Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2021 (1) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (1)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (1)
Schlagworte
- Bayesian inferences (1) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (1)
The main challenge in using numerical models as digital twins in real applications for prognosis purposes, such as reliability analysis, is the calibration and validation of the models based on uncertain measurement data. Uncertainties are not limited to the measurement data, but the numerical model itself will not be perfect due to the modelling assumptions.
In this contribution, a probabilistic inference method for model calibration, based on the Bayes’ Theorem, is used to face that issue. Such inference approaches include uncertainties on the data as well as on the model parameters, allowing to compute an a posteriori distribution for the model parameters as well as a noise term reflecting the measured data. However, such probabilistic inference methods require a lot of evaluations of the numerical forward model for different model parameters. An improvement of the efficiency is obtained by replacing the forward model with a reduced model. Model reduction, e.g. the proper generalized decomposition (PGD) method, is a popular concept to decrease the computational effort, where each evaluation of the reduced forward model is a pure less costly function evaluation.
The heterogeneous spatial distribution of material parameters in the forward model is described by a lognormal random field. This allows identifying a variable stiffness over the spatial directions by identifying the random field variables with given measurement data. These changes can e.g. be caused by damage. The lognormal field is approximated as series expansion for the PGD problem.
The derived efficient model identification procedure is shown using a real reinforced prestress demonstrator bridge and stereophotogrammetry measurement data. A digital twin for that demonstrator bridge is build up using a set of measurement data and verified by testing additional measurement data. PGD model error against the FEM model is discussed based on an importance sampling analysis computing the Bayes Factor.