Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (4)
- Vortrag (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (5)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (5)
Schlagworte
- Hot Cracking (5) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (1)
Solidification cracking of metals is a well-researched topic in the field of welding science. A material’s susceptibility to solidification cracking can be tested using numerous different specialized test procedures, one of which is the Modified Varestraint-/Transvarestraint test (MVT). It was developed at BAM in 1982 and is internationally standardised. Over the decades, this test has been extensively used to characterise the solidification cracking resistance of many different materials.
The present study was conducted to further investigate the influences of the standardised MVT testing parameters, as well as the characteristics of evaluation methods on the results. Several different high alloyed martensitic LTT (low transformation temperature) filler materials, CrNi and CrMn type, were used. In previous pilot studies, these alloys have shown a rather distinctive solidification cracking behaviour.
First, the effects of different process parameter sets on the solidification cracking response were measured using the standard approach. Subsequently, μCT scans were performed on the specimens. The results consistently show sub surface cracking, to significant, yet varying extents. Different Primary solidification types were found using WDX-analysis, an aspect that is regarded to be the main difference between the CrNi- and CrMn-type materials and their cracking characteristics.
Results show that when it comes to testing of modern high-performance alloys, one set of standard MVT testing parameters might not be equally suitable for all materials. Also, to properly accommodate different solidification types, sub-surface cracking has to be taken into account.
Earlier work has established that a critical amount of 4043 filler is required to avoid solidification cracking when arc-welding 6060 aluminium, depending upon local strain conditions. For example, when the mushy zone behind the weld pool experiences a tensile strain from combined thermal and shrinkage stresses, the possibility exists for crack initiation. For a greater rate of strain, it has been determined that a greater 4043 dilution (i.e. higher weld metal silicon content) is required to avoid crack initiation. Making use of the Controlled Tensile Weldability (CTW) test and local strain extensometer measurements, a boundary has been established between crack and no-crack conditions for different local strain rates and filler dilutions, holding all other welding parameters constant. Using this established boundary as a line of reference, additional parameters have now been examined and their influence on cracking has been characterized. These parameter influences have included studies of weld travel speed, weld pool contaminants (Fe, O, and H), and grain refiner additions (TiAl3 + Boron). Each parameter has been independently varied and its effect on cracking susceptibility quantified in terms of a critical strain rate required to initiate cracking for a given 4043 filler dilution.
A perspective will be given that outlines important considerations in evaluating and predicting weldability. An examination will be made of the local conditions necessary for solidifications crack initiation and growth in a weld. This will be done in light of two prominent thermo-mechanical approaches involving critical strain and critical strain rate. Critical conditions will be identified based upon values available in the literature. Methods used to measure strain and strain rate will be compared. The interpretation of crack lenght measurements commonly used to quantify weldability will be questioned, based upon our current understanding of the problem. Complications and problem areas needing better definition will be identified and discussed, including strain distribution in the mushy zone, segregation at grain boundaries, effect of impurities, and effect of cooling rate on solidification path. Finally, a suggestion will be made for a new approach to weld development using in-situ strain rate measurements and new composition-strain rate maps that define the boundary between crack an no-crack conditions.
Hot cracks as stress corrosion cracking initiation sites in laser welded corrosion resistant alloys
(2005)
Although hot cracks at weld surfaces of corrosion resistant alloys (CRAs) might provide access to respective aggressive media and thus, might provide the conditions for a local potential and pH drop, the interaction between hot cracking and corrosion phenomena has not been investigated up to the present. This particularly concerns the initiation of stress corrosion cracking inside such crevices.
As a first approach to clarify the influence of hot cracks on corrosion resistance, considering particularly stress corrosion cracking, hot crack afflicted laser welds of three different CRAs have been subjected to a series of different corrosion tests.
Besides the fact that the Drop Evaporation (DE) Test represents a more realistic procedure than standard immersion tests it turned out that hot cracks can obviously represent an initiation site of stress corrosion cracking in the austenitic stainless steel AISI 309 (German No. 1.4828). The susceptibility of such hot crack afflicted laser welds to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) significantly depends on temperature and chloride concentration of the test environment In comparison, the high nitrogen austenitic stainless steel AISI S 34565 (German No. 1.4565) did not exhibit any stress corrosion cracking associated with hot cracking. This material exhibited pitting corrosion and stress corrosion only in the base material. The Alloy 50 (German No. 2.4850), a Nickel based material, was susceptible to pitting corrosion, but showed no tendency towards stress corrosion cracking at all.