• Treffer 7 von 41
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Quantitative surface chemical analysis of stainless steel 1.4301 using Surface Science Instruments XPS spectrometers: report on an interlaboratory comparison

  • Results of an interlaboratory comparison of XPS data obtained with stainless steel are presented. Only one photoelectron spectrometer model was used. The stainless-steel sample surfaces were analysed in different states by XPS: as received, after sputtering to I(C 1s)/I(Fe 2p3/2) 0.025 and after removing a chromium-enriched oxide layer following a certain protocol. The Fe, Cr and Ni elemental concentrations were evaluated from the respective XPS data submitted by the participants of the interlaboratory test experiment. Total means, repeat standard deviations (sr) and reproducibility standard deviations (sR) are presented. The best reproducibility standard deviations were obtained for the XPS analysis after removal of a chromium-enriched oxide layer and quantification of the XPS intensities without taking the contamination elements of carbon and oxygen into account. The absolute reproducibility standard deviation of the elemental concentrations in that case is as small as 1.1-1.5 at.%.Results of an interlaboratory comparison of XPS data obtained with stainless steel are presented. Only one photoelectron spectrometer model was used. The stainless-steel sample surfaces were analysed in different states by XPS: as received, after sputtering to I(C 1s)/I(Fe 2p3/2) 0.025 and after removing a chromium-enriched oxide layer following a certain protocol. The Fe, Cr and Ni elemental concentrations were evaluated from the respective XPS data submitted by the participants of the interlaboratory test experiment. Total means, repeat standard deviations (sr) and reproducibility standard deviations (sR) are presented. The best reproducibility standard deviations were obtained for the XPS analysis after removal of a chromium-enriched oxide layer and quantification of the XPS intensities without taking the contamination elements of carbon and oxygen into account. The absolute reproducibility standard deviation of the elemental concentrations in that case is as small as 1.1-1.5 at.%. This gives 2%, 6% and 16% for the relative reproducibility standard deviation of the concentrations of iron, chromium and nickel, respectively. The total means of the iron, chromium and nickel concentrations finally obtained agree within 2sR with bulk values determined by wavelength-dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Comparison to an earlier interlaboratory test experiment shows that using only one model of photoelectron spectrometer reduces the reproducibility standard deviations efficiently. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Anzahl der Zugriffe auf dieses Dokument
Metadaten
Autor*innen:Thomas Gross, Wolfgang UngerORCiD, J. Patscheider
Dokumenttyp:Zeitschriftenartikel
Veröffentlichungsform:Verlagsliteratur
Sprache:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes (Englisch):Surface and interface analysis
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung:2002
Verlag:Wiley
Verlagsort:Chichester
Jahrgang/Band:33
Ausgabe/Heft:5
Erste Seite:426
Letzte Seite:432
Freie Schlagwörter:ESCA; Interlaboratory comparison; Quantitative surface chemical analysis; Stainless steel; XPS
DOI:10.1002/sia.1229
ISSN:0142-2421
ISSN:1096-9918
Verfügbarkeit des Dokuments:Physisches Exemplar in der Bibliothek der BAM vorhanden ("Hardcopy Access")
Bibliotheksstandort:Sonderstandort: Publica-Schrank
Bibliotheksstandort:ZS 53
Datum der Freischaltung:19.02.2016
Referierte Publikation:Ja
Datum der Eintragung als referierte Publikation:11.07.2002
Einverstanden
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.