Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (1)
- Vortrag (1)
- Forschungsbericht (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (3)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (3)
Schlagworte
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (1)
With increased usage of highly demanded, modern materials on safety
relevant parts (e.g. railway wheel sets, generator shafts, turbine disks, medical
implants, etc.) comprehensive analyses regarding the quality of the material are
requested. This gives a focus to non-destructive methods using ultrasound immersion
tank testing for classifying the degree of purity. Two autonomous standards,
ASTM E588 and SEP 1927, have been established for the definition, execution and
evaluation for this high resolution ultrasonic measurements on steel products.
The propagation of ultrasonic waves and the resulting sound field are strongly
dependent on the acoustical properties of the inspected material and the geometry
of probes and specimen. The definition of the measurement setup and the evaluation
methods appear to differ significantly in the given standards. ASTM E588 and
SEP 1927 prescribe the requirement for surface roughness and probe selection, are
using threshold based methods for cleanliness detection, but differ in computation
for the degree of purity. This has been the motivation for a comparison between
both standards with the main focus on amplitude depth dependency and overall spatial
resolution taking the influence of different material characteristics, geometry of
the specimen and sound fields into account.
A performance comparison between the use of non-focusing and focusing probes
respective to the threshold based detection will be presented in this contribution. In
addition, the usage of complex reconstruction algorithms (e.g. SAFT, echo tomography)
is compared with the traditional approaches of inclusion detection and
estimation of the degree of purity
Increased use of high performance steel (HPS) for demanding applications calls for non-destructive ultrasonic testing methods which is covered by standards like SEP 1927 (1) and ASTM E588 (2). Here, an adaption of standards like increasing sensitivity and resolution of ultrasonic testing may be needed in order to improve determination of steel cleanliness.
Modern requirements on standardization in that field have been evaluated during the INCAFAT project “A novel approach for rating fatigue-initiating inclusions in highly demanding steel” which was funded by the European Commission.
Main results of this research show that an adapted standard should be open to different type of specimen due to the diversity in application. This includes a wide range from bars, rings and plates as well as different inspection sensitivities. An adapted standard should be open to the definition of the volume to be investigated and open to be selected by the user. Furthermore, for enhanced resolution the frequency range should be extended to higher frequencies. The use of focal beam probes shall be mandatory and probes should be selected according to the geometry of the specimen. Therefore, calibration procedures have to be improved significantly to allow proper sizing of indications. Indication height shall be directly transferred into an equivalent disc shaped reflector taking distance amplitude curves as well as signal amplitude distribution and signal travel time into account.
A new standard draft proposal taking all these requirements into account has been filed in the frame of the INCAFAT project and is now on discussion.
A novel approach for rating fatigue-initiating inclusions in highly demanding steel (INCAFAT)
(2018)
INCAFAT project aimed to improve existing fatigue damage models by establishing the most suitable combination of measurement techniques to characterise harmful inclusion populations in highly demanding steels. The different inclusion assessments carried out confirm that, chemical composition, secondary metallurgy and manufacturing route affect content, nature, size and shape of inclusions. According to the FEM model, inclusions produce an alteration of the stress field in their surrounding region, which can promote a fatigue failure. Experimental work on fatigue testing has demonstrated that depending on the stressed direction fatigue failures in highly demanding steels could be produced by different types of inclusions. Fractography analyses confirmed that meso-inclusions harmful in fatigue cannot be rated by standard methods, nor 10 MHz ultrasonic testing (macro) or micro-cleanness assessments. The necessity of rating these meso-inclusions has led to critical evaluation of Extreme Value Analysis according to ASTM E2283-08 and the development of high frequency immersion ultrasonic testing. EVA methodology based on inclusion width can be applied reliably when principal stress is parallel to the rolling direction. On the contrary, if inclusions are testing in the elongated directions its fails. On the other hand, the guidelines and recommendations for high frequency ultrasonic testing have been compiled in a new European standard draft. This method based on focal beam probes and high-resolution devices is able to provide information on meso-inclusion distribution.