-MS/MS (1)
- Liquid standard (1)
- Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (1)
- Mycotoxin (1)
- N-vinyl pyrrolidone (1)
- NMR (1)
- Nanocomposite (1)
- Phase I metabolism (1)
- Powder Diffractometry (1)
- Purity assessment (1)
- Quantum yield (1)
- Radiometrische Terminologie (1)
- Radiometry (1)
- Reaction mechanisms (1)
- Real-time infrared spectroscopy (1)
- Reference material (1)
- Reversible addition/fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) (1)
- Rhizopus (1)
- Rhodium (1)
- Rhodium-Phosphor-Complex (1)
- Rückführbarkeit (1)
- Si-O-C bonds (1)
- Silica-cellulosic composites (1)
- Sol-gel derived silica (1)
- Spectral radiance (1)
- Spectral responsivity (1)
- Spectrofluorometer (1)
- Structure (1)
- Synthesis (1)
- TATP (1)
- Triacetone triperoxide (1)
- Zearalenone (1)
- qNMR (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 6 Materialchemie (3)
- 6.3 Strukturanalytik (3)
- 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien (2)
- 1.7 Organische Spuren- und Lebensmittelanalytik (2)
- 1.8 Umweltanalytik (1)
- 4 Material und Umwelt (1)
- 4.1 Biologische Materialschädigung und Referenzorganismen (1)
- 6.1 Oberflächen- und Dünnschichtanalyse (1)
- 6.6 Physik und chemische Analytik der Polymere (1)
The need for the traceable characterization of fluorescence instruments is emphasized from a chemists point of view, focusing on spectral fluorescence standards for the determination of the wavelength- and polarization-dependent relative spectral responsivity and relative spectral irradiance of fluorescence measuring systems, respectively. In a first step, major sources of error of fluorescence measurements and instrument calibration are revealed to underline the importance of this issue and to illustrate advantages and disadvantages of physical and chemical transfer standards for generation of spectral correction curves. Secondly, examples for sets of traceable chemical emission and excitation standards are shown that cover a broad spectral region and simple procedures for the determination of corrected emission spectra with acceptable uncertainties are presented. With proper consideration of the respective measurement principle and geometry, these dye-based characterization procedures can be not only applied to spectrofluorometers but also to other types of fluorescence measuring systems and even to Raman spectrometers.
The inter-instrument, inter-laboratory, and long-term comparability of fluorescence data requires the correction of the measured emission and excitation spectra for the wavelength- and polarization-dependent spectral irradiance of the excitation channel at the sample position and the spectral responsivity of the emission channel employing procedures that guarantee traceability to the respective primary standards. In this respect the traceability chain of fluorometry is discussed from a radiometrists point of view. This involves, in a first step, the realization of the spectral radiance scale, based on the blackbody radiator and electron storage ring, and the spectral responsivity scale, based on the cryogenic radiometer and their control via key comparisons of the national metrology institutes. In a second step, the characterization including state-of-the art uncertainties of the respective source and detector transfer standards such as tungsten strip lamps, integrating sphere radiators, and trap detectors used to disseminate these radiometric quantities to users of spectroscopic techniques is presented.
Problems associated with the measurement of photoluminescence are briefly reviewed, including relevant instrument parameters affecting these measurements. Procedures for the characterization of relevant instruments are discussed, focusing on spectrofluorometers, and fit-for-purpose methods including suitable standards are recommended. The aim here is to increase the awareness of the importance of reliable instrument characterization and to improve the comparability of measurements of photoluminescence.
With the Calibration Kit Spectral Fluorescence Standards BAM-F001BAM-F005, we developed a simple
tool for the characterization of the relative spectral responsivity and the long-term stability of the emission channel of
fluorescence instruments under routine measurement conditions thereby providing the basis for an improved comparability
of fluorescence measurements and eventually standardization. This first set of traceable fluorescence standards,
which links fluorescence measurements to the spectral radiance scale in the spectral range of 300770 nm and has been optimized for spectrofluorometers, can be employed for different measurement geometries and can be adapted to different fluorescence techniques with proper consideration of the underlying measurement principles.
Under the auspices of the Organic Analysis Working Group (OAWG) of the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM) a key comparison, CCQM K55.b, was coordinated by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) in 2010/2011. Nineteen national measurement institutes and the BIPM participated. Participants were required to assign the mass fraction of aldrin present as the main component in the comparison sample for CCQM-K55.b which consisted of technical grade aldrin obtained from the National Measurement Institute Australia that had been subject to serial recrystallization and drying prior to sub-division into the units supplied for the comparison.
Aldrin was selected to be representative of the performance of a laboratory's measurement capability for the purity assignment of organic compounds of medium structural complexity [molar mass range 300 Da to 500 Da] and low polarity (pKOW < -2) for which related structure impurities can be quantified by capillary gas phase chromatography (GC).
The key comparison reference value (KCRV) for the aldrin content of the material was 950.8 mg/g with a combined standard uncertainty of 0.85 mg/g. The KCRV was assigned by combination of KCRVs assigned by consensus from participant results for each orthogonal impurity class. The relative expanded uncertainties reported by laboratories having results consistent with the KCRV ranged from 0.3% to 0.6% using a mass balance approach and 0.5% to 1% using a qNMR method.
The major analytical challenge posed by the material proved to be the detection and quantification of a significant amount of oligomeric organic material within the sample and most participants relying on a mass balance approach displayed a positive bias relative to the KCRV (overestimation of aldrin content) in excess of 10 mg/g due to not having adequate procedures in place to detect and quantify the non-volatile content–specifically the non-volatile organics content–of the comparison sample.
There was in general excellent agreement between participants in the identification and the quantification of the total and individual related structure impurities, water content and the residual solvent content of the sample.
The comparison demonstrated the utility of 1H NMR as an independent method for quantitative analysis of high purity compounds. In discussion of the participant results it was noted that while several had access to qNMR estimates for the aldrin content that were inconsistent with their mass balance determination they decided to accept the mass balance result and assumed a hidden bias in their NMR data. By contrast, laboratories that placed greater confidence in their qNMR result were able to resolve the discrepancy through additional studies that provided evidence of the presence of non-volatile organic impurity at the requisite level to bring their mass balance and qNMR estimates into agreement.
In the second part of this two-part series on the state-of-the-art comparability of corrected emission spectra, we have extended this assessment to the broader community of fluorescence spectroscopists by involving 12 field laboratories that were randomly selected on the basis of their fluorescence measuring equipment. These laboratories performed a reference material (RM)-based fluorometer calibration with commercially available spectral fluorescence standards following a standard operating procedure that involved routine measurement conditions and the data evaluation software LINKCORR developed and provided by the Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM). This instrument-specific emission correction curve was subsequently used for the determination of the corrected emission spectra of three test dyes, X, QS, and Y, revealing an average accuracy of 6.8% for the corrected emission spectra. This compares well with the relative standard uncertainties of 4.2% for physical standard-based spectral corrections demonstrated in the first part of this study (previous paper in this issue) involving an international group of four expert laboratories. The excellent comparability of the measurements of the field laboratories also demonstrates the effectiveness of RM-based correction procedures.
The development of fluorescence applications in the life and material sciences has proceeded largely without sufficient concern for the measurement uncertainties related to the characterization of fluorescence instruments. In this first part of a two-part series on the state-of-the-art comparability of corrected emission spectra, four National Metrology Institutes active in high-precision steady-state fluorometry performed a first comparison of fluorescence measurement capabilities by evaluating physical transfer standard (PTS)-based and reference material (RM)-based calibration methods. To identify achievable comparability and sources of error in instrument calibration, the emission spectra of three test dyes in the wavelength region from 300 to 770 nm were corrected and compared using both calibration methods. The results, obtained for typical spectrofluorometric (0°/90° transmitting) and colorimetric (45°/0° front-face) measurement geometries, demonstrated a comparability of corrected emission spectra within a relative standard uncertainty of 4.2% for PTS- and 2.4% for RM-based spectral correction when measurements and calibrations were performed under identical conditions. Moreover, the emission spectra of RMs F001 to F005, certified by BAM, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, were confirmed. These RMs were subsequently used for the assessment of the comparability of RM-based corrected emission spectra of field laboratories using common commercial spectrofluorometers and routine measurement conditions in part 2 of this series (subsequent paper in this issue).