Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (7) (entfernen)
Sprache
- Englisch (7)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (7) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- CCQM (7) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (7)
CCQM has established a framework of comparisons to demonstrate the international comparability of chemical measurements. The key point is the establishment of comparable measurements, with traceability to internationally or nationally stated references.
Originally initiated by Dr Martin P Seah, NPL, the Surface Analysis Working Group (SAWG) has been formally founded in 2003. The following terms of reference were presented to CCQM in April 2002. CCQM ratified the group as a full working group of CCQM in April 2003 with these terms of reference:
- to develop pilot studies and carry out key comparisons of national measurement standards for surface and micro/nano-analysis;
- to assist in identifying and establishing inter-laboratory work to improve the traceability of surface and micro/nano-analysis;
- to establish and update a work plan to be adopted by CCQM;
- to discuss and review the scope of the working group and to liase with other working groups related to nanotechnology.
Following the 2016 meeting, the Key Comparison K-129 "Measurement of atomic fractions in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Films" lead by KRISS and the Key Comparison K-136 on "BET specific surface area of nanoporous Al2O3" lead by UNIIM&BAM have been finished in 2016.
The 15th meeting of SAWG will focus on
- survey on CMC claim submitted with reference to K-129 and K-136.
- the overall and SAWG specific aspects of the CCQM Strategy process,
- a joint meeting with the Inorganic Working Group addressing number concentrations of nano particles,
- discussion of future comparisons.
High purity materials can serve as a realisation of the Système International d’Unitès (SI) unit amount of substance for the specific element. Solutions prepared from such high purity materials using gravimetric preparation and the concept of molar mass are used as calibration solutions in many fields of analytical chemistry. Calibration solutions prepared this way provide the traceability to the SI and are the metrological basis in elemental analysis.
The preparation and characterization of such primary pure substances, representing the realisation of the SI unit amount of substance, is undertaken only by a small number of National Metrology Institutes (NMI) and Designated Institutes (DI).
Many other NMIs and DIs, however, prepare elemental calibration solutions as calibrants for their measurement services, such as the certification of matrix Reference Materials or the provision of reference values for Proficiency Testing schemes. The elemental calibration solutions used for this purpose are not a direct service to customers, such as preparing secondary calibration solutions, but provide the source of traceability for the other services. Hence, it is necessary for the NMI or DI to obtain data on the purity of the pure metals or other materials used to prepare the solutions with measurement uncertainties meeting the needs of the above described services. This is commonly undertaken as a “fit for purpose” assessment, appropriate for the uncertainty requirement of the service provided to customers.
As a consequence, total purity measurements are a long-term strategy of CCQM-IAWG. Several studies were conducted (CCQM-P107, CCQM-K72 and CCQM-P149) on the measurement of the purity of zinc. From these studies, several conclusions can be drawn for the purity assessment of a pure (metallic) element. These conclusions will be put together in this document in order to assist all NMIs/DIs in performing a purity assessment, whenever needed.
Shortly after founding the CCQM in 1993, the first key comparison (CCQM-K2) about the determination of Cd and Pb content in river water was hosted by IRMM. It has been clear from the beginning that for the determination of an element mass fraction in a matrix, accurate reference solutions would be the key point for a metrologically sound analysis. Triggered by the not entirely satisfactory results it was decided to investigate the basis of all measurements: the reference solutions. Thus in 1999, CCQM-K8, hosted by EMPA/LNE, started the tedious but indispensable work on elemental solutions standards.
Additionally, PTB, BAM and Merck KGaA initiated a project to establish a traceability system for inorganic analysis based on accurate monoelemental solutions. Within this unique approach ten high purity reference materials were fully characterized, and solutions were prepared gravimetrically thereof. These materials (forming the primary standards of elemental analysis) are available for NMIs/DIs from BAM.
CCQM-P46 (Cu, Mg, Rh) demonstrated the actuality of the topic and the challenges to prepare elemental solutions for every element. The accurate preparation and use of monoelemental solutions is consequently reflected in the recurrent conduct of (key) comparisons: CCQM-P149 (purity of zinc), CCQM-K87 (Co, Cr, Pb), and the current CCQM-K143/P181 (Cu solutions), to name only a few in a long series.
Is it necessary to put so much effort into the preparation of reference solutions? It clearly is! An example outside the world of academia: Recently, EDQM*, PTB, BAM and JRC have developed monoelemental reference standards traceable to the SI for toxic elements in support of the chapters of the European Pharmacopoeia, related to the analysis of elemental impurities in medicinal products. A new ICP OES method has been established allowing the comparison of two 1 g/kg mercury solutions with an outstandingly small uncertainty of Urel(w(Hg)) = 0.16 %. However, this technical progress would not have been possible without the ongoing effort of the metrological community within 25 years of research in the field of high accuracy monoelemental solutions.
* EDQM: European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare