Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (3)
Referierte Publikation
- ja (3)
Schlagworte
- Reference materials (3) (entfernen)
A new method has been developed for the measurement of sulfur in gas oils using a high pressure asher (HPA) for sample digestion. This, combined with a calibrated enriched isotopic reference material, and high precision mass spectrometry, makes it a powerful tool for an accurate and precise determination of the sulfur content in fossil fuels. The method described here was one of the methods used in the certification of the candidate reference materials BCR-104R, BCR-671 and BCR-672. Approximately 0.2 g of the gas oil samples were spiked with the spike isotopic reference material IRMM-646, which is enriched in 34S, and combusted in an HPA using nitric acid. The isotopes of sulfur were measured as arsenic monosulfides (AsS+) using a thermal ionization mass spectrometer equipped with a Faraday detector. The total uncertainty of the sulfur content (k = 2) is about 1%. The certified reference materials NIST SRM-2724b and NIST SRM-1619b and BCR-105 were used as part of the method validation work. The mass content of sulfur in BCR-104R was measured to be 1014 µg g-1, BCR-671 has 450 µg g-1 sulfur and BCR-672 shows a sulfur mass content of 201 µg g-1. The sulfur content of the candidate reference materials is homogeneous for the sample size used.
Twelve different samples were analyzed for their water content by the classical oven-drying method and a commercial moisture analyzer. Nominal values have been set by Karl Fischer titration and gravimetry. The decomposition during the drying process of samples containing organic compounds was checked by thermogravimetry coupled with Fourier transform infrared spectrometric and mass spectrometric detection. Summarizing all measurement results, the commercial moisture analyzer demonstrated an average bias for the determination of water contents, which is much smaller than the stated uncertainty and thus is negligible. Compared to the classical oven-drying method, the commercial moisture analyzer shows a smaller bias, more ease in handling and less time consumption per analysis. When validated by a reference procedure like Karl Fischer titration the commercial moisture analyzer is the method of choice for routine analysis.