Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2016 (5) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (2)
- Buchkapitel (1)
- Vortrag (1)
- Posterpräsentation (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (5)
Schlagworte
- chemical sensing (2)
- nanoprobes (2)
- upconversion (2)
- Biosensor (1)
- DNA sensor (1)
- Enzyme sensor (1)
- FRET system (1)
- Fluorescence (1)
- Imaging (1)
- Immunoassay (1)
- Luminescent probes (1)
- Nanosensor (1)
- Optical sensor (1)
- Temperature sensor (1)
- pH sensing (1)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (1)
Biosensors, as defined by Pure and Applied Chemistry, are ‘chemical sensors in which the recognition System utilizes a biochemical mechanism. The biological recognition system translates information from the biochemical domain, usually an analyte concentration, into a chemical or physical output signal with a defined sensitivity’.(1) It is also appointed that chemical or biological sensors contain two basic components connected in series: a chemical or biomolecular recognition System (receptor) and a physicochemical transducer. According to this prerequisite, this overlook is confined to sensor devices that combine a biomolecular recognition element with an optical signal transducer. Homogeneous or intracellular assays using fluorescent molecular probes or nanoparticles are not considered, although they are frequently termed as molecular sensors or nanosensors in the literature.
Fluorescence-based biosensors are generalized as those devices that derive an analytical signal from a photoluminescent (either fluorescence or phosphorescence) emission process. Chemi- or bioluminescent detection systems are only briefly discussed in this review.
Biosensors are used for a wide variety of tasks, including detection of compounds of biomedical, environmental or defense interest; on-line monitoring for process control; quality control of foodstuffs; selective detection of compounds undergoing a chemical separation; and screening of drug compounds. Advantages of such devices include high selectivity, rapid response times, reusability, amenability to remote analysis, and immunity to electrical interferences. The selective nature of complexation between biomolecule and analyte and the small size of sensor devices can be combined with advanced detection techiques such as total internal reflection (TIR) spectroscopy. This results in an ability to measure analytes in complex matrices with unsurpassed sensitivity. Such samples may include highly scattering components such as milk or whole blood,(11) or relatively inaccessible locations such as groundwater wells, or even intracellular environments. The key limitation of such devices mainly centers on the poor stability of biological compounds, which can lead to a substantial drift in instrumental response over time. The so-called Cambridge Definition appoints another characteristic property of sensors. Therein, they are defined as ‘miniaturized devices which can deliver real-time and on-line information on the presence of specific compounds or ions in even complex samples’. Accordingly, a sensor is expected to respond reversibly and continuously. With the exception of some enzymatic sensors, these conditions are not fulfilled in case of most biosensors. Particularly, in devices where immunological reagents or DNA are used as recognition elements, they show a lack of reversibility and operate only as a ‘one-shot’ screen, without the potential for continuous, quantitative analysis. Nevertheless, the designations immunosensors or DNA sensors became accepted for such analytical or diagnostic tools.
A strongly fluorescent organic semiconducting polymer doped with a highly
temperature dependent fluorescent europium(III) complex is converted into a
nanosized material that is capable of optically sensing temperature (T) in the
range from 0 to 50 °C via two-photon excitation at 720 nm. The nanosensors
are prepared from a blue-fluorescent polyfluorene that acts as both a lightharvesting
antenna (to capture two-photon energy) and an energy donor in a
fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) system. The photonic energy
absorbed by the polymer is transferred to the T-sensitive red-luminescent
europium complex contained in the nanoparticles. The close spatial proximity
of the donor and the acceptor warrants efficient FRET. A poly(ethylene glycol)-
co-poly(propylene oxide) block copolymer is also added to render the particles
biocompatible. It is shown that T can be calculated from a) the intensity of
the luminescence of the europium complex, b) the ratio of the intensities of
the red and blue luminescence, or c) the T-dependent luminescence lifetime
of the Eu(III) complex.
Lanthanide-doped photon upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) exhibit many advantages compared to Stokes-shifted luminescent probes (organic dyes, quantum dots). Due to the upconversion process, the limitations of photobleaching, autofluorescence and low penetration depths in tissue shown by classical fluorescent probes are avoided. This makes UCNPs particularly useful for applications in complex biological samples. Sensing of intracellular pH is of particular interest in biomedical research since structure and function of biomolecules strongly depend on the concentration of protons in their environment.
Lanthanide-doped photon upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) exhibit many advantages compared to conventional Stokes-shifted luminescent probes such as organic dyes and quantum dots. Due to the upconversion (UC) process, which describes the conversion of NIR light into shorter wavelength radiation, the limitations of photobleaching, autofluorescence and low penetration depths in tissue shown by classical fluorescent probes absorbing in the UV/vis range are avoided. This makes UCNPs particularly useful for applications in complex samples occurring in bioanalysis, biomedicine and imaging.
Sensing of intracellular pH is of particular interest in biomedical research since structure and function of biomolecules strongly depend on the concentration of protons in their environment. We described previously a UCNP nanosensor for pH based on a resonance energy transfer from hexagonal nanocrystals of NaYF4: Yb3+,Er3+ to a pH-sensitive fluorophore (pHrodoTM Red).[1] The nanocrystals were coated with a thin shell of aminosilane with several nanometer layer thickness for coupling of the pH indicator.
In this contribution we present a new generation of UC nanoprobes that are coated with a layer of highly branched polyethylenimine (PEI). The PEI coating enables a higher coupling of indicator molecules on the particle surface, better signal to reference ratios in ratiometric readout and an improved cellular uptake compared to the aminosilane coated particles due to a more positive zeta potential. Again, pHrodoTM Red is used as pH indicator, sensitized by the 550 nm emission of the UCNPs. The nanoprobes are calibrated by ratiometric dual wavelength readout at 550 nm (reference signal) and 590 nm (sensor signal) and visualized using a scanning confocal fluorescence microscope with 980 nm excitation wavelength. We studied the cellular uptake efficacy of the nanoprobes and determined to which type of compartment, lysosomes, endosomes or cytosol, the probes are targeted to by measuring the pH of their microenvironment. An in situ control was performed in live cells by a treatment with nigericin, whereby the pH of all intracellular compartments is set at extracellular level. Our results suggest that the PEI coating facilitated endosomal escape of the nanoprobes.
Fluorescence imaging microscopy is an essential tool in biomedical research. Meanwhile, various fluorescent probes are available for the staining of cells, cell membranes, and organelles. Though, to monitor intracellular processes and dysfunctions, probes that respond to ubiquitous chemical parameters determining the cellular function such as pH, pO2, and Ca2+ are required. This review is focused on the progress in the design, fabrication, and application of photoluminescent nanoprobes for sensing and imaging of pH in living cells. The advantages of using nanoprobes carrying fluorescent pHindicators compared to single molecule probes are discussed as well as their limitations due to the mostly lysosomal uptake by cells. Particular attention is paid to ratiometric dual wavelength nanosensors that enable intrinsic referenced measurements. Referencing and proper calibration procedures are basic prerequisites to carry out reliable quantitative pH determinations in complex samples such as living cells. A variety of examples will be presented that highlight the diverseness of nanocarrier materials (polymers, micelles, silica, quantum dots, carbon dots, gold, photon upconversion nanocrystals, or bacteriophages), fluorescent pH indicators for the weak acidic range, and referenced sensing mechanisms, that have been applied intracellularly up to now.