TY - RPRT A1 - Beck, Uwe A1 - Hielscher, Stefan A1 - Lerche, D. T1 - Abschlussbericht zum BMWi - MNPQ – Verbundprojekt QUO VADIS PLUS (Mehr-Proben-Festigkeitsprüfung zur Qualitätssicherung in der Materialtechnik und Validierung der Zentrifugentechnologie bei Druck- bzw. Zugbeanspruchung) N2 - Im Fokus des Vorhabens steht das mit dem Innovationspreis Berlin-Brandenburg 2012 ausgezeichnete Mehr-Proben-Prüfverfahren zur Festigkeitsprüfung unter Verwendung einer analytischen Zentrifuge mit dem Ziel des Einsatzes in der Qualitätssicherung. Nachdem im MNPQ-Projekt QUO VADIS die grundsätzliche Anwendbarkeit der Zentrifugentechnologie auf Beanspruchungen auf Zug (Kleb-, Haft- und Verbundfestigkeit) nachgewiesen worden war, wurden im Vorhaben QUO VADIS PLUS folgende erweiterte Prüfszenarien und technische Weiterentwicklungen etabliert: 1. Beanspruchung auf Druck (Härte von Materialien, Kompressibilität von Schäumen, Kompaktierbarkeit von Pulvern), 2. Erweiterung der Beanspruchung auf Zug (Kombination von Normal- und Lateralkräften), 3. Erweiterung auf die Bewertung plasto-elastischenn Materialverhaltens, 4. Vermeidung von Schockwellen im Hochlastbereich KW - Analytische Zentrifuge KW - Mehr-Proben-Prüfverfahren KW - Härte KW - Kompressibilität KW - Kompaktierbarkeit KW - Haftfestigkeit KW - Klebfestigkeit KW - Verbundfestigkeit PY - 2019 N1 - Das Dokument unterliegt der Vertraulichkeit und kann nicht zugänglich gemacht werden Projektlaufzeit: 01.05.2015 bis 28.02.2019 The document is subject to confidentiality restrictions and cannot be made accessible Project runtime: 01.05.2015 to 28.02.2019 SP - 1 EP - 20 AN - OPUS4-50406 LA - deu AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Rades, Steffi A1 - Natte, Kishore A1 - Unger, Wolfgang T1 - NanoValid D.5.47 Annex 1, Inter-laboratory comparison on measurand particle size/particle size distribution - Report of the results N2 - An inter-laboratory comparison on the particle size, expressed as mean diameter d, of nanoscaled SiO2 (#14 BAM Silica (see NanoValid DoW, D.5.41/5.42)) has been performed. The majority of participants used Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). A few used Electron Microscopy as method. Following methods had been applied by only one partner, respectively: Small Angle X-ray Scattering, Analytical Ultracentrifugation, Atomic Force Microscopy and Atomizer with electric mobility spectrometer. KW - Nanoparticle size measurement KW - Silica nanoparticles KW - Inter-laboratory comparison KW - EU FP7 project NanoValid PY - 2019 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-488117 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3380570 SP - 1 EP - 23 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-48811 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Rades, Steffi A1 - Natte, Kishore A1 - Unger, Wolfgang T1 - NanoValid D.5.47 Annex 2 Inter-laboratory comparison on measurand surface charge (Zeta Potential) of silica particles: Report of the results N2 - An inter-laboratory comparison on the surface charge, expressed as zeta potential ζ, of nanoscaled SiO2 has been performed using #14 BAM Silica (see D.5.41/5.42) nanoparticles. The comparability of results delivered by participants has been tested. The Task 5.4 of NanoValid is designed to test, compare and validate current methods to measure and characterize physicochemical properties of selected engineered nanoparticles. The measurand is Surface charge expressed as zeta-Potential. The measurements are to be accompanied by estimates of the uncertainties at a confidence level of 95%, deduced from the standard uncertainties. Therefore an uncertainty budget comprising statistical (Type A) and systematic (Type B) errors has to be established and delivered for the measurand. The protocol comprises two Annexes addressing the establishment of uncertainty budgets following GUM. The final goal of the comparison is to identify those methods of measurement which have potential as reference methods in pc characterization of nanoparticles for the determination of a given measurand. KW - Inter-laborator comparison KW - Surface charge KW - Zeta potential KW - Uncertainty budget KW - Silica nanoparticles KW - NanoValid PY - 2019 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-488483 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3379815 SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-48848 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Rades, Steffi A1 - Unger, Wolfgang T1 - NanoValid D.5.47 Annex 3 Inter-laboratory comparison on measurand specific surface area (BET) of nanoparticular Titania (#15 BAM Titania): Report of the results N2 - This Report describes an inter-laboratory comparison aiming on the establishment of the used method (BET) as a reference method. Another purpose was the certification of the porous reference material #15 BAM Titania as CRM BAM-P110 (cf. D 5.41/42). The certified values determined by nitrogen ad-sorption at 77.3 K according to the international standards ISO 15901-2 and ISO 9277 are summarized in the Table below. KW - Inter-laboratory comparison KW - Specific Surface Area (BET) KW - Nanoparticular TiO2 (Anatase) KW - EU FP7 project NanoValid PY - 2019 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b43-488491 DO - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3379612 SP - 1 EP - 22 PB - Zenodo CY - Geneva AN - OPUS4-48849 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Potthoff, A. A1 - Unger, Wolfgang T1 - Report on SOP for dispersing nanomaterials in water and report on round robin test. N2 - This report describes a standard operation procedure for dispersion of nanomaterials in liquids prior to toxicological or ecotoxicological testing. Main factors, who determine the state of agglomeration and aggregation of ENMs after dispersion are specific energy input, particle concentration and fluid composition. The method was validated in two round robin tests, where two typical nanomaterials (a nanopowder and a nanodispersion) were investigated. One main result arising out of the data comparison was that only those participants, who were able to follow the instructions in the SOPs completely, received similar results regarding particle size and zeta potential. The SOP is easy to adapt for other types of nanomaterials. The results provide the standardization process and were presented at DIN working group. KW - Dispersion of nano materials KW - AEROSIL® OX50 KW - LEVASIL 50/50 PY - 2019 UR - http://publica.fraunhofer.de/documents/N-541033.html DO - https://doi.org/10.24406/ikts-n-541033 SP - 1 EP - 24 AN - OPUS4-48022 LA - eng AD - Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Berlin, Germany ER -