Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2016 (7) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (4)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (1)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (1)
- Posterpräsentation (1)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (7)
Schlagworte
- Gefahrgutverpackungen (7) (entfernen)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (4)
Seitens der Industrie besteht großes Interesse, Polyethylenterephthalat (PET) als Werkstoff für Verpackungen zum Transport von Gefahrgütern einzusetzen, da aufgrund der hohen Festigkeit und Steifigkeit von PET die Wanddicken und somit die Kosten der Verpackungen reduziert werden können. Die Prüfung der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von Polyethylenformstoffen als Werkstoffe von Verpackungen erfolgt mit Labormethoden unter Verwendung einer Standardflüssigkeit als Prüfmedium für die Spannungsrisse auslösende Wirkung auf Polyethylen (PE), wodurch Zeit und Kosten der Prüfungen reduziert werden.
Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, eine Laborprüfmethode zum Vergleich der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von PE und PET auf ihre Anwendbarkeit zu prüfen, wie z.B. den Full Notch Creep Test (FNCT). Es wurde untersucht, ob die Prüfkörper aus PE und PET mit umlaufender Kerbe in dieser durch die chemische Industrie entwickelten und von der BAM konzipierten Apparatur auf der Basis des FNCT zu messbaren Ergebnissen unter Einfluss eines Ölsäureamidethoxylates als Netzmittel bei 50 °C führen.
Die Testergebnisse bestätigten die Eignung des Prüfverfahrens für die acht eingesetzten Formstoffe aus PE. Dieses Prüfverfahren konnte nicht für PET angewandt werden, da die Prüfkörper aufgrund der hohen Festigkeit und Steifigkeit des PET beim Kerbvorgang zerbrachen. Die gleiche Aussage konnte für den Nachweis der der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von Verpackungen, der in der BAM Gefahrgutregel BAM-GGR 015 beschrieben wird, getroffen werden. Die einzige Möglichkeit zum Nachweis der Spannungsrissbeständigkeit von PET besteht in der Durchführung von Stapeldruckprüfungen.
The International Dangerous Goods Regulations prescribe the immersion under water method (“bubble test”) as standard method for the leakproofness test of dangerous goods packagings. But this test procedure acts as a test method for leak localisation, not for quantitative leakage rates measurement. Additionally, the sensitivity in detecting leaks of small diameters is restricted, depending on the test liquid and the test pressure. The bubble test is not suitable for a comparison with quantitative limit leakage rates based on realistic transport conditions. This is especially important when estimating the risk of the formation of an explosive atmosphere during the intercontinental carriage of dangerous goods packagings in freight containers. To compare measured leakage rates with limit leakage rates, a quantitative leak testing procedure is required. Therefore a new approach for dangerous goods packagings is implemented: The pressure technique by accumulation using Helium as a tracer gas. This work presents the test equipment necessary for the quantitative measurement of Helium leakage rates through closures of different kinds of dangerous goods packagings. The essential steps to achieve good repeatable results are: A controlled Helium filling process to reach a defined test pressure in the test sample, a sufficient homogenisation of the Helium-air-mixture inside the test sample and the ensuring of a constant pressure level of the test sample during the test. The Helium loss rate of the accumulation chamber has to be measured separately to receive a correction factor for the measured leakage rates. Different constructional measures are introduced to prevent a disturbing influence of the Helium leakage rate of the filling valves on the measurement results. Methods to estimate the disturbing effect of Helium permeation through permeable parts of the test sample are also presented. As a supporting method for the experimental investigations the Helium sniffer test can be applied. This practical application-oriented advice can enable other users to establish a pressure technique by accumulation for their own technical field.
Abstract. The International Dangerous Goods Regulations prescribe the immersion under water method (“bubble test”) as standard method for the leakproofness test of dangerous goods packagings. But this test procedure acts as a test method for leak localisation, not for quantitative leakage rates measurement. Additionally, the sensitivity in detecting leaks of small diameters is restricted, depending on the test liquid and the test pressure. The bubble test is not suitable for a comparison with quantitative limit leakage rates based on realistic transport conditions. This is especially important when estimating the risk of the formation of an explosive atmosphere during the intercontinental carriage of dangerous goods packagings in freight containers.
