Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (6) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Explosion (2)
- Overpressure (2)
- Sprengstoffe (2)
- Blasting (1)
- Buried gas pipeline (1)
- CFD simulation (1)
- CFD-Model (1)
- Energetic systems (1)
- Explosives (1)
- Industrial fires (1)
Industrial fire and explosion hazards due to accidents in fuel storage units have gained a
considerable attention in the recent times. Both the regulatory bodies and scientific communities
are heavily concerned about the proper safety measures to avoid such calamities in future. This
paper aims to bring some essentials related to the hazards arose from the recent fuel storage fire
accident occurred in Buncefield, UK (2005), Puerto Rico, USA (2009) and Sitapura, India (2009).
The potential similarities behind occurrence of these accidents are studied. The applicability of
various methods (models) and also computer simulations to estimate the safety distances
according to the international standards for both explosion and fire hazard are verified. The
overpressures caused by the Vapor Cloud Explosion (VCE) and radiation flux emitted by the fire
are considered for respective explosion and fire hazard estimations. The prime focus is placed
on the regulations laid down by the National Fire Protection Agency of the United States and
the European Norms.
Die quantitative Bestimmung toxischer Gase, die bei der Umsetzung von Sprengstoffen entstehen können, ist für alle unter Tage verwendeten Sprengstoffe vorgeschrieben.
In der europaweit harmonisierten Norm DIN EN 13631 Teil 16 wird die Prüfmethode spezifiziert. Die wichtigsten Vorgaben und Anforderungen der Norm und deren Realisierung in der BAM - Prüfmethode werden erläutert. Der Aufbau und die Funktionsweise der BAM – Schwadenkammer, die eingesetzte Beprobungs- und Messtechnik und die Datenauswertung werden beschrieben.
Für die jeweiligen Sprengtypen (ANFO, Emulsionen, gelatinöse Sprengstoffe) werden die gemittelten Gaskonzentrationen für Stickoxide und Kohlenmonoxid diskutiert, die aus den bisher durchgeführten Prüfungen an der BAM resultieren.
Die nunmehr seit mehr als 10 Jahren an der BAM durchgeführten Schwadenprüfungen von gewerblichen Sprengstoffen zeigen, dass die Prüfmethode verlässliche und gut reproduzierbare Ergebnisse liefert. Konstante Prüf- und Umgebungsbedingungen ermöglichen die Vergleichbarkeit der Schwaden-Konzentrationen verschiedener Sprengstoffe.
Der Vergleich mit Werten anderer Prüfeinrichtungen ist jedoch nur eingeschränkt möglich. Insbesondere die Einschlussbedingungen haben einen großen Einfluss auf die Schwadenzusammensetzung. Dies zeigte sich an den alten Prüfergebissen, die noch in der Bergbauversuchstrecke „Tremonia“ oder im späteren Sprengbunker der DMT ermittelt wurden, sowie beim Vergleich mit Messwerten unter Bergbaubedingungen. Zu einem ähnlichen Fazit kam auch ein Ringversuch zwischen den Benannten Stellen, der im Jahr 2009 durchgeführt wurde. Die Messergebnisse der Schwadenprüfung in verschiedenen Versuchseinrichtungen werden vorgestellt und Übereinstimmungen sowie Abweichungen diskutiert.
More than 5 million non-electric detonators are used annually in Germany for blasting operations. The relative usage of non-electric detonators amounts to about 50% of all civil blasting operations in Germany. BAM, as the notified body for explosives in Germany, tests non-electric detonators for the purpose of EU-type approval under the civil explosives directive, but also in the context of general investigations, e.g. when misfiring occurs. BAM has all facilities to test these detonators according to the European standard EN 13763. The presentation will cover the test facilities of BAM and address some issues of delay time accuracy. Several advantages and disadvantages of the non-electric ignition system will be discussed in the context of case investigations, and conclusions for mining operations and the advoidance of misfiring will be drawn.
The explosion and fire incidents with buried gas pipelines are increasing globally e.g. San Bruno (USA, 2010), East Godavari (India, 2014) and Ludwigshafen (Germany, 2014) are only a few to quote. There are a number of parameters involved behind the occurrence of these incidents such as human mistake, intended efforts leading to major or minor leak, explosion due to depressurization, crater formation, spill of gaseous fuel in the nearby regions and pool/jet/crater fires. In continuation to [3] these parameters are investigated for Ludwigshafen incident in the present work. The semi-empirical and advanced CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) based models are utilized to assess the damages caused by the explosion overpressures. Recommendations are also provided on minimum safety distance to be considered for such pipelines to avoid/foresee/mitigate similar hazards in future.
Shock tube systems are non-electric explosive fuses employed in blasting and demolition applications to trigger the detonation of explosive charges. Their working principle is based on the explosive reaction of a fine explosive powder on the tubing's inner surface, generating a shock wave traveling at a velocity of 2,100 m/s along the length of the tube, without destroying it. One of
the key aspects of the manufacturing process of these shock tubes is the size and morphology of the explosive powder grains and their distribution on the inner wall of the tube, in order to propagate the shockwave efficiently and reliably. For the first time, synchrotron X-ray computed tomography has been used to characterize non-destructively the explosive powder grains, typically Al/HMX between 10 and 20 μm in size, in terms of morphology and 3D distribution but also to characterise the presence and location of defects
within the shock tube walls.