Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (12) (entfernen)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (12)
Schlagworte
- Gefahrgut (4)
- Gefahrstoff (4)
- Prüfmethode (4)
- Qualitätssicherung (4)
- Ringversuch (4)
- Validierung (4)
- Altitude measurement techniques (2)
- Measurement uncertainties (2)
- Pyrotechnic (2)
- Standardisation (2)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Before fireworks articles are permitted to be placed on the EU market, they need to undergo several tests to demonstrate their functional behavior. The European Directive, 2007/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 on the placing on the market of pyrotechnic articles, defines so-called “essential safety requirements” (ESR, refer to the respective Annex I) which must be met by all pyrotechnic articles. The specific tests and further requirements on function and construction are defined in the downstream harmonized Standards. By application of these Standards, a conformity assumption to the ESR is triggered.
In case of consumer fireworks, the EN 15947 applies. The provisions of Directive 2007/23/EC were implemented into German legislation in October 2009 and numerous conformity assessment procedures (e.g. approval tests) of consumer fireworks have since been performed by the European notified body, BAM.
This paper focuses on consumer fireworks and aims at giving an overview of the achieved results, such as observed failure rates, nonconformities depending on the fireworks types, findings of prohibited Chemicals, etc. A comparison with other published test results is presented as well.
The European Standard series EN 16261 consisting of four parts deals with the testing and assessment of display fireworks in order to satisfy the essential safety requirements of the Directive 2007/23/EC which have to be met before placing these articles on the EU market. The current Version of this Standard provides mortar dimension limits to be used for the assessment of burst heights of spherical Shells, but lacks corresponding provisions for cylindrical shells. The aim of this study was threefold:
1. To check whether the requirements for spherical shells would overlap with the ones
for cylindrical shells,
2. To compare several test procedures for height measurements with each other to
minimize the measurement uncertainty of the effect dimensions, and
3. To evaluate drift distances in order to check whether the current national provisions
on safety distances for Professional fireworks displays need adaption during the
implementation of the new European directive 2013/29/EU on pyrotechnics in German legislation.
For this study, a large number of cylindrical shells was specifically manufactured to guarantee lull control on all relevant constructional aspects. These shells were designed with a smoke tracer and no burst Charge so that they would fall back to the ground in order to investigate their drift distances. Their gross mass corresponded to commercially available display shells, though, consisting of defined inert substances inside the shell. The following Parameters were varied in this study: caliber (75 mm, 100 mm, 150 mm), shell length per caliber (single and double length), lift Charge (hard and soft burst effect), mortar length per caliber (short and long). In total, more than 120 shells were manufactured and tested. Results show a good application of the proposed test procedures regarding the mortar dimensions given in the Standard series for cylindrical shells as well. The following test procedures were part of this study: Radar Doppler System, video grammetric System, universal surveying instruments, and mortar internal pressure measurements. Observed drift distances in relation to the caliber and effect heights are discussed and assessed.
Bei der Bewertung der Verlässlichkeit der im Labor gewonnenen Prüfergebnisse spielen Ringversuche eine entscheidende Rolle. Die Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) unterstützt deshalb den weiteren Ausbau des Ringversuchsprogramms des im Jahr 2007 gegründeten Kompetenzzentrums zur Qualitätssicherung für Prüfungen von Gefahrgütern und Gefahrstoffen auf physikalische Gefahren (Centre for quality assurance for testing of dangerous goods and hazardous substances, CEQAT-DGHS).
Bei allen bisher untersuchten Prüfmethoden besteht ein Verbesserungsbedarf. Die RV müssen daher zunächst auf die Methodenentwicklung, -verbesserung und -validierung abzielen und nicht auf Leistungstests.
Bei der Bewertung der Verlässlichkeit der im Labor gewonnenen Prüfergebnisse spielen Ringversuche eine entscheidende Rolle. Die Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung (BAM) unterstützt deshalb den weiteren Ausbau des Ringversuchsprogramms des im Jahr 2007 gegründeten Kompetenzzentrums zur Qualitätssicherung für Prüfungen von Gefahrgütern und Gefahrstoffen auf physikalische Gefahren (Centre for quality assurance for testing of dangerous goods and hazardous substances, CEQAT-DGHS).
Bei allen bisher untersuchten Prüfmethoden besteht ein Verbesserungsbedarf. Die RV müssen daher zunächst auf die Methodenentwicklung, -verbesserung und -validierung und auf die Bestimmung der Messunsicherheit der jeweiligen Prüfmethode abzielen und nicht auf Leistungstests.
During manufacturing and production processes of pyrotechnic compositions, semi-finished devices and regular pyrotechnic articles an inadvertent reaction or even explosion cannot be fully excluded. The optimization of the design of the involved single work processes can only reduce the risk of such a scenario. For doing so, one must consider the respective properties regarding thermal, mechanical, chemical and electrostatic sensitivities of the compositions being processed. One major key parameter in reducing the risks of such an event is to minimize the consequences, if the likelihood of this event cannot be further reduced.
Minimizing the consequences in cases of unintended explosions during production processes comprises of construction measures regarding buildings (different walls, orientation etc.), increasing safety distances to other buildings, and lowering the maximum net explosive masses and the number of people per room or production process.
Important criteria for defining and setting protection measures are the so-called ‘hazard groups’ (in German ‘Gefahrgruppen’), net explosive masses and the main impacts or hazards (such as blast pressure, heat/radiation and debris).
This paper aims at presenting some approaches used in Germany to minimize the impacts of possible reactions or inadvertent explosions during production processes of pyrotechnic compositions and articles in work spaces. This includes also the determination of safety distances and discussions on reducing thermal impacts.
To minimize hazards during manufacturing and production processes of pyrotechnic compositions, semifinished and regular pyrotechnic articles, related properties of the pyrotechnic compositions must be determined and assessed with focus on those parameters that influence the exothermic reactions and explosion phenomena. Estimated impacts of these reactions as well as the sensitivities towards Initiation by thermal, mechanical or electrostatic stresses are relevant for this assessment.
Since the 50s of the last century so-called ‘Hazard Groups’(in German ‘Gefahrgruppen’) of pyrotechnic compositions were defined, to assess these properties which aim was to set appropriate safety measures for production purposes. This system of Hazard Groups is currently under review to determine if they are still relevant with the latest composition developments in this field and still represent the state of the art.
Several necessary changes and new approaches have already been identified. The new system will contain the following Hazard Groups, all with associated protection measures: 1.1 (and further sub-groups 1.1-1, 1.1-2 and 1.1-3), 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4. This structure is aligned to the international principles for the classification of such substances according to the TDG and GHS regulations. New or updated test and assessment criteria for these (sub-) groups are under development, and comprise of aspects such as sensitivity towards friction, impact, temperature and explosion effects.
This paper aims at giving an overview of this system of hazard Groups in Germany to optimize production safety including pyrotechnic compositions. An overview of this system is given along with example cases for testing and assessment, including a short differentiation of the energetic processes during the reactions.