TY - JOUR A1 - Marko, A. A1 - Bähring, S. A1 - Raute, J. A1 - Biegler, M. A1 - Rethmeier, Michael T1 - Transferability of ANN-generated parameter sets from welding tracks to 3D-geometries in Directed Energy Deposition N2 - Directed energy deposition (DED) has been in industrial use as a coating process for many years. Modern applications include the repair of existing components and additive manufacturing. The main advantages of DED are high deposition rates and low energy input. However, the process is influenced by a variety of parameters affecting the component quality. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) offer the possibility of mapping complex processes such as DED. They can serve as a tool for predicting optimal process parameters and quality characteristics. Previous research only refers to weld beads: a transferability to additively manufactured three-dimensional components has not been investigated. In the context of this work, an ANN is generated based on 86 weld beads. Quality categories (poor, medium, and good) are chosen as target variables to combine several quality features. The applicability of this categorization compared to conventional characteristics is discussed in detail. The ANN predicts the quality category of weld beads with an average accuracy of 81.5%. Two randomly generated parameter sets predicted as “good” by the network are then used to build tracks, coatings,walls, and cubes. It is shown that ANN trained with weld beads are suitable for complex parameter predictions in a limited way. KW - Welding parameter KW - Quality assurance KW - DED KW - Artificial neural network KW - Additive manufacturing PY - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0054 SN - 0025-5300 VL - 64 IS - 11 SP - 1586 EP - 1596 PB - De Gruyter AN - OPUS4-56278 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jokisch, T. A1 - Gook, S. A1 - Marko, A. A1 - Üstündag, Ömer A1 - Gumenyuk, Andrey A1 - Rethmeier, Michael T1 - Laser beam welding of additive manufactured components: Applicability of existing valuation regulations N2 - With additive manufacturing in the powder bed, the component size is limited by the installation space. Joint welding of additively manufactured parts offers a possibility to remove this size limitation. However, due to the specific stress and microstructure state in the additively built material, it is unclear to what extent existing evaluation rules of joint welding are also suitable for welds on additive components. This is investigated using laser beam welding of additively manufactured pipe joints. The welds are evaluated by means of visual inspection, metallographic examinations as well as computed tomography. The types of defects found are comparable to conventional components. This is an indicator that existing evaluation regulations also map the possible defects occurring for weld seams on additive components. KW - Weld imperfections KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Weldability KW - Laser welding PY - 2022 VL - 2 SP - 109 EP - 113 PB - DVS Media GmbH AN - OPUS4-56374 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Graf, B. A1 - Marko, A. A1 - Petrat, T. A1 - Gumenyuk, Andrey A1 - Rethmeier, Michael T1 - 3D laser metal deposition: process steps for additive manufacturing N2 - Laser metal deposition (LMD) is an established technology for two-dimensional surface coatings. It offers high deposition rates, high material flexibility, and the possibility to deposit material on existing components. Due to these features, LMD has been increasingly applied for additive manufacturing of 3D structures in recent years. Compared to previous coating applications, additive manufacturing of 3D structures leads to new challenges regarding LMD process knowledge. In this paper, the process steps for LMD as additive manufacturing technology are described. The experiments are conducted using titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4Vand Inconel 718. Only the LMD nozzle is used to create a shielding gas atmosphere. This ensures the high geometric flexibility needed for additive manufacturing, although issues with the restricted size and quality of the shielding gas atmosphere arise. In the first step, the influence of process parameters on the geometric dimensions of single weld beads is analyzed based on design of experiments. In the second step, a 3D build-up strategy for cylindrical specimen with high dimensional accuracy is described. Process parameters, travel paths, and cooling periods between layers are adjusted. Tensile tests show that mechanical properties in the as-deposited condition are close to wrought material. As practical example, the fir-tree root profile of a turbine blade is manufactured. The feasibility of LMD as additive technology is evaluated based on this component. KW - Laser metal deposition KW - Build-up strategy KW - Deposition rate KW - Additive manufacturing PY - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-018-0590-x SN - 0043-2288 SN - 1878-6669 VL - 62 IS - 4 SP - 877 EP - 883 PB - Springer Berlin Heidelberg CY - Heidelberg AN - OPUS4-44868 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Marko, A. A1 - Raute, J. A1 - Linaschke, D. A1 - Graf, B. A1 - Rethmeier, Michael T1 - Porosity of LMD manufactured parts analyzed by Archmimedes method and CT N2 - Pores in additive manufactured metal parts occur due to different reasons and affect the part Quality negatively. Few investigations on the origins of porosity are available, especially for Ni-based super alloys. This paper presents a new study to examine the influence of common processing Parameters on the Formation of pores in parts built by laser metal Deposition using Inconel 718 powder. Further, a comparison between the computed tomography (CT) and the Archimedes method was made. The Investigation Shows that CT is able to identify different kinds of pores and to give further Information about their distribution. The identification of some pores as well as their shape can be dependent on the Parameter Setting of the Analysis tool. Due to limited measurement Resolution, CT is not able to identify correctly pores with Diameters smaller than 0.1 mm, which leads to a false decrease on Overall porosity. The applied Archimedes method is unable to differentiate between gas porosity and other Kinds of holes like internal cracks or lack of Fusion, but it delivered a proper value for Overall porosity. The method was able to provide suitable data for the statistical Evaluation with design of Experiments, which revealed significant Parameters ont he Formation of pores in LMD. KW - Laser metal deposition KW - Additive manufacturing KW - Density measurement KW - Porosity KW - Design of experiments PY - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111232 SN - 0025-5300 VL - 60 IS - 11 SP - 1055 EP - 1060 PB - Hanser CY - Berlin AN - OPUS4-47094 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -