Zitieren Sie bitte immer diesen URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-463325
Assessing and Treating Risks in Mechanised NDT: A Human Factors Study
- Reliability of NDT is affected by human factors, which have thus far received the least amount of attention in the reliability assessments. With increased use of automation, in terms of mechanised testing (automation-assisted inspection and the corresponding evaluation of data), higher reliability standards are believed to have been achieved. However, human inspectors, and thus human factors, still play an important role throughout this process and the risks involved in this application are unknown. The aim of this study was to explore for the first time the risks associated with mechanised NDT and find ways of mitigating their effects on the inspection performance. Hence, the objectives were to identify and Analyse potential risks in mechanised NDT and devise measures against them. To address those objectives, a risk assessment in form of a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) was conducted. This analysis revealed potential for failure during both the acquisition and evaluationReliability of NDT is affected by human factors, which have thus far received the least amount of attention in the reliability assessments. With increased use of automation, in terms of mechanised testing (automation-assisted inspection and the corresponding evaluation of data), higher reliability standards are believed to have been achieved. However, human inspectors, and thus human factors, still play an important role throughout this process and the risks involved in this application are unknown. The aim of this study was to explore for the first time the risks associated with mechanised NDT and find ways of mitigating their effects on the inspection performance. Hence, the objectives were to identify and Analyse potential risks in mechanised NDT and devise measures against them. To address those objectives, a risk assessment in form of a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) was conducted. This analysis revealed potential for failure during both the acquisition and evaluation of NDT data that could be assigned to human, technology, and organisation. Since the existing preventive measures were judged to be insufficient to defend the system from identified failures, new preventive measures were suggested.…
Autor*innen: | Marija Bertovic |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
Veröffentlichungsform: | Graue Literatur |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes (Englisch): | ZfP-Zeitung |
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung: | 2018 |
Organisationseinheit der BAM: | 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung |
8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung / 8.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere | |
Veröffentlichende Institution: | Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) |
Herausgeber (Institution): | Österreichische Gesellschaft für Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (ÖGfZP) |
Verlag: | Deutsche Gesellschaft für Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (DGZfP) |
Verlagsort: | Berlin |
Ausgabe/Heft: | 161 |
Erste Seite: | 52 |
Letzte Seite: | 62 |
DDC-Klassifikation: | Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / Chemie / Analytische Chemie |
Freie Schlagwörter: | FMEA; Human error; Human factors; NDT; Reliability; Risk assessment |
Themenfelder/Aktivitätsfelder der BAM: | Chemie und Prozesstechnik |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-463325 |
ISSN: | 1616-069X |
Verfügbarkeit des Dokuments: | Datei für die Öffentlichkeit verfügbar ("Open Access") |
Lizenz (Deutsch): | Creative Commons - CC BY-ND - Namensnennung - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International |
Datum der Freischaltung: | 24.10.2018 |
Referierte Publikation: | Nein |
Beteiligte Körperschaft: | Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (SGZP) |
Schriftenreihen ohne Nummerierung: | Wissenschaftliche Artikel der BAM |