Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2021 (1)
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (1) (entfernen)
Sprache
- Englisch (1)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (1) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Bioanalytics (1) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- VP Vizepräsident (1)
- VP.1 eScience (1)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (1)
Metaproteomics has substantially grown over the past years and supplements other omics approaches by bringing valuable functional information, enabling genotype- phenotype linkages and connections to metabolic outputs. Currently, a wide variety of metaproteomic workflows is available, yet their impact on the results remains to be thoroughly assessed.
Here, we carried out the first community-driven, multi-lab comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation (CAMPI) study. Based on well-established workflows, we evaluated the influence of sample preparation, mass spectrometry acquisition, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, lab-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample.
Although bioinformatic pipelines contributed to variability in peptide identification, wet-lab workflows were the most important source of differences between analyses. Overall, these peptide-level differences largely disappeared at the protein group level. Differences were observed between peptide- and protein-centric approaches for the predicted community composition but similar functional profiles were found across workflows.
The CAMPI findings demonstrate the robustness of current metaproteomics research and provide a perspective for future benchmarking studies.