• Treffer 1 von 0
Zurück zur Trefferliste

OECD-WPMN sponsorship programme dossiers - a review of the results for particle size

  • The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) established the Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials (WPMN) in 2006. The OECD-WPMN initiated the "Sponsorship Programme for the Testing of Manufactured Nanomaterials", where a defined set of manufactured nanomaterials is tested for their physical/chemical properties, their toxicological potential and their environmental fade. The results of this program have been declassified in June 2015. Having a big set of independent measurements for one endpoint/measurand, has the advantage of really independent comparision of methods. It is surprising what these few data sets already delivered. Nevertheless the amount of data in the OECD-dossiers is still not enough. While we have a lot of data for titanium dioxide, we have only one data set for zinc oxide and very weak data sets for silver nanoparticles. This limits the useablility of the data sets. Regarding the quality of the data, we have seen a very good agreement ofThe Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) established the Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials (WPMN) in 2006. The OECD-WPMN initiated the "Sponsorship Programme for the Testing of Manufactured Nanomaterials", where a defined set of manufactured nanomaterials is tested for their physical/chemical properties, their toxicological potential and their environmental fade. The results of this program have been declassified in June 2015. Having a big set of independent measurements for one endpoint/measurand, has the advantage of really independent comparision of methods. It is surprising what these few data sets already delivered. Nevertheless the amount of data in the OECD-dossiers is still not enough. While we have a lot of data for titanium dioxide, we have only one data set for zinc oxide and very weak data sets for silver nanoparticles. This limits the useablility of the data sets. Regarding the quality of the data, we have seen a very good agreement of TEM and SMPS. This leads to the advice that we should have results for these two methods for each nanomaterial in the sponsorship programme. Another outcome of this draft review is, that currently we cannot compare measurements of agglomerates. This also prohibits the use of DLS as a standard method for size determination.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • EAC2016.pdf
    eng

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Anzahl der Zugriffe auf dieses Dokument
Metadaten
Autor*innen:Harald Bresch
Dokumenttyp:Posterpräsentation
Veröffentlichungsform:Präsentation
Sprache:Englisch
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung:2016
DDC-Klassifikation:Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / Chemie / Analytische Chemie
Freie Schlagwörter:Nano; Nanomaterials; Nanoparticle; Nanopartikel; OECD
Veranstaltung:European Aerosol Conference
Veranstaltungsort:Tours, France
Beginndatum der Veranstaltung:05.09.2016
Enddatum der Veranstaltung:09.09.2016
Verfügbarkeit des Dokuments:Datei im Netzwerk der BAM verfügbar ("Closed Access")
Datum der Freischaltung:05.12.2016
Referierte Publikation:Nein
Einverstanden
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.