Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (2)
- Vortrag (2)
Sprache
- Englisch (4)
Schlagworte
- Melamine cyanurate (4) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (2)
Manipulating the melt dripping of thermoplastics makes a fire scenario more or less dangerous. Yet, a detailed understanding of this phenomenon has remained a question mark in studies of the flammability of plastics. In this work, the individual and collective impacts of additives on the dripping behaviour of polyamide 6 (PA6) were studied. A set of materials compounded with melamine cyanurate (MCA) and glass fibre (GF) was investigated. Under UL 94 vertical test conditions, the dripping during first and second ignition was quantified and investigated in detail. The number, size and temperature of the drops were addressed, and the materials and their drops evaluated with respect to such aspects as their averaged molecular weight, thermal decomposition and rheological properties. PA6 with V-2 classification improved to V-0 with the addition of MCA, and achieved HB in the presence of GF. PA6/GF/MCA achieved V-2. Non-flaming drops of PA6/MCA consisted of oligomeric fragments. Flaming drops of PA6/GF showed a more pronounced decomposition of PA6 and an increased GF content. The dripping behaviour of PA6/GF/MCA can be understood as a combination of the influence of both additives. The results showed nicely that dripping under fire is neither a straightforward material property nor a simple additive influence, but the complex response of the material influenced by the interaction and competition of different phenomena.
The multicomponent flame retardant system of melamine polyphosphate (MPP), melamine cyanurate (MC) and aluminum diethylphosphinate (AlPi) is proposed and investigated for thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). The synergy between those additives and the resulting superior fire performance are discussed. Systematically varied sets of flame retarded TPU with various MPP/MC/AlPi ratios were investigated in terms of fire behavior, pyrolysis products and mechanical properties. The total amount of the additives was always 30 wt.-%. Further, the influence of various AlPi concentrations was investigated. The optimal MPP:MC ratio was determined while keeping the amount of AlPi constant. The combination of 8 wt.-% MPP, 12 wt.-% MC and 10 wt.-% is proposed as the most promising halogen free flame retardant formulation for TPU, because it yielded a reduction in PHRR from 2660 kW/m2 (TPU) to 452 kW/m2 and enabled V-0 classification in the UL 94 test. Combinations of MPP and MC as well a high concentration of AlPi are beneficial for the mechanical properties e.g. tensile strength and elongation at break of the formulations and could be a strong competitor to commercial flame retarded TPUs.
Thermoplastic polyurethane - How thespecific two-stage decompositioncontrols its fire behavior
(2018)
Thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPUs) are one of the major classes of thermoplastic elastomers used in the cable and wire industry. Due to their chemical structure, they are considered as linear block copolymers with alternating hard and soft segments. This specific structure is not only responsible for the excellent mechanical properties of TPU like high tensile strength or abrasion resistance, but it also influences the pyrolysis and burning behavior. TPU is a highly flammable polymer which forms liquid pool fires or burning drops which results in intensive flame spread. Because of that, TPU often does not meet the strict requirements for indoor applications given by the cable market.
Under thermal stress, TPU decomposes in a specific way. At first, the hard segments decompose and the material becomes soft and melts. Subsequently, pool fires are formed and melted material burns extensively. There are not many works addressing this problem in detail especially in terms of suitable flame retardant solutions. It is crucial to understand at which stage the flame retardants are working and how they affect the thermal decomposition of TPU. Hence, the focus of this work was put on the identification of the reactions occurring during each stage of TPU decomposition and the contribution of released products to the effective heat of combustion (EHC). Moreover, the detailed analysis of the melt dripping behavior was performed to better understand the influence of the decomposition degree on the viscosity.
The use of melamine cyanurate (MC) in combination with other additives was reported to be a promising flame retardant solution for TPU, especially in cable jacket applications. Hence, the combinations of MC with various flame retardants were used in TPU (Elastollan® 1185A10) and were investigated in terms of fire behavior, flammability, pyrolysis and decomposition products. As flame retardants, common ones were used including aluminum trihydrate (ATH), melamine polyphosphate (MPP), or aluminum diethylphosphinate (AlPi). Moreover, commercial product TPU-FR (Elastollan® 1185A10FHF) was investigated as a reference.
The individual and collective impacts of additives in melt dripping behaviour were studied under UL 94 vertical test conditions. A set of polyamide 6 (PA6) based materials compounded with melamine cyanurate (MCA) – a ˝dripping agent˝ – and glass fibre (GF) – a ˝non-dripping agent˝ - was investigated in detail. Dripping quantification was carried out during first and second ignition. The materials and their drops were investigated with respect to thermal decomposition, melt viscosity, and others properties. PA6 with V-2 classification improves to V-0 when MCA is added; and is worsened to HB in presence of glass fibre. Together, PA6/GF/MCA achieved V-2. The non-flaming drops of PA6/MCA are formed by oligomeric fragments. The flaming drops of PA6/GF contain a high amount of glass fibre. The dripping behaviour of PA6/GF/MCA under fire is a complex response of the specimen, but not explained by an easy superposition of the materials’ properties. The dripping behaviour is influenced by the interaction and concurrence of the different phenomena.