Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (2)
- Vortrag (2)
- Posterpräsentation (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (5)
Schlagworte
- Melt dripping (5) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (2)
Thermoplastic polyurethane - How thespecific two-stage decompositioncontrols its fire behavior
(2018)
Thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPUs) are one of the major classes of thermoplastic elastomers used in the cable and wire industry. Due to their chemical structure, they are considered as linear block copolymers with alternating hard and soft segments. This specific structure is not only responsible for the excellent mechanical properties of TPU like high tensile strength or abrasion resistance, but it also influences the pyrolysis and burning behavior. TPU is a highly flammable polymer which forms liquid pool fires or burning drops which results in intensive flame spread. Because of that, TPU often does not meet the strict requirements for indoor applications given by the cable market.
Under thermal stress, TPU decomposes in a specific way. At first, the hard segments decompose and the material becomes soft and melts. Subsequently, pool fires are formed and melted material burns extensively. There are not many works addressing this problem in detail especially in terms of suitable flame retardant solutions. It is crucial to understand at which stage the flame retardants are working and how they affect the thermal decomposition of TPU. Hence, the focus of this work was put on the identification of the reactions occurring during each stage of TPU decomposition and the contribution of released products to the effective heat of combustion (EHC). Moreover, the detailed analysis of the melt dripping behavior was performed to better understand the influence of the decomposition degree on the viscosity.
The use of melamine cyanurate (MC) in combination with other additives was reported to be a promising flame retardant solution for TPU, especially in cable jacket applications. Hence, the combinations of MC with various flame retardants were used in TPU (Elastollan® 1185A10) and were investigated in terms of fire behavior, flammability, pyrolysis and decomposition products. As flame retardants, common ones were used including aluminum trihydrate (ATH), melamine polyphosphate (MPP), or aluminum diethylphosphinate (AlPi). Moreover, commercial product TPU-FR (Elastollan® 1185A10FHF) was investigated as a reference.
After introducing into the activities and competence of BAM in the field of fire science, several aspects of successful and tailored flame retardancy of polyolefins are discussed. The talk gives an overview of the works relevant for developing flame retardant polyolefins performed in the working group flame retardancy of polymers. The hypothesis of conservation of effective heat of combustion is proposed. The role of charring, inert fillers, protection layer, and intumescence is assessed for flame retarded polyolefins. Distinct routes of optimization sketched. Examples of controlling the dripping and melt flow to obtain the desired fire behaviour are discussed. Finally the cable modul for the cone calorimeter is presented.
Since thermoplastics’ melt dripping is connected directly with their ability to make a fire scenario more or less dangerous, it has been investigated in greater detail. However, it has still remained a question mark in the field of the flammability of plastics. Once it was recognized that each polymer has its own dripping characteristics under equal, standardized conditions, efforts were made to better understand the specifics of this phenomenon. Several different polymers were tested under fire in order to study the relations between molecular structure and the dimensions of the drops. In particular, the relationship between the polymer decomposition mechanisms and their drops was investigated. New quantification methods helped to study drop yields from materials upon exposure to fire or heat. Polymers and flame-retarded polymers showed variations in dripping, indicating that this behaviour is a combination of melting and the decomposition of the polymer and additives. From this, the main material characteristics that influence dripping under fire were highlighted: temperature, viscosity and decomposition.
As Polyamide 6 (PA6) is a thermoplastic polymer used in a wide range of products, including electronic devices, interest in enhancing the fire retardancy of this type of polymer is high. Melamine cyanurate (MCA) has been reported to be the most important nitrogen-containing flame retardant used in polyamides, and is especially attractive because it is halogen-free. In addition, glass fibres (GF) are commonly used in PA6 to improve its mechanical properties, mainly for engineering applications. In order to contribute to the scientific discussion on dripping behaviour, this work reports on an experimental investigation of a set of PA6 materials compounded with different amounts of MCA and GF content. In UL 94 conditions, dripping quantifications were carried out during First Ignition (FIG) and Second Ignition (SIG). These flammability tests were recorded with an infrared camera. The thermal decomposition and rheological properties of all of the materials and collected drops were evaluated.
Dripping behaviour under fire is controlled by the polymer, the flame retardant and the reinforcement filler. Pure PA6 achieved a V-2 classification in UL 94 test, PA6/MCA V-0, PA6/GF HB, and the flame-retarded composites are also classified as V-2. In spite of these classifications, dripping behaviour observed during the flammability test was distinct for each type of samples, as described in the paper. As for decomposition, the PA6 drops collected had a starting decomposition temperature lower than pure PA6 (Figure 1.a), indicating partly decomposed PA6. PA6/MCA shows a clear, early decomposition step for MCA in thermogravimetry, which vanishes for the collected PA6/MCA drops, proving the complete decomposition of MCA during the UL 94 test. In PA6, glass fibres acted as inert filler, prolonging the time to dripping, and leading to a constant flaming flow (Figure 1.b) in the samples with high concentrations. When GF and MCA were combined in PA6/GF/MCA, the modes of action of both the GF and the MCA interfered with each other (Figure 1.c). GF reduces the effectiveness of MCA and tends to force its main action into the condensed phase. There the dripping behaviour is well restricted through the formation of thermally stable residues. Rheological properties and scanning electron microscopy images are consistent with these results.
FIGURE 1. Thermal decomposition of samples and drops of: a) PA6, b) PA6/30GF, and c) PA6/20GF/20MCA
An experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of bisphenol A bis(diphenyl phosphate) (BDP) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) on the fire behaviour of bisphenol A polycarbonate/acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (PC/ABS) in the vertical UL 94 scenario is presented. Four PC/ABS blends were discussed, which satisfy different UL 94 classifications due to the competing effects of gasification, charring, flame inhibition and melt flow/dripping. For numerical investigation, the particle finite element method (PFEM) is used. Its capability to model the complex fire behaviour of polymers in the UL 94 is analysed. The materials' properties are characterised, in particular the additives impact on the dripping behaviour during thermal exposure. BDP is an efficient plasticiser; adding PTFE prevents dripping by causing a flow limit. PFEM simulations reproduce the dripping and burning behaviour, in particular the competition between gasification and dripping. The thermal impact of both the burner and the flame is approximated taking into account flame inhibition, charring and effective heat of combustion. PFEM is a promising numerical tool for the investigation of the fire behaviour of polymers, particularly when large deformations are involved. Not only the principal phenomena but also the different UL 94 classifications and the extinction times are well predicted.
Melt flow and dripping of the pyrolysing polymer melt can be both a benefit and a detriment during a fire. In several small-scale fire tests addressing the ignition of a defined specimen with a small ignition source, well-adjusted melt flow and dripping are usually beneficial to pass the test. The presence of flame retardants often changes the melt viscosity crucially. The influence of certain flame retardants on the dripping behaviour of four commercial polymers, poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), polypropylene (PP), polypropylene modified with ethylene-propylene rubber (PP-EP) and polyamide 6 (PA 6), is analysed based on an experimental monitoring of the mass loss due to melt dripping, drop size and drop temperature as a function of the furnace temperature applied to a rod-shaped specimen. Investigating the thermal transition (DSC), thermal and thermo-oxidative decomposition, as well as the viscosity of the polymer and collected drops completes the investigation. Different mechanisms of the flame retardants are associated with their influence on the dripping behaviour in the UL 94 test. Reduction in decomposition temperature and changed viscosity play a major role. A flow limit in flame-retarded PBT, enhanced decomposition of flame-retarded PP and PP-EP and the promotion of dripping in PA 6 are the salient features discussed.