To compare measured leakage rates with limit leakage rates, a quantitative leak testing procedure is required. Therefore a new approach for dangerous goods packagings is implemented: The pressure technique by accumulation using Helium as a tracer gas.
This work presents the test equipment necessary for the quantitative measurement of Helium leakage rates through closures of different kinds of dangerous goods packagings. The essential steps to achieve good repeatable results are: A controlled Helium filling process to reach a defined test pressure in the test sample, a sufficient homogenisation of the Helium-air-mixture inside the test sample and the ensuring of a constant pressure level of the test sample during the test. The Helium loss rate of the accumulation chamber has to be measured separately to receive a correction factor for the measured leakage rates. Different constructional measures are introduced to prevent a disturbing influence of the Helium leakage rate of the filling valves on the measurement results. Methods to estimate the disturbing effect of Helium permeation through permeable parts of the test sample are also presented. As a supporting method for the experimental investigations the Helium sniffer test can be applied.
This practical application-oriented advice can enable other users to establish a pressure technique by accumulation for their own technical field.
The International Dangerous Goods Regulations prescribe the immersion under water method (“bubble test”) as standard method for the leakproofness test of dangerous goods packagings. But this test procedure acts as a test method for leak localisation, not for quantitative leakage rates measurement. Additionally, the sensitivity in detecting leaks of small diameters is restricted, depending on the test liquid and the test pressure. The bubble test is not suitable for a comparison with quantitative limit leakage rates based on realistic transport conditions. This is especially important when estimating the risk of the formation of an explosive atmosphere during the intercontinental carriage of dangerous goods packagings in freight containers.
To compare measured leakage rates with limit leakage rates, a quantitative leak testing procedure is required. Therefore a new approach for dangerous goods packagings is implemented: The pressure technique by accumulation using Helium as a tracer gas.
This work presents the test equipment necessary for the quantitative measurement of Helium leakage rates through closures of different kinds of dangerous goods packagings. The essential steps to achieve good repeatable results are: A controlled Helium filling process to reach a defined test pressure in the test sample, a sufficient homogenisation of the Helium-air-mixture inside the test sample and the ensuring of a constant pressure level of the test sample during the test. The Helium loss rate of the accumulation chamber has to be measured separately to receive a correction factor for the measured leakage rates. Different constructional measures are introduced to prevent a disturbing influence of the Helium leakage rate of the filling valves on the measurement results. Methods to estimate the disturbing effect of Helium permeation through permeable parts of the test sample are also presented. As a supporting method for the experimental investigations the Helium sniffer test can be applied. This practical application-oriented advice can enable other users to establish a pressure technique by accumulation for their own technical field.
Abstract: The dangerous goods regulations UN/ADR 6.1.5.5.4 a) prescribe a maximum filling degree for determining the test pressure for the hydraulic pressure test by real measurements. The assumption is that the maximum filling degree of the liquid phase is the worst case concerning the gauge pressure. Therefore the main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the filling degree on the gauge pressure.
Gauge pressure measurements and calculations for different substances were carried out at different filling degrees for a steel drum and a steel jerrican (heating-up from 15 °C to 55 °C).
The assumption that the maximum filling degree is the most critical is only valid for relatively rigid packagings: If the relative expansion of the packaging is smaller than the volume increase of the liquid phase due to heating-up, the gauge pressure increases with increasing filling degree.
But the opposite is true for relatively flexible packagings: If the relative expansion of the packaging exceeds the relative volume expansion of the liquid, the gauge pressure increases for decreasing filling degrees. The current regulations for the hydraulic test pressure determination at a maximum filing degree do not lead to the intended safety level. For a lower level than the maximum filling degree, the prescribed safety factor of 1.5 is not respected. Under transport conditions it is possible that the inner gauge pressure exceeds the test pressure. This can result in a failure of the packaging. There is a need to reconsider the regulations.