Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (6)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (1)
- Vortrag (1)
Schlagworte
- Composite cylinders (8) (entfernen)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (1)
Hydraulic pressure testing of composite gas cylinders damages the cylinders, but provides very limited information. For this reason, the Federal Institute of Materials Research and Testing (BAM) demands the assessment of the safety of design types for retest periods of more than three years by employing destructive testing of small samples.
This gives insight in properties not quantified by current standards.
Depending on the cycle fatigue behaviour of the individual design type either cycle tests or slow burst tests are employed. In this paper methods are introduced for a statistical assessment of sample results of both test methods. This includes gathering the average and load cycle burst strength, and the scatter of a sample as well as analysing and plotting them as a pair of values. Each pair of values representing a sample can be assessed approximately regarding its survival rate in service, if the introduced performance charts are employed.
The presentation shows the basics on the graphic comparison of deterministic regulations and probabilistic safety requirements. In doing so, unsafe but approvable areas in the BAM-SPC (sample performance chart) becomes obvious; as the area of not approveable but safe strength properties does.
Finally the semi-porbabilistic approach of GTR#13 (global technical regulation for hydrogen vehicles) is analysed. Relevant figures show again potential of saving material and unsafe areas in case of high scatter at end of life.
Faserverbundwerkstoffe (Komposite) zeigen außergewöhnliche Veränderungen ihrer Eigenschaften in Abhängigkeit von der Betriebsdauer. Daraus leitet sich auch die Notwendigkeit ab, eine Methode zu finden, die in der Lage ist, Festigkeiten und Restfestigkeiten von Komposit-Druckbehältern zu ermitteln. Dies kann mittels Lastwechselprüfung oder in anderen Fällen vorzugsweise mittels der langsamen Berstprüfung erfolgen. Für eine aussagekräftige Beschreibung der Festigkeit bedürfen die Ergebnisse beider Prüfverfahren einer statistischen Auswertung. Aber insbesondere die statistische Auswertung der berstbezogenen Festigkeitseigenschaften unterliegt neben der Frage der Stichprobengröße einer großen Unsicherheit mit enormen Folgen. Dies ist die Frage, welche Verteilungsfunktion der Streuung der Festigkeitseigenschaft konservativ zugrundegelegt werden darf. So ist zu untersuchen, ob die Gaußsche Normalverteilung (NV) die wahre Verteilung richtig beschreibt. Es könnten aber auch andere Funktionen, wie z. B. die Weibull-Verteilung notwendig sein, um eine Überschätzung der Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit bzw. Zuverlässigkeit in dem interessanten Bereich von einem Ausfall pro 104 bis 108 Druckbehältern zu vermeiden.
The current practice of periodic retesting of composite pressure receptacles primarily based on the hydraulic pressure test has to be evaluated as critical.
This is justified by micro damages caused to the specimen by the test
itself and by a lack of informative values. Thus, BAM Federal Institute of Materials Research and Testing uses a new validation approach in the case of retest periods of more than 5 years. It enables the description of the condition of a specific design type series based on destructive tests parallel to operation. With respect to this approach it is explained how the statistical evaluation of sample tests and their extrapolation to end of life or at least to the time of next retesting can be achieved. In addition, it is explained how the reliability limits may be linked to the size and pressure level of the respective composite pressure receptacle. The frame of this safety Approach includes the influence of the maximum working pressure on the safety assessment.
One topic of this approach is the introduction of the working diagram
essential for safety assessments that allows graphical evaluation of load cycle strength by mean value, scatter and survival rate of samples as well as instruction how to use it. For this, it is explained how the number of filling cycles and the reduction of the respective hydraulic residual cycle strength interacts with the newly introduced value of specific filling sensitivity.
Applications by fire brigades expose the composite cylinders to harsh temperature and handling conditions. Standards have been used for certifying composite cylinders, which are designed for transport of dangerous goods and do not reflect service conditions specific to fire brigades. In this paper, the residual safety of a design type (fully wrapped with aluminum and carbon fiber composite) at the end of their service life of 15 yrs is analyzed. One sample underwent hydraulic load cycle (LC) tests, another conventional burst tests, and the third slow burst tests (SBTs). The statistical evaluation and the handling of an unexpected high amount of early failures are shown.
Developers interested in high pressure storage of hydrogen for mobile use increasingly rely on composite cylinders for onboard storage or transport of dangerous goods. Thus, composite materials and systems deserve special consideration. History gives interesting background information important to the understanding of the current situation as to regulations, codes and standards.
Based on this review, origins of different regulations for the storage of hydrogen as dangerous good and as propellant for vehicles will be examined. Both categories started out using steel and sometimes aluminium as cylinder material. With composite materials becoming more common, a new problem emerged: vital input for regulations on composite pressure systems was initially derived from decades of experience with steel cylinders. As a result, both regulatory fields suffer somewhat from this common basis. Only recent developments regarding requirements for composite cylinders have begun to go more and more separate ways. Thus these differences lead to some shortcomings in regulation with respect to composite storage systems.
In principle, in spite of separate development, these deficits are in both applications very much the same: there are uncertainties in the prediction of safe service life, in retesting procedures of composite cylinders and in their intervals. Hence, different aspects of uncertainties and relevant approaches to solutions will be explained.