Phosphonium-modified layered silicate epoxy resin nanocomposites were evaluated by testing the thermal/thermo-mechanical properties [differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), torsional pendulum, Sharpy toughness], flammability (limiting oxygen index LOI) and fire behavior (cone calorimeter with different irradiations). The morphology of the composites was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The drying conditions of phosphonium-modified layered silicate were varied in order to improve the nanocomposite formation and properties. The results were compared with using a commercial ammonium-modified montmorillonite. Enhanced nanocomposite formation was found for the commercial systems due to the amount of excess surfactant, but this effect was overcompensated through the advanced morphology of the phosphonium-modified systems. Several fire retardancy mechanisms and their specific influence on the different fire properties, such as ignitability, flammability, flame spread, total heat release (fire load), and the production of CO and smoke were discussed comprehensively. The main mechanism of layered silicate is a barrier formation influencing the flame spread in developing fires. Several minor mechanisms are significant, but important fire properties such as flammability or fire load are hardly influenced. Hence combinations with aluminum hydroxide and organo-phosphorus flame retardants were evaluated. The combination with aluminum hydroxide was a promising approach since it shows superposition in properties such as the fire load and only in some properties very little antagonism. The combination with an organo-phosphorus flame retardant disillusions, since it was characterized mainly by antagonism.
Barrier formation and increasing the melt viscosity are addressed as the two main general fire retardancy mechanisms of polymer nanocomposites. They result in specific impacts on fire properties that consequentially cause varying flame retardancy efficiency in different fire tests. The barrier formation retards mainly flame spread (peak of heat release rate) in developing fires, but does not reduce fire load (total heat evolved), ignitability or flammability (limiting oxygen index, UL 94). Furthermore, this flame retardancy effect increases with increasing irradiation and vanishes with decreasing irradiation. The increased melt viscosity prevents dripping, which is beneficial or disadvantageous depending on the fire test used. In some test, it become the dominant influence, transforming self-extinguishing samples into flammable materials or causing wicking. Advantages and the limits are sketched comprehensively for exploiting the main general fire retardancy mechanisms of polymer nanocomposites. It is concluded that barrier formation and changing the melt viscosity in nanocomposites are not sufficient for most applications, but must be accompanied by additional mechanisms in special systems or in combination with other flame retardants.