Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Dehngeschwindigkeit (4)
- Zugversuch (4)
- Steifigkeit (3)
- ISO 6892-1 (2)
- Biegedehnung (1)
- Elastizitätsmodul (1)
- Messlänge (1)
- TENSTAND WP4 Final Report (1)
- TENSTAND WP4 Report (1)
- Tensile testing procedure (1)
- Thermische Ausdehnung (1)
- Tnsile testing (1)
- Warmzugversuch (1)
- Überlagerte Biegung (1)
The authors, Li et al., of the paper entitled “Analysis on the Issues in ISO 6892-1 and TENSTAND WP4 Report Based on Data to Confirm Tests by 21 Laboratories” (J. Test. Eval.
DOI: 10.1520/JTE20150479 (online only)) have expressed views that the authors of this rebuttal believe to be based on fundamental misunderstandings and misinterpretations of the tensile testing standard ISO 6892-1:2009, ISO 6892-1:2016, and its former versions, thus leading to erroneous conclusions. This refutation is intended to clarify the understanding of ISO 6892-1 and to address the misunderstandings and the misinterpretations of the authors of the paper. The present standard ISO 6892-1:2016 has a long history dating back to the 1970s. At that time, the tensile testing procedure was standardized on the National and International scale in parallel. To understand the present standard, the knowledge of the history helps to understand the background of details of the testing procedure implemented today. The history of the tensile testing standard has been discussed extensively during the annual international standardization meeting of ISO committee TC 164 SC1 for the last few years, at which some of the authors of the Li et al. paper attended. The authors continue to disagree with facts that were agreed by the consortium of the European research project TENSTAND and by the present international experts involved in ISO TC 164 SC1. It appears that the principal objective of the authors regarding their present publication was to increase the testing speed during tensile testing. However, the international standardization community has previously declined similar proposals by some of the authors. Many Arguments presented by Li et al. were thus refuted. The conclusions of their paper are misleading and the international standardization community for tensile testing refused to revise the present standard, ISO 6892-1 (2016), according the authors’ proposals.
The authors, Li et al., of the paper entitled “Analysis on the Issues in ISO 6892-1 and
TENSTAND WP4 Report Based on Data to Confirm Tests by 21 Laboratories” (J. Test. Eval.
DOI: 10.1520/JTE20150479 (online only)) have expressed views that the authors of this
rebuttal believe to be based on fundamental misunderstandings and misinterpretations of
the tensile testing standard ISO 6892-1:2009, ISO 6892-1:2016, and its former versions, thus
leading to erroneous conclusions. This refutation is intended to clarify the understanding of
ISO 6892-1 and to address the misunderstandings and the misinterpretations of the authors of the paper. The present standard ISO 6892-1:2016 has a long history dating back to the 1970s. At that time, the tensile testing procedure was standardized on the National and
International scale in parallel. To understand the present standard, the knowledge of the
history helps to understand the background of details of the testing procedure implemented today. The history of the tensile testing standard has been discussed extensively during the
annual international standardization meeting of ISO committee TC 164 SC1 for the last few years, at which some of the authors of the Li et al. paper attended. The authors continue to disagree with facts that were agreed by the consortium of the European
research project TENSTAND and by the present international experts involved in ISO TC 164 SC1. It appears that the principal objective of the authors regarding their present publication was to increase the testing speed during tensile testing. However, the international standardization community has previously declined similar proposals by some of the authors. Many arguments
presented by Li et al. were thus refuted. The conclusions of their paper are misleading and the international standardization community for tensile testing refused to revise the present standard, ISO 6892-1 (2016), according the authors’ proposals.
With the publication of EN ISO 6892-1:2009, the harmonisation of tensile testing at room temperature in Europe was achieved by combining EN 10002-1:2001 with ISO 6892:1998. Essential changes are the introduction of the strain rate and the strain rate control as the significant testing rate or control mode, respectively, referred to as “Method A”. By using this method in the correct way it is guaranteed that in the moment of determination of properties comparable resulting strain rates at the test piece in smaller ranges of specified strain rates are adopted — also if different stiffnesses of the testing equipment are present. This leads especially for strain rate sensitive materials to better comparable results. In this paper it is documented the need for the implementation of method A, methods for the realisation — also by the use of older testing systems — and an example of the comparability of results of the methods for a strain-rate-sensitive-steel.
Mit der Veröffentlichung der DIN EN ISO 6892-1:2009 wurde für den Zugversuch bei Raumtemperatur eine Harmonisierung der in Europa verbindlichen EN 10002-1:2001 mit der ISO 6892:1998 erreicht. Wesentliche Änderungen sind die Einführung der Dehngeschwindigkeit und der Dehngeschwindigkeitsregelung als maßgebliche Prüfgeschwindigkeit bzw. Regelungsart, als Verfahren A bezeichnet. Mit der korrekten Anwendung dieses Verfahrens wird gewährleistet, dass im Moment der Kennwerteermittlung bei enger spezifizierten zulässigen Dehngeschwindigkeitsbereichen vergleichbare resultierende Dehngeschwindigkeiten an der Probe auch bei unterschiedlichen Steifigkeiten der Prüfaufbauten vorliegen. Dieses führt besonders bei dehngeschwindigkeitssensitiven Werkstoffen zu deutlich vergleichbareren Ergebnissen. In diesem Beitrag wird auf die Notwendigkeit der Einführung des Verfahrens A, der möglichen Umsetzungen auch bei Verwendung von älteren Prüfsystemen sowie exemplarisch auf vergleichende Ergebnisse der Verfahren an einem dehngeschwindigkeitssensitivem Stahlwerkstoff eingegangen.
Die im Mai 2011 veröffentlichte Internationale Norm ISO 6892-2 "Metallische Werkstoffe — Zugversuch - Teil 2: Prüfverfahren bei erhöhter Temperatur" ersetzt die Europäische Norm EN 10002-5 und die Internationale Norm ISO 783.
Technische Änderungen/Ergänzungen im Vergleich zu den Vorgängernormen beziehen sich im Wesentlichen auf die Prüfgeschwindigkeiten und die Dehnungsmessung. In Anlehnung an Teil 1 der ISO 6892 (Prüfung bei Raumtemperatur) wird die Dehngeschwindigkeit als maßgebliche Prüfgeschwindigkeit mit eingeengten Bereichen (Verfahren A) empfohlen. Zum Ansetzen des Dehnungsaufnehmers und zur Festlegung der Messlänge sind nun verschiedene Verfahren möglich.
In dem Beitrag wird auch anhand von Beispielen auf mögliche Auswirkungen auf die zu bestimmenden Kennwerte eingegangen.