Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (5)
- Sonstiges (2)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (8) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Antibody (8) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 1.8 Umweltanalytik (8) (entfernen)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (5)
Immunoanalytical Techniques, i.e., antibody-based analytical methods, have been used for decades in clinical diagnostics. What makes them attractive for other fields of application is their short time-to-result and high sensitivity. Microplate-based assays such as ELISA have been adopted early in environmental and food analysis. Yet, to make immunoassays even faster, more sensitive, robust, and, most desirable, portable, advanced materials, sometimes developed for other purposes, can be profitably used to achieve these goals. Materials can be novel labels, e.g., chemical or particle labels, such as fluorophores or nanoparticles. Carrier particles, such as magnetic or polymer beads, make it possible to adopt the assays to meso- or microfluidic set-ups and encoding them opens the path to multiplex analysis. Specialty electrodes can enable for higher sensitivity in electrochemical detection. All this broadens the scope of application and lowers effort and cost for analysis at the point-of-need.
In urban waters, a multitude of organic micropollutants, often termed emerging pollutants, has been found over the last decades. Analytical methods suitable for trace analysis are needed that are desirably also fast, inexpensive and, if possible, robust and portable. Immunoanalytical, i.e., antibody-based, methods which are available in a broad range of formats, can be profitably used here to screen for the distribution and to monitor the trends of concentration levels of contaminants of emerging concern in the environment. Some of these formats are single-analyte but high-throughput methods. To use them wisely, indicator substances, sometimes called anthropogenic markers, should be selected and used in screening approaches, i.e., as indicators for contamination and the pre-selection of samples at which to have a closer look by multiplex methods like LC-MS/MS. Other methods are suitable to be performed on portable instrumentation in the field (on-site) or in facilities such as wastewater treatment plants for on-line monitoring of the treatment and elimination process. Furthermore, array technologies have been established that allow for parallel (multiplex) analysis of several analytes of interest.
The microtiter-plate based ELISA (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) is the method of choice for the analysis of a large number of samples [1]. ELISAs are available to monitor for anthropogenic markers such as the antiepileptic carbamazepine, the analgesic diclofenac, the antihistaminic cetirizine, the steroid hormone estrone, the antimicrobial sulfamethoxazole, psychoactive caffeine and cocaine, the priority pollutant bisphenol A, and the bile acid isolithocholic acid. For on-site screening and monitoring, simpler formats, like mix-and-read assays, e.g., the Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay (FPIA) [2] or Lateral-flow Immunoassays (LFIA) [3] are more suitable tools, the latter based on dipsticks or little cassettes, with which users have become very familiar during the COVID-19 pandemic via rapid antigen tests. The suitability of multi-analyte formats such as immunomicroarrays depends on the choice of a signal-producing system that provides small uncertainties and good reproducibility of the measurements. Bead-based (“suspension”) arrays, read out in flow cytometers, are a powerful platform for multiplex assays [4]. Electrochemical formats, run on portable devices, provide additional advantages as no light source is required. They are most promising for stand-alone analysers and biosensors [5].
The speed, low cost and on-site capabilities of these methods allow to gather a lot more data on anthropogenic compounds which enables to quantify inputs, differences in degradation power of elimination processes, dilution phenomena and a more precise image of individual water cycles which is demonstrated by several examples.
The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in December of 2019, led to a worldwide still on-going pandemic. Since then, several so-called waves of SARS-CoV-2 infections, a time period with a high and fast rising number of new infections, have occurred all over the world. Classic surveillance approaches are hardly applicable, and further, non-detected cases cannot be covered by them. Wastewater-based Epidemiology (WBE) was proven to be a reliable tool for the prediction of new SARS-CoV-2 infection waves, due to the discharge of virus particles in fecal shedding of infectious people. Until now, for the monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is used as analytical tool. Even though PCR is a highly sensitive analytical tool, is presents several disadvantages, such as the need for trained personnel, specific technical equipment, as well as a difficult performance. An analytical tool, to which these disadvantaged do not apply, are immunoassays. In this work, a sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), with the immobilization of the capture antibodies on the surface of a Microtiter Plate (MTP), as well as a sandwich Magnetic Bead-Based Assay (MBBA), with immobilization of the capture antibodies on the surface of Magnetic Beads (MBs), targeting the SARS-CoV-2 N-protein, were developed and optimized. Both assay formats were performed with a colorimetric and chemiluminescent detection. The developed assay is composed of the two monoclonal antibodies (mAb) AH2 and DE6 - which was biotinylated in the course of the work - which bind to two different epitops of the antigen N-protein. As tracer, Neutravidin-HRP was used, which binds, through interaction of the Neutravidin with the biotin, to the mAb DE6-Biotin. The assay development and optimization procedure included the investigation of the surface saturation with the mAb AH2, the concentration and dilution of the mAb DE6-Biotin and Neutravidin-HRP, the ideal MBs, the ideal coating as well as dilution buffers, and the colorimetric and chemiluminescent substrates. For the developed and fully optimized colorimetric ELISA, a test midpoint x0 of 388 μg/L, for the chemiluminsecent ELISA of 371 μg/L, for the colorimetric MBBA of 251 μg/L and for the chemiluminescent MBBA of 243 μg/L was obtained. Validation of the colorimetric MBBA was done by measurement of three wastewater samples collected at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Potsdam. Whilst no N-protein could be detected in the samples, by spiking of the wastewater samples with certain concentrations of the N-protein, 10- to 18-times lower concentrations could be back-calculated, which can be attributed to matrix-effects of the wastewater sample. Next to the matrix-effects, also several other reason exist, why no N-protein could be determined in the samples. Because of that, further investigation of the handling, and the measurement of the wastewater samples, as well as the improvement of the assay sensitivity through further optimization steps or exchange of the antibodies, is still necessary.
Analytical methods based on the selectivity of antibodies, often called immunoassays, are a back-bone of clinical laboratory diagnostics. To bring them to the field, i.e., to make immunoanalytical methods portable, hopefully even faster, more sensitive, and robust, advanced materials are re-quired. Materials can be novel labels, e.g., chemical or particle labels, such as fluorophores or na-noparticles. Carrier particles, such as magnetic or polymer beads, make it possible to adopt the as-says to meso- or microfluidic set-ups and encoding them opens the path to multiplex analysis. Spe-cialty electrodes can enable for higher sensitivity in electrochemical detection. Without research into better materials, efforts to bring analysis to the point-of-need will not bear fruit.
Pharmacologically active compounds are often detected in wastewater and surface waters. The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac (DCF) was included in the European watch list of substances that requires its environmental monitoring in the member states. DCF may harmfully influence the ecosystem already at concentrations ≤ 1 μg L−1. The fast and easy quantification of DCF is becoming a subject of global importance. Fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) is a homogeneous mix-and-read method which does not require the immobilization of reagents. FPIA can be performed in one phase within 20–30 min, making it possible to analyse wastewater without any complicated pre-treatment. In this study, new tracermolecules with different structures, linking fluorophores to derivatives of the analyte, were synthesized, three homologous tracers based on DCF, two including a C6 spacer, and one heterologous tracer derived from 5-hydroxy-DCF. The tracer molecules were thoroughly assessed for performance. Regarding sensitivity of the FPIA, the lowest limit of detection reached was 2.0 μg L−1 with a working range up to 870 μg L−1. The method was validated for real wastewater samples against LC-MS/MS as reference method with good agreement of both methods.
A vast number of emerging pollutants is being detected in the environment. Another lingering problem are health-threatening contaminants, such as mycotoxins, that deteriorate food and feed, and the pathogens themselves. Analytical methods, suitable for trace analysis, are needed that are desirably also fast, inexpensive and, if possible, robust and portable. It is set out, how immunoana-lytical, i.e., antibody-based methods, which are elaborated in a broad range of formats, can be profitably used to gain insights on the distribution and concentration trends of the target analytes at the point-of-need.
Protein immobilization for the functionalization of particles is used in various applications, including biosensors, lateral-flow immunoassays (LFIA), bead-based assays, and others. Common methods for the quantification of bound protein are measuring protein in the supernatant before and after coating and calculating the difference. This popular approach has the potential for a significant overestimation of the amount of immobilized protein since layers not directly bound to the surface (soft protein corona) are usually lost during washing and handling. Only the layer directly bound to the surface (hard corona) can be used in subsequent assays. A simplified amino acid analysis method based on acidic hydrolysis and RP-HPLC-FLD of tyrosine and phenylalanine (aromatic amino acid analysis, AAAA) is proposed to directly quantify protein bound to the surface of gold nano- and latex microparticles. The results are compared with indirect methods such as colorimetric protein assays, such as Bradford, bicinchoninic acid (BCA), as well as AAAA of the supernatant. For both particle types, these indirect quantification techniques show a protein overestimation of up to 1700% compared to the direct AAAA measurements. In addition, protein coating on latex particles was performed both passively through adsorption and covalently through EDC/sulfo-NHS chemistry. Our results showed no difference between the immobilization methodologies. This finding suggests that usual protein determination methods are no unambiguous proof of a covalent conjugation on particles or beads